Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pseudo-first-order approximation

It is obvious from the discussion above that any kinetic-based analytical procedure must take into account the degree of approximation made in the various rate equations with respect to the period of measurement, the relative initial concentrations of reactants, and, in some cases, the reversibility of the reactions. Care must be taken, for example, in using a pseudo-first-order method when the initial concentration of the unknown varies over several orders of magnitude the error introduced in assuming the validity of the pseudo-first-order approximation of Equation 18.8 is a function of [A]q. Although the reaction mechanisms and rate equations for enzymatic and other catalyzed reactions in general are somewhat more complex, similar assumptions and simplifications (and, therefore, restrictions in validity) apply to the rate-measurement techniques employed in the analytical use of these systems. [Pg.532]

Here [g m" -h ] is the maximum mass flux through biofilm surface. The physical model used by these authors was the same as that proposed by Atkinson, extended to double S limitation (glucose and O2). Their authors case A corresponds to no S or O2 limitation, case B involves an inactive aerobic film (S limitation), and case C involves O2 limitation (partly anaerobic film). With a modified Thiele modulus and a pseudo-first-order approximation for the enzyme-catalyzed rate under the given surface conditions, Fig. 4.40 shows the result of the calculation of versus (/>j as a function of Sj /K under various conditions. For biofilm reactor operation, is more convenient in the form... [Pg.182]

Measuring a second order reaction rate with reactants A and B can be problematic the concentrations of the two reactants must be followed simultaneously, which is difficult or one of them can be measured and the other calculated as a difference, which is less precise. A common solution for that problem is the pseudo first order approximation. If the concentration of one of the reactants remains constant (because it is a catalyst or it is in great excess with respect to the other reactants) its concentration can be grouped with the rate constant, thereby obtaining a pseudo constant. [Pg.35]

While ethyl chloride is one of the least toxic of all chlorinated hydrocarbons, CE is a toxic pollutant. The off-gas from the reactor is scrubbed with water in two absoiption columns. The first column is intended to recover the majority of unreacted ethanol, hydrogen chloride, and CE. The second scrubber purifies the product fiom traces of unreacted materials and acts as a back-up column in case the first scrubber is out of operation. Each scrubber contains two sieve plates and has an overall column efficiency of 65% (i.e., NTP = 1.3). Following the scrubber, ethyl chloride is finished and sold. The aqueous streams leaving the scrubbers are mixed and recycled to the reactor. A fraction of the CE recycled to the reactor is reduced to ethyl chloride. This side reaction will be called the reduction reaction. The rate of CE depletion in the reactor due to this reaction can be approximated by the following pseudo first order expression ... [Pg.162]

With two of the concentrations in large excess, the fourth-order kinetic expression has been reduced to a first-order one, with considerable mathematical simplification. The experimental design in which all the concentrations save one are set much higher, so that they can be treated as approximate constants, is termed the method of flooding (or the method of isolation, since the dependence on one reagent is thereby isolated). We shall consider the method of flooding further in Section 2.7. Here our concern is with the data analysis it should be evident that the same treatment suffices for first-order and pseudo-first-order kinetics. [Pg.16]

With the concentration of I from the steady-state approximation, the pseudo-first-order rate constant is... [Pg.141]

The chemistry seems fairly simple. The water concentration is high and approximately constant so that the reaction is pseudo-first-order with respect to the epoxy. The rate is also proportional to the hydrogen ion concentration h. Thus,... [Pg.529]

Early studies of ET dynamics at externally biased interfaces were based on conventional cyclic voltammetry employing four-electrode potentiostats [62,67 70,79]. The formal pseudo-first-order electron-transfer rate constants [ket(cms )] were measured on the basis of the Nicholson method [99] and convolution potential sweep voltammetry [79,100] in the presence of an excess of one of the reactant species. The constant composition approximation allows expression of the ET rate constant with the same units as in heterogeneous reaction on solid electrodes. However, any comparison with the expression described in Section II.B requires the transformation to bimolecular units, i.e., M cms . Values of of the order of 1-2 x lO cms (0.05 to O.IM cms ) were reported for Fe(CN)g in the aqueous phase and the redox species Lu(PC)2, Sn(PC)2, TCNQ, and RuTPP(Py)2 in DCE [62,70]. Despite the fact that large potential perturbations across the interface introduce interferences in kinetic analysis [101], these early estimations allowed some preliminary comparisons to established ET models in heterogeneous media. [Pg.203]

