Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantum mechanical charge field approach

While the QM/MM approach has been successfully used for a large number of very different systems (18-20) it is still subject to significant improvements. One of these improvements is the recently developed quantum mechanical charge field (QMCF MD) methodology, which will be presented in more detail here, demonstrating its capabilities with a number of applications to quite different liquid systems, in particular to electrolyte solutions. [Pg.147]

Hofer TS, Pribil AB, Randolf BR, Rode BM (2010a) Ab initio quantum mechanical charge field molecular dynamics A nonparametrized first-principle approach to liquids and solutions, Adv Quant Chem 59 213... [Pg.131]

In Equation 4.56, the real quantities p, v, and j are the charge density, velocity field, and current density, respectively. The above equations provide the basis for the fluid dynamical approach to quantum mechanics. In this approach, the time evolution of a quantum system in any state can be completely interpreted in terms of a continuous, flowing fluid of charge density p(r,t) and the current density j(r,t), subjected to forces arising from not only the classical potential V(r, t) but also from an additional potential VqU(r, t), called the quantum or Bohm potential the latter arises from the kinetic energy and depends on the density as well as its gradients. The current... [Pg.52]

The usual way to treat the interaction between electromagnetic fields or nuclear electromagnetic moments and molecules is a semi-classical way, where the fields or nuclear moments are treated classically and the electrons are treated by quantum mechanics. The fields or nuclear moments are thus not part of the system, which is treated quantum mechanically, but they are merely considered to be perturbations that do not respond to the presence of the molecule. They therefore enter the molecular Hamiltonian in terms of external potentials similar to the Coulomb potential due to the charges of the nuclei. This is therefore called the minimal coupling approach. [Pg.13]

In this paper a method [11], which allows for an a priori BSSE removal at the SCF level, is for the first time applied to interaction densities studies. This computational protocol which has been called SCF-MI (Self-Consistent Field for Molecular Interactions) to highlight its relationship to the standard Roothaan equations and its special usefulness in the evaluation of molecular interactions, has recently been successfully used [11-13] for evaluating Eint in a number of intermolecular complexes. Comparison of standard SCF interaction densities with those obtained from the SCF-MI approach should shed light on the effects of BSSE removal. Such effects may then be compared with those deriving from the introduction of Coulomb correlation corrections. To this aim, we adopt a variational perturbative valence bond (VB) approach that uses orbitals derived from the SCF-MI step and thus maintains a BSSE-free picture. Finally, no bias should be introduced in our study by the particular approach chosen to analyze the observed charge density rearrangements. Therefore, not a model but a theory which is firmly rooted in Quantum Mechanics, applied directly to the electron density p and giving quantitative answers, is to be adopted. Bader s Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAM) [14, 15] meets nicely all these requirements. Such a theory has also been recently applied to molecular crystals as a valid tool to rationalize and quantitatively detect crystal field effects on the molecular densities [16-18]. [Pg.105]

In the quantum mechanical continuum model, the solute is embedded in a cavity while the solvent, treated as a continuous medium having the same dielectric constant as the bulk liquid, is incorporated in the solute Hamiltonian as a perturbation. In this reaction field approach, which has its origin in Onsager s work, the bulk medium is polarized by the solute molecules and subsequently back-polarizes the solute, etc. The continuum approach has been criticized for its neglect of the molecular structure of the solvent. Also, the higher-order moments of the charge distribution, which in general are not included in the calculations, may have important effects on the results. Another important limitation of the early implementations of this method was the lack of a realistic representation of the cavity form and size in relation to the shape of the solute. [Pg.334]

Nuclear size corrections of order (Za) may be obtained in a quite straightforward way in the framework of the quantum mechanical third order perturbation theory. In this approach one considers the difference between the electric field generated by the nonlocal charge density described by the nuclear form factor and the field of the pointlike charge as a perturbation operator [16, 17]. [Pg.122]

Ligand field theory may be taken to be the subject which attempts to rationalize and account for the physical properties of transition metal complexes in fairly simple-minded ways. It ranges from the simplest approach, crystal field theory, where ligands are represented by point charges, through to elementary forms of molecular orbital theory, where at least some attempt at a quantum mechanical treatment is involved. The aims of ligand field theory can be treated as essentially empirical in nature ab initio and even approximate proper quantum mechanical treatments are not considered to be part of the subject, although the simpler empirical methods may be. [Pg.214]

The applications of continuum models to the study of solvent induced changes of the shielding constant are numerous. Solvent reaction field calculations differ mainly in the level of theory of the quantum mechanical treatment, the method used for the gauge invariance problem in the calculations of the shielding constants and the approaches used for the calculations of the charge interaction with the medium. [Pg.134]

The key differences between the PCM and the Onsager s model are that the PCM makes use of molecular-shaped cavities (instead of spherical cavities) and that in the PCM the solvent-solute interaction is not simply reduced to the dipole term. In addition, the PCM is a quantum mechanical approach, i.e. the solute is described by means of its electronic wavefunction. Similarly to classical approaches, the basis of the PCM approach to the local field relies on the assumption that the effective field experienced by the molecule in the cavity can be seen as the sum of a reaction field term and a cavity field term. The reaction field is connected to the response (polarization) of the dielectric to the solute charge distribution, whereas the cavity field depends on the polarization of the dielectric induced by the applied field once the cavity has been created. In the PCM, cavity field effects are accounted for by introducing the concept of effective molecular response properties, which directly describe the response of the molecular solutes to the Maxwell field in the liquid, both static E and dynamic E, [8,47,48] (see also the contribution by Cammi and Mennucci). [Pg.172]


See other pages where Quantum mechanical charge field approach is mentioned: [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.117]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.255 ]




SEARCH



Mechanical approach

Quantum Approach

Quantum mechanical approaches

Quantum mechanics approaches

© 2024 chempedia.info