Hamiltonian quantum electrodynamics

Crowell discovered a variety of effects numerically, including modified Rabi flopping, which has an inverse frequency dependence similar to that observed in the solid state in reciprocal noise [73]. The latter is also explained by Crowell [17] using a non-Abelian model. A variety of other effects of RFR on the quantum electrodynamical level was also reported numerically [17]. The overall result is that the occurrence, classically, of the B V> field means that there is a quantum electrodynamical Hamiltonian generated by the classical term proportional to 3 2. This induces transitional behavior because it contributes to the dynamics of probability amplitudes [17]. The Hamiltonian is a quartic potential where the value of determines the value of the potential. The latter has two minima one where B = 0 and the other for a finite value of the B i) field, corresponding to states that are invariants of the Lagrangian but not of the vacuum. 

We begin by writing down the quantum electrodynamical Hamiltonian for the system comprising the radiation and the tck o molecules A and B. We adopt the Hamiltonian given by the Power-Zienau-Woolley transformation, which may be expressed as follows (Power and Zic nau 1959 Woolley 1971)... 

Asymptotic Condition.—In Section 11.1, we exhibited the equivalence of the formulation of quantum electrodynamics in the Coulomb and Lorentz gauges in so far as observable quantities were concerned (t.e., scattering amplitudes). We also noted that both of these formulations, when based on a hamiltonian not containing mass renormalization counter terms, suffered from the difficulty that the... 

With the exception of recent extensions to electroweak theory [1] chemistry deals exclusively with electromagnetic interactions. The starting point for a quantum theory to describe these interactions is the Lagrangian formalism since it allows the correct identification of conjugated momenta appearing in the Hamiltonian [2]. Full-fledged quantum electrodynamics (QED) is based on a Lagrangian of the form... 

A systematic development of relativistic molecular Hamiltonians and various non-relativistic approximations are presented. Our starting point is the Dirac one-fermion Hamiltonian in the presence of an external electromagnetic field. The problems associated with generalizing Dirac s one-fermion theory smoothly to more than one fermion are discussed. The description of many-fermion systems within the framework of quantum electrodynamics (QED) will lead to Hamiltonians which do not suffer from the problems associated with the direct extension of Dirac s one-fermion theory to many-fermion system. An exhaustive discussion of the recent QED developments in the relevant area is not presented, except for cursory remarks for completeness. The non-relativistic form (NRF) of the many-electron relativistic Hamiltonian is developed as the working Hamiltonian. It is used to extract operators for the observables, which represent the response of a molecule to an external electromagnetic radiation field. In this study, our focus is mainly on the operators which eventually were used to calculate the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts and indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants. 

The relativistic many-electron Hamiltonian cannot be written in closed form it may be derived perturbatively from quantum electrodynamics [1]. The simplest form is the Dirac-Coulomb (DC) Hamiltonian, where the nonrelativistic one-electron terms in the Schrodinger equation are replaced by the one-electron Dirac operator hj). 

When innermost core shells must be treated explicitly, the four-component versions of the GREGP operator can be used, in principle, together with the all-electron relativistic Hamiltonians. The GRECP can describe here some quantum electrodynamics effects (self-energy, vacuum polarization etc.) thus avoiding their direct treatment. One more remark is that the... 

The 0(3) quantum electrodynamic equivalent of the RFR effect has been numerically analyzed by Crowell [17] using the Hamiltonian (327). Numerically, it is possible to consider only a finite number of photon modes, and the difference in energy between these modes is set equal to the difference between the two spin states of the fermion. More complex situations were also analyzed... 

It now remains to expand the operators in (3.235) using the definitions given in (3.230) but before we do so we must draw attention to a difficulty with (3.235). The final term, containing the operator (00)2 is not obtained if a more sophisticated treatment starting from the Bethe Salpeter equation is used. The reader will recall our earlier comment that the interaction term in the Breit Hamiltonian is acceptable provided it is treated by first-order perturbation theory. Rather than launch into quantum electrodynamics at this stage, we shall proceed to develop (3.235) but will omit the (00)2 term without further comment. 

In order to complete our derivation of the molecular Hamiltonian we must consider the nuclear Hamiltonian in more detail. A thorough relativistic treatment analogous to that for the electron is not possible within the limitations of quantum mechanics, since nuclei are not Dirac particles and they can have large anomalous magnetic moments. However, the use of quantum electrodynamics [18] shows that we can derive the correct Hamiltonian to order 1 /c2 by taking the non-relativistic Hamiltonian ... 

In section 3.4 the transformed Hamiltonian is expressed as a formal power series in 1 jc so that the limitations imposed by neglect of specifically quantum electrodynamic... 

