Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships , common

Neural networks have been proposed as an alternative way to generate quantitative structure-activity relationships [Andrea and Kalayeh 1991]. A commonly used type of neural net contains layers of units with connections between all pairs of units in adjacent layers (Figure 12.38). Each unit is in a state represented by a real value between 0 and 1. The state of a unit is determined by the states of the units in the previous layer to which it is connected and the strengths of the weights on these connections. A neural net must first be trained to perform the desired task. To do this, the network is presented with a... [Pg.719]

Several research techniques are commonly used in the field of QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship). Nevertheless, this research area is constantly on the search to develop better, faster, or different methods. In this section, we intend to point out some ongoing research efforts that are exploring unique pathways with the same goal of better understanding the metabolism process of CYPs. [Pg.497]

It is important to consider the molecular interactions in liquids that are responsible for their physicochemical properties (such as boiling point, melting point, heat of vaporization, surface tension, etc.), which enables one to both describe and relate the different properties of matter in a more clear manner (both qualitatively and quantitatively). These ideas form the basis for quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR Birdi, 2002). This approach toward analysis and application is becoming more common due to the enormous help available from computers. [Pg.10]

Hansch analysis Hansch analysis is a common quantitative structure-activity relationship approach in which a Hansch equation predicting biological activity is constructed. The equation arises from a multiple linear regression analysis of both observed biological activities and various molecular property parameters (Hammett, Hansch, and Taft parameters). [Pg.399]

Common unspecific mode of action of all organic compounds has been taken up in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs see Chapter 5) as the concept of baseline toxicity and in toxicokinetics as the body burden concept (see Chapter 2). Baseline toxicity refers to the idea that a minimum toxicity expectation may be formulated for any given organic compound based on considerations of a compound s partition properties between hydrophilic and lipophilic chemicals (e.g., between water and octanol). Commonly, this is expressed in terms of the octanol-water partition coefficient (K0,J of a chemical. The partition coefficient allows estimations of a local concentration or body burden for each individual chemical in the mixture. Assuming that this produces the same toxic effect (disturbances of cell membranes), it is then possible to anticipate joint narcotic action by adding together the respective local concentrations or body burdens for each individual mixture component. [Pg.103]

Molecules of similar biochemical activity often show common 3D shape features. Consequently, the characterization of the shapes of formal molecular bodies and the recognition, description, and, ultimately, the numerical evaluation of similarity among molecules are of major importance in modern pharmaceutical research, as well as in pesticide and herbicide chemistry. The analysis of molecular shape is an important component of research aimed at the elucidation of drug-receptor interactions and in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships in contemporary drug design. [Pg.175]

The ubiquitous involvement of these materials in chirality induction for the purposes of assaying small molecules, determining enantiomeric purities, quality control, and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) is reviewed later in this article. The detector that is common to all these applications is CD. [Pg.456]

Another limitation and restriction of these models are the data reliability of the Henry s law constants. It is very important that accurate Henry s law constants shall be available for modeling an air stripper as all design parameters and costs are strongly sensitive to the Henry s law constants (22). For many common VOCs, the constants are available in books as well as the literature. For uncommon contaminants, the constants may be looked up in an extensive database by Sander (36) or predicted by using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model for Henry s law constant (37). However, if the data are absent or data reliability is of question, pilot testing or laboratory measurement of the Henry s law constant is recommended (38). [Pg.75]

Cronin MTD, Dearden JC, Walker JD, and Worth AP (2003) Quantitative structure-activity relationships for human health effects Commonalities with other endpoints. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry IT. 1829-1843. [Pg.2683]

Mother nature is a good resource for new molecules over 10000 natural products are isolated each year [ 1 ]. Historically, natural products have provided a good number of leads for the development of new drugs [2], However, since natural products are commonly screened as an extraction mixture, deconvolution of an active component and structural characterization are difficult tasks. In addition, isolation of natural products has a long cycle time and is considered expensive [3], These limitations have prompted efforts to synthesize natural product analogues and natural-product-like compounds for biological screening and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies. [Pg.335]

Zhang et al. [36] combine DFT-based conformation analysis with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis. They looked at bioactive conformations for 25 cyclic imide derivatives as proto-porphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. PPO is the last common enzyme in the biosynthetic... [Pg.109]

POP) in the environment, that is, how the chemical in water will be taken up by animal and vegetable life and by soils and sediments. This coefficient is also used as an indicator of chemical hydrophobicity in most quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for designing new drugs (Franke, 1984). Experimental values of the octanol-water partition coefficient for the hydrophobic chemicals common in the chemical industry vary... [Pg.331]


See other pages where Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships , common is mentioned: [Pg.696]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.16]   


SEARCH



QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIPS

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Quantitative structur-activity relationships

Quantitative structure-activity

Structure common

© 2024 chempedia.info