Quantum Monte Carlo problem

Within the past decade much progress has also been made in experimental realizations of quantum computing hardware. Many architectures have been proposed based on a variety of physical hardware. On a small scale, quantum information has been stored and manipulated in superconducting quantum bits (qubits) [4,5], trapped ions [6,7], electron spins [8-11], nuclear spins in the liquid or solid state [12], and other systems. On the theoretical side, new quantum algorithms have recently been found, exhibiting significant pol momial speedups on quantum computers for solution of sparse linear equations or differential equations [13,14], quantum Monte Carlo problems [15], and classical simulated annealing problems [16]. 

Monte Carlo methods employ random numbers to solve problems. The range of problems that may be treated by Monte Carlo is large. These include simulation of physical (and other) processes, integration of multi-dimensional integrals, and applications in statistical mechanics see, for example [1, 2], The treatment of problems arising in the field of quantum mechanics using Monte Carlo is generally referred to as quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) see, for example [3-5]. 

Quantum Monte Carlo techniques have considerable potential for application to problems involving open d or f shells where the treatment of electron correlation has proven particularly difficult. However if is to be a viable alternative one must be able to limit the simulations to small numbers of electrons and in addition relativeity must be included. Relativistic effective potentials offer one avenue (at the present time the only avenue) for achieving these conditions. However, as we have indicated, REPs do introduce carpi icat ions. 

The extension of the applicability of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations to systems with heavy elements depends critically on the availability and accuracy of large-core PPs, possibly augmented by CPPs. Besides the usual problems of QMC,... 

Joslin and Goldman [105] in 1992 studied this problem by using the Diffusive Quantum Monte Carlo Methods. By resorting to the hard spherical box model, they performed calculations, not only on the ground state of helium atom, but also for H- and Li+. In this method the Schrodinger equation is... 

Electronic structure calculations may be carried out at many levels, differing in cost, accuracy, and reliability. At the simplest level, molecular mechanics (this volume, Chapter 1) may be used to model a wide range of systems at low cost, relying on large sets of adjustable parameters. Next, at the semiempirical level (this volume, Chapter 2), the techniques of quantum mechanics are used, but the computational cost is reduced by extensive use of empirical parameters. Finally, at the most complex level, a rigorous quantum mechanical treatment of electronic structure is provided by nonempirical, wave function-based quantum chemical methods [1] and by density functional theory (DFT) (this volume, Chapter 4). Although not treated here, other less standard techniques such as quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) have also been developed for the electronic structure problem (for these, we refer to the specialist literature, Refs. 5-7). 

We hope to have convinced the reader that the VMC approach to obtaining quantum expectation values of interest in both chemical and physical problems is a very powerful one. We believe that it, in combination with fully quantum Monte Carlo procedures, will be the preferred choice in the near future, for many of the calculations performed these days by more traditional nonstochastic means. VMC is the first, and a necessary step, toward a complete quantum simulation of a system. It has the very desirable feature (often a rare one) that it can be learned, implemented, and tested in a short period of time. (It is now part of the folklore in the quantum Monte Carlo community, that the original code, written by J. B. Anderson and used for his first QMC paper, was only 77 lines of FORTRAN code.) We hope our readers will be inspired to write their own (toy or otherwise) VMC code possibly thereby contributing to and enlarging the growing Monte Carlo community. 

Increases in computer power and improvements in algorithms have greatly extended the range of applicability of classical molecular simulation methods. In addition, the recent development of Internal Coordinate Quantum Monte Carlo (ICQMC) has allowed the direct comparison of classical simulations and quantum mechanical results for some systems. In particular, it has provided new insights into the zero point energy problem in many body systems. Classical studies of non-linear dynamics and chaos will be compared to ICQMC results for several systems of interest to nanotechnology applications. The ramifications of these studies for nanotechnology applications will be discussed. 

The recent development of internal coordinate quantum Monte Carlo has made it possible to directly compare classical and quantum calculations for many body systems. Classical molecular dynamics simulations of many body systems may sometimes overestimate vibrational motion due to the leakage of zero point energy. The problem appears to become less severe for more highly connected bond networks and more highly constrained systems. This suggests that current designs of some nanomachine components may be more workable than MD simulations suggest. Further study of classical-quantum correspondence in many body systems is necessary to resolve these concerns. 

---