The potential energy surface used in solution, G (R), is related to an effective Hamiltonian containing a solute-solvent interaction term, Vint- In the implementation of the EH-CSD model, that will be examined in Section 6, use is made of the equilibrium solute-solvent potential. There are good reasons to do so however, when the attention is shifted to a dynamical problem, we have to be careful in the definition of Vint - This operator may be formally related to a response function TZ which depends on time. For simplicity s sake, we may replace here TZ with the polarization vector P, which actually is the most important component of TZ (another important contribution is related to Gdis) For the calculation of Gei (see eq.7), we resort to a static value, while for dynamic calculations we have to use a P(t) function quantum electrodynamics offers the theoretical framework for the calculation of P as well as of TZ. The strict quantum electrodynamical approach is not practical, hence one usually resorts to simple naive models. 

Since the exact relativistic many-electron Hamiltonian is not known, the electron-electron interaction operators g(i, j) are taken to be of Coulomb type, i.e. 1/r,- . As a first relativistic correction to these nonrelativistic electron-electron interaction operators, the Breit correction, Equations (2.2) or (2.3), is used. For historical reasons, the first term in Equation (2.2) is called the Gaunt or magnetic part of the full Breit interaction. Since it is not more complicated than l/ri2, it is from an algorithmic point of view equivalent to the Coulomb interaction, therefore it has frequently been included in the calculations. The second term, the so-called retardation term, appears to be rather complicated and it has been considered less frequently. In the case of few-electron systems further quantum electrodynamical corrections, like self-energy and vacuum polarization, have also been considered and are reviewed in another part of this book (see Chapter 1). 

The Zeeman Hamiltonian is multiplied by a correction factor ge/2 which arises from a treatment of the interaction of between an electron and the electromagnetic field according to quantum electrodynamics [114],... 

The correction B(i,j) to the Coulomb potential is treated as a perturbation of the zero-order Hamiltonian, and may include relaxation effects, correlations, quantum electrodynamic corrections and the relativistic retardation of the two-electron potential. 

Since the spectrum of the DCB Hamiltonian is not bounded from below it is not possible to optimize the wave function by minimization of the energy. The unphysical unboundedness is due to the fact that not all possible normalizible antisymmetric wave functions of N coordinates are states of an N-electron system. The set of possible solutions also contains wavefunctions in which one or more negative energy levels are occupied and it is the mixing with such states that gives rise to unphysical arbitrarily low energies. One needs the second quantization formalism of quantum electrodynamics (QED) for a proper treatment of these states. As this is discussed in more depth elsewhere in this... 

For further details the reader is referred to, e.g., a review article by Kutzel-nigg [67]. The Gaunt- and Breit-interaction is often not treated variationally but rather by first-order perturbation theory after a variational treatment of the Dirac-Coulomb-Hamiltonian. The contribution of higher-order corrections such as the vaccuum polarization or self-energy of the electron can be derived from quantum electrodynamics (QED), but are usually neglected due to their negligible impact on chemical properties. 

Since the Dirac equation is valid only for the one-electron system, the one-electron Dirac Hamiltonian has to be extended to the many-electron Hamiltonian in order to treat the chemically interesting many-electron systems. The straightforward way to construct the relativistic many-electron Hamiltonian is to augment the one-electron Dirac operator, Eq. (70) with the Coulomb or Breit (or its approximate Gaunt) operator as a two-electron term. This procedure yields the Dirac-Coulomb (DC) or Dirac-Coulomb-Breit (DCB) Hamiltonian derived from quantum electrodynamics (QED)... 

An overview of the salient features of the relativistic many-body perturbation theory is given here concentrating on those features which differ from the familiar non-relativistic formulation and to its relation with quantum electrodynamics. Three aspects of the relativistic many-body perturbation theory are considered in more detail below the representation of the Dirac spectrum in the algebraic approximation is discussed the non-additivity of relativistic and electron correlation effects is considered and the use of the Dirac-Hartree-Fock-Coulomb-Breit reference Hamiltonian demonstrated effects which go beyond the no virtual pair approximation and the contribution made by the negative energy states are discussed. 

Although the proper point of departure for relativistic atomic structure calculations is quantum electrodynamics (QED), very few atomic structure calculations have been carried out entirely within the QED framework. Indeed, almost all relativistic calculations of the structure of many-electron atoms are based on some variant of the Hamiltonian introduced a half century ago by Brown and Ravenhall [1] to understand the helium fine structure. By decoupling the electron and radiation fields in QED to order a (the fine-structure constant) using a contact transformation. Brown and Ravenhall obtained a relativistic momentum-space Hamiltonian in which the electron-electron Coulomb interaction was surrounded by positive-energy projection operators. Owing to the fact that contributions from virtual electron-positron pairs are automatically projected out of... 

---