Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative behavior

Process modeling is usually performed for two reasons. For fundamental and scientific studies a process model serves to explain and predict the quantitative behavior of physical or chemical phenomena in the process. The predictive capability of the model, however, is usually exploited by the engineer in order to improve the process. Once the model, the process and problem limitations, and the criterion for improvement are clearly and... [Pg.197]

The derivation of the terminal (or hrst-order Markov) copolymer composition equation (Eq. 6-12 or 6-15) rests on two important assumptions—one of a kinetic nature and the other of a thermodynamic nature. The Erst is that the reactivity of the propagating species is independent of the identity of the monomer unit, which precedes the terminal unit. The second is the irreversibility of the various propagation reactions. Deviations from the quantitative behavior predicted by the copolymer composition equation under certain reaction conditions have been ascribed to the failure of one or the other of these two assumptions or the presence of a comonomer complex which undergoes propagation. [Pg.512]

As we noted above, the evaluation of W for given values of dispersion properties such as surface potential, Hamaker constant, pH, electrolyte concentration, and so on, forms the goal of classical colloid stability analysis. Because of the complicated form of the expressions for electrostatic and van der Waals (and other relevant) energies of interactions, the above task is not a simple one and requires numerical evaluations of Equation (49). Under certain conditions, however, one can obtain a somewhat easier to use expression for W. This expression can be used to understand the qualitative (and, to some extent, quantitative) behavior of W with respect to the barrier against coagulation and the properties of the dispersion. We examine this in some detail below. [Pg.598]

The use.of the terms "acids" and "bases") 8)G.B.L.Smith, "Acid-Base System" in Kirk Othmer, 1( 1947), 128-137 9)R.P.Bell, "Acids and Bases. Their Quantitative Behavior,"Wiley,NY(1952) 10)R.P. Bell, Acid-Base Catalysis and Molecular Structure, 151-210 in "Advances in Catalysis" 4, Academic Press,NY(1952)... [Pg.88]

Very few reports have been published on the use of X-rays for modification of starch, although the formation of deoxy compounds on irradiation of solid potato starch with 5 X 106 rads under nitrogen has been described. The amount of deoxy compounds formed is related almost linearly to the irradiation dose, and formation of 2-deoxy-D-arabi no-hexose is the major process there are almost no side-pro-cesses. Similar qualitative, but not quantitative, behavior is shown by 1% aqueous solutions of D-glucose, D-xylose, L-arabinose, D-ribose, sucrose, and cellulose powder (Fig. 14). Starch is the most resistant to irradiation among carbohydrates tested.74... [Pg.263]

Figure 3a shows the quantitative behavior of 2-alkenals. The amount of each compound reached a maximum after 4 hr of heating, then decreased to a plateau. For all four compounds a shoulder was observed between approximately 12 hr and 40 hr. The same trends were observed for the alkanals (Figure 3b), the methyl ketones (Figure 3c), the alkanes (Figure 3d), and the alkadienals (Figure 3e). The behavior of the lactones was not clear (Figure 3f). The shoulder phenomenon, which was observed for most of the compounds tested, can not be explained at this time. Figure 3a shows the quantitative behavior of 2-alkenals. The amount of each compound reached a maximum after 4 hr of heating, then decreased to a plateau. For all four compounds a shoulder was observed between approximately 12 hr and 40 hr. The same trends were observed for the alkanals (Figure 3b), the methyl ketones (Figure 3c), the alkanes (Figure 3d), and the alkadienals (Figure 3e). The behavior of the lactones was not clear (Figure 3f). The shoulder phenomenon, which was observed for most of the compounds tested, can not be explained at this time.
The reaction of F2 with II2 might be expected to be a rather complicated chain because the F atoms are just about as reactive as the II atoms. In such a case we can no longer neglect chain-ending reactions such as II + II + M and H + F + M compared to F + F + M, and the algebraic rate expressions become much more complicated. This reaction is one of the most exothermic known (per unit weight of reactants) and has been used to give intense flames. However, very little is known of the quantitative behavior of the system except the fact that it is very wall-sensitive. ... [Pg.340]

Although emulsion polymerization has been carried out for at least 50 years and has enormous economic importance, the detailed quantitative behavior of these reactors is still not well understood. For example, there are many more mechanisms and phenomena reported experimentally than have been incorporated in the existing theories. Considerations such as non-micellar particle formation, non-uniform particle morphologies, polymer chain end stabilization of latex particles, particle coalescence, etc. have been discussed qualitatively, but not quantitatively included in existing reactor models. [Pg.359]