The first estimations of for photoinduced processes were reported by Dvorak et al. for the photoreaction in Eq. (40) [157,158]. In this work, the authors proposed that the impedance under illumination could be estimated from the ratio between the AC photopotential under chopped illumination and the AC photocurrent responses. Subsequently, the faradaic impedance was calculated following a treatment similar to that described in Eqs. (22) to (26), i.e., subtracting the impedance under illumination and in the dark. From this analysis, a pseudo-first-order photoinduced ET rate constant of the order of 10 to 10 ms was estimated, corresponding to a rather unrealistic ket > 10 M cms . Considering the nonactivated limit for adiabatic outer sphere heterogeneous ET at liquid-liquid interfaces given by Eq. (17) [5], the maximum bimolecular rate constant is approximately 1000 smaller than the values reported by these authors. [Pg.223]

Equations 9.2-28 and -29, in general, are coupled through equation 9.2-30, and analytical solutions may not exist (numerical solution may be required). The equations can be uncoupled only if the reaction is first-order or pseudo-first-order with respect to A, and exact analytical solutions are possible for reaction occurring in bulk hquid and liquid fdm together and in the liquid film only. For second-order kinetics with reaction occurring only in the liquid film, an approximate analytical solution is available. We develop these three cases in the rest of this section. [Pg.248]

Toth et al. then used laser flash photolysis as a means to determine the value of k x independently of the above study (8). They used 355 nm laser light to photolyze mixtures of C102 and Br2/Br s. Absorption of this light by Br3 led to the prompt formation of Br2, and the subsequent loss of Br2 was monitored by its absorbance at 360 nm. The loss of Br2 occurred with mixed 2nd- and lst-order kinetics due to the parallel 2nd-order self reaction of Br2 and its pseudo-first-order reaction with C102. These experiments led to a value of 3.6 x 109 M 1 s 1 for kh which is in good agreement with the approximate value (1.1 x 109 M 1 s ) originally obtained. [Pg.362]

The quantity and quality of experimental information determined by the new techniques call for the use of comprehensive data treatment and evaluation methods. In earlier literature, quite often kinetic studies were simplified by using pseudo-first-order conditions, the steady-state approach or initial rate methods. In some cases, these simplifications were fully justified but sometimes the approximations led to distorted results. Autoxidation reactions are particularly vulnerable to this problem because of strong kinetic coupling between the individual steps and feed-back reactions. It was demonstrated in many cases, that these reactions are very sensitive to the conditions applied and their kinetic profiles and stoichiometries may be significantly altered by changing the pH, the absolute concentrations and concentration ratios of the reactants, and also by the presence of trace amounts of impurities which may act either as catalysts and/or inhibitors. [Pg.456]

A gas oil is cracked at 630 C and 1 atm by passing vaporized feed through a bed of silica-alumina catalyst spheres with radius 0.088 cm. At a feed rate of 0.2 mol/(h)(cc catalyst bed) conversion was 50%. The reaction is pseudo first order. The effective diffusivity is 0.0008 cm2/s. As an approximation, assume a constant volumetric flow rate. Find the effectiveness of the catalyst. [Pg.770]

Yim et al. (2002) studied the sonlytic degradation of diethyl phtahalate in aqueous solution. Degradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. Monoethyl phthalate, a hydrolysis product of diethyl phthalate, was approximately 3.3 times higher at pH 12 than at pH 7. The investigators concluded that the reaction was affected by pH of the solution. In the presence of ultrasound, the OH radical reaction, thermal reaction, and hydrolysis were all involved during the reaction. [Pg.453]

