Pseudomonas vulgaris

Specific bacteriostatic activity against Escherichia coli (681, 896, 899), Staphylococcus aureus (681, 896), Cocci (900), Shigella dysenteriae (681), Salmonella ryphi (681), Proteus vulgaris (681), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (681), Streptococcus (889, 901, 902) and Pneumococcus (901-904). 

Although reduction of chromate Cr to Cr has been observed in a number of bacteria, these are not necessarily associated with chromate resistance. For example, reduction of chromate has been observed with cytochrome Cj in Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Lovley and Phillips 1994), soluble chromate reductase has been purified from Pseudomonas putida (Park et al. 2000), and a membrane-bound reductase has been purified from Enterobacter cloacae (Wang et al. 1990). The flavoprotein reductases from Pseudomonas putida (ChrR) and Escherichia coli (YieF) have been purified and can reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (Ackerley et al. 2004). Whereas ChrR generated a semi-quinone and reactive oxygen species, YieR yielded no semiquinone, and is apparently an obligate four-electron reductant. It could therefore present a suitable enzyme for bioremediation. 

Cellulolytic bacteria can be found which produce only cell-bound cellulase such as Cytophaga (12), only cell-free cellulase, such as CelMbrio vulgaris (21), Bacillus sp. (22), Clostridium sp. (23), Acetivibrio cellulofyticus (24), and Thermoactinomyces (25,26), and both cell-bound and cell-free cellulase such as Pseudomonas (27), Bacteroides succinogenes (28), and CelMbrio futvus (29). However, the location of cellulase in bacteria is also dependent upon the environments in which the bacteria are grown and the age of the culture (29,27). 

Enterobacter sp., Proteus vulgaris, Providencia rettgeri, Morganella morganii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 

Citrobacter freundii Enterobacter cloacae Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus vulgaris Pseudomonas aeruginosa Salmonella typhimurium Serratia marcescens Shigella spp. Staphylococcus spp. Streptococcus spp. Candida albicans Saccharomyces cerevisiae Acanthamoeba castellani Paramecium caudatum Tetrahymena pyrifomds... 

Slime formers Aerobic, capsulated, gram-negative bacilli, Pseudomonas sp. (such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa), Aerobacter sp. (also known as Enterobacter or Klebsiella), Bacillus sp. (such as Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus), Flavobacterium sp., Proteus vulgaris, Serratia sp., and Alcaligenes sp. 

Chakrabarty et al. (1989) selected several antihistamines for detection of antibacterial action [15]. According to them, promethazine was the most powerful and significant antimicrobial. The authors observed that in staphylococci, shigellae, and vibrios the MIC of promethazine varied between 100 and 200 xg/ml. Although one strain of Escherichia coli was sensitive at 50 xg/ml, the others were resistant. With respect to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris, and Providencia spp., the MIC of promethazine was always >200 pg/ml (Table 7). 

Class I enzymes, which have been further subdivided la to Id, are predominantly active against cephalosporins.They are characteristically produced by strains of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter species, Morganella, Proteus vulgaris. Pseudomonas, Citrobacter, Klebsiella and Serratia species. The genetic information of these enzymes is chromosomally mediated and enzyme production may be constitutive or inducible. 

Abbreviations for tables C.d, Citrobacter diversus C.f, Citrobacter freundii E.ae., Enterobacter aerogenes E.cl, Enlerobacter cloacae E.co., Escherichia coli K.a., Klebsiella aerogenes K.o., Klebsiella oxytoca K.p., Klebsiella pneumoniae M.m., Morganella morganii P.m., Proteus mirabilis Pv., Proteus vulgaris Ps.a., Pseudomonas aeruginosa Se.m., Serratia marcescens S.a., Staphylococcus aureus. 

The antibacterial activity of jatrorrhizine against the Gram-negative bacilli Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus vulgaris was determined, but unfortunately not described in this abstract [292],... 

---