The origin of these interactions, called exchange, was first realized by Heisenberg and Dirac in 1926. The interpretation of the exchange effect as formally equivalent to the coupling between spins permits the use of a vector-coupling scheme to model the quantitative behavior of coupled spins with the... [Pg.2478]

A model is considered successful if it explains the observed behavior in question and predicts correctly the results of future experiments. Note that a model can never be proved to be absolutely true. In fact, any model is an approximation by its very nature and is bound to fail at some point. Models range from the simple to the extraordinarily complex. We use simple models to predict approximate behavior and more complicated models to account very precisely for observed quantitative behavior. In this text we will stress simple models that provide an approximate picture of what might be happening and that fit the most important experimental results. [Pg.154]

Having defined the H bond and presented the qualitative evidence for its occurrence, we may now consider quantitative behavior. Since a H bond is formed in an equilibrium reaction, the thermodynamic equations are applicable. Fortunately, many cases involve fairly simple equilibria in a temperature range which is readily available (usually between 0 and 200°C). [Pg.206]

In order to understand how the algorithm actually works and to construct an explicit expression for the error it is not convenient to work with the metadynamics equations (12) in their full generality. Instead, we notice that the finite temperature dynamics of the collective variables satisfies, under rather general conditions, a stochastic differential equation [54,55]. Furthermore, in real systems the quantitative behavior of metadynamics is perfectly reproduced by the Langevin equation in its strong friction limit [56]. This is due to the fact that all the relaxation times are usually much smaller than the typical diffusion time in the CV space. Hence, we model the CVs evolution with a Langevin t3rpe dynamics ... [Pg.329]

Extreme conditions are often used to reveal most clearly the distinctive qualitative features of a mechanism such as the order of reactions or their relative magnitudes. However, the quantitative behavior of the mechanism under such conditions may be quite different from the actual behavior under physiological conditions. [Pg.120]

Solid particles. The problem of convective diffusion to a chain of solid reacting particles was studied in [168, 350], The retardation mechanism (shielding) of mass exchange in a chain of solid particles and the quantitative behavior of such a system are the same as for chains of drops. [Pg.210]

By phenomenological wear we mean wear as it is actually observed and measured. The behavior encountered ranges from the crude qualitative observations of ordinary experience to the highly sensitive measurements of rigorously controlled laboratory experiments. Since our major interest in this discussion is in the fundamental and scientific aspects of wear, the treatment will be focused on quantitative behavior. [Pg.350]

The velocity now depends partly upon actual proton transfers, and partly on an equilibrium controlled by the hydrogen ion concentration. The reaction would appear to be catalyzed by acid species other than the hydrogen ion, but the quantitative behavior would be complex, and it is doubtful whether this case has been observed in practice. [Pg.176]

The qualitative behavior is identical for all parameter settings The phosphorylated STAT-5 in the cytoplasm shows a biphasic behavior, the total amount of STAT-5 in the cytoplasm decreases monotonically. However, the quantitative behavior depends on the parameters. Thus, if simulated model predictions are compared to experimental data, it is difficult to decide whether discrepancies between simulated and measured data result from inadequate parameters or from an insufficient model. To resolve this simulation dilemma [29], we will estimate the parameters from the experimental data. Mathematically, the equations of the system under investigation can be summarized as ... [Pg.1051]

The measurement of peak currents in CV is imprecise because the correction for charging current is typically uncertain. For the reversal peak, the imprecision is increased further because one cannot readily define the folded faradaic response for the forward process (e.g., curve 1, 2, or 3 in Figure 6.5.2) to use as a reference for the measurement. Consequently, CV is not an ideal method for quantitative evaluation of system properties that must be derived from peak heights, such as the concentration of an electroactive species or the rate constant of a coupled homogeneous reaction. The method s power lies in its diagnostic strength, which is derived from the ease of interpreting qualitative and semi-quantitative behavior. Once a system is understood mechanistically, other methods are often better suited for the precise evaluation of parameters. [Pg.240]


See other pages where Quantitative behavior is mentioned: [Pg.41]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.2473]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.2249]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.292]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 , Pg.116 ]




SEARCH



Current-potential curves, quantitative behavior

Mixtures behavior, quantitative measurement

Phase behavior quantitative representation

Quantitative Phase Behavior

Quantitative Representation of Flow Behavior

Quantitative structure behavior relationship

© 2024 chempedia.info