If Cbo is much larger than C o, Q remains approximately constant at all times, and Eq. 14 approaches Eq. 11 or 12 for the first-order reaction. Thus, the second-order reaction becomes a pseudo first-order reaction. [Pg.44]

Based on this equation, when the pseudo-first-order kinetic constant ( ga) was estimated at 150 Lg of (TSS)J, the half-life of E2 was established to be 0.2 h, with nearly all of the E2 being converted to El. El was removed more slowly at a half-life of 1.5 h and a kinetic constant of approximately 20 L g of (TSS)J, and EE2 was not significantly degraded under those same conditions. By comparison, in similar experiments conducted by Layton et al. (2000) at higher temperamres (30°C), at least 40% of the EE2 was mineralized in activated sludge within 24 h. [Pg.156]

Varea et al. described a study of the stability of procaine hydrochloride in cardioplegie solutions, prepared from Ringer s solution and electrolytes (both un-buffered, or buffered with sodium bicarbonate) [156], The content of the drug was measured by ultraviolet speetrophotometry, and the was found to follow pseudo-first order kinetics. The stability of the drug entity in buffered solutions was estimated to be approximately 5-7 days. [Pg.447]

If we assume that the activity coefficients of X- and H20 are independent of the X- concentration at any given ionic strength, then the usual steady state treatment leads, without further approximation, to Equation 3, a relationship between the pseudo first-order rate constant and the other kinetic parameters. [Pg.32]

Experimental. In order to study the nucleophilic properties of 13 it was necessary to add excess I " to the solutions to prevent precipitation of I2. The rate of formation of CoCCN I-3 was followed spectrophotometrically after the I3 " in aliquots of the solution taken at suitable time intervals was reduced to I by arsenite ion. A typical set of experiments was carried out at 40°C. and unit ionic strength, with all solutions containing 0.5/1/ 1 and variable I3 " at a maximum concentration of 0.28M, the approximate upper limit imposed by solubility restrictions. The results are presented in Figure 3 as a plot of k the symbol used for the pseudo first-order rate constant for this system, vs. l/(lf). It is apparent that 13 is a remarkably efficient nucleophile, with a reaction rate considerably greater than that found for I at comparable concentrations. The points in Figure 3 also show detectable deviation from linearity, despite the limited range of 13 " concentration which was available. [Pg.34]

If an amine P-NH2 is used in the aqueous solution, one obtains RCONHP instead of RCOOH. Rates of cleavage of three acyl nitrophenyl esters were followed by the appearance of p-nitrophenolate ion as reflected by increased absorbances at 400 nm. The reaction was carried out at pH 9.0, in 0.02 M tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer, at 25°C. Rate constants were determined from measurements under pseudo-first-order conditions, with the residue molarity of primary amine present in approximately tenfold excess. First-order rate graphs were linear for at least 80% of the reaction. With nitrophenyl acetate and nitrophenyl caproate, the initial ester concentration was 6.66xlO 5M. With nitrophenyl laur-ate at this concentration, aminolysis by polymer was too fast to follow and, therefore, both substrate and amine were diluted tenfold for rate measurements. [Pg.115]

Under excess of the second reactant (in automobile exhaust gas typically H20, C02 and for lean-burn engines exhaust specifically also 02), the effectiveness factor calculation can be simplified by approximating the reaction rate Rj by a pseudo-first-order rate law with respect to the component using new rate constant kiefj (evaluated from the original rate law)... [Pg.118]

When Cg (i.e., concentration of B which reacts with A) is much larger than C, Cg can be considered approximately constant, and k Cg) can be regarded as the pseudo first-order reaction rate constant (T ). The dimensionless group y, as defined by Equation 6.23, is often designated as the Hatta number (Ha). According to Equation 6.22, if y > 5, it becomes practically equal to E, which is sometimes also called the Hatta number. For this range. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Pseudo-first-order approximation is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.116]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.395 ]




SEARCH



Approximations order

First-order approximation

First-order pseudo

Order pseudo

© 2024 chempedia.info