Propane bonds

It is not well understood how torsional motion of a polymer side group is affected by the rest of the polymer chain in highly dilute solutions. In the case of intramolecular exciplex formation of l-(l-pyrenyl)-3-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl) propane bonded to polystyrene [14], the rate of exciplex formation in dilute polymer solution is much slower than that of a reference small molecule system. 

A typical force field model for propane contains ten bond-stretching terms, eighteen angle-bending terms, eighteen torsional terms and 27 non-bonded interactions. 

Carrying out this proeedure for propane and butane, CH3—CH2—CH3 and CH3—CH2—CH2—CH3, yields the bond matrix and enthalpies of atomization ... 

The bond matrix expresses 2 C—C bonds plus 8 C—H bonds for propane and 3 C—C bonds plus 10 C—H bonds for n-butane. Eaeh enthalpy of atomization is obtained by subtraeting the enthalpy of formation of the alkane from the sum of atomie atomization enthalpies (C 716 H 218 kJ mol ) for that moleeule. For example, the moleeular atomization enthalpy of propane is 3(716) +8(218) — (—104) = 3996 kJ mol . Enthalpies of formation are available from Pedley et al. (1986) or on-line at www.webbook.nist.gov. 

Solve the same problem for propane and isobutane (2-methylpropane). The bond matrix is the same as it is for n-butane, but the enthalpy of formation is somewhat different (n-butane) = —127.1 kJ mol vs. (isobutane) = —134.2... 

In propane, there are two low-frequency ktrsirtnal motions at the C C bonds... 

The addition of active methylene compounds (ethyl malonate, ethyl aoeto-acetate, ethyl plienylacetate, nltromethane, acrylonitrile, etc.) to the aP-double bond of a conjugated unsaturated ketone, ester or nitrile In the presence of a basic catalyst (sodium ethoxide, piperidine, diethylamiiie, etc.) is known as the Michael reaction or Michael addition. The reaction may be illustrated by the addition of ethyl malonate to ethyl fumarate in the presence of sodium ethoxide hydrolysis and decarboxylation of the addendum (ethyl propane-1 1 2 3-tetracarboxylate) yields trlcarballylic acid ... 

The structural features of methane ethane and propane are summarrzed rn Ergure 2 7 All of the carbon atoms have four bonds all of the bonds are srngle bonds and the bond angles are close to tetrahedral In the next sectron we 11 see how to adapt the valence bond model to accommodate the observed structures... 

FIGURE 2 7 Structures of methane ethane and propane showing bond distances and bond angles... 

Bonding m n butane and isobutane continues the theme begun with methane ethane and propane All of the carbon atoms are sp hybridized all of the bonds are ct bonds and the bond angles at carbon are close to tetrahedral This generalization holds for all alkanes regardless of the number of carbons they have... 

In keeping with the bent bond de scription of Figure 3 10 the carbon-carbon bond distance in cycio propane (151 pm) is slightly shorter than that of ethane (153 pm) and cyclohexane (154 pm) The calculated val ues from molecular models (see Learning By Modeling) reproduce these experimen tal values... 

The CIS and trans forms of 1 2 dimethylcyclopropane are stereoisomers Stereoisomers are isomers that have their atoms bonded m the same order—that is they have the same constitution but they differ m the arrangement of atoms m space Stereoiso mers of the cis-trans type are sometimes referred to as geometric isomers You learned m Section 2 18 that constitutional isomers could differ m stability What about stereoisomers We can measure the energy difference between as and trans 1 2 dimethylcyclo propane by comparing their heats of combustion As illustrated m Figure 3 20 the two compounds are isomers and so the difference m their heats of combustion is a direct measure of the difference m their energies Because the heat of combustion of trans 1 2 dimethylcyclopropane is 5 kJ/mol (12 kcal/mol) less than that of its cis stereoisomer it follows that trans 1 2 dimethylcyclopropane is 5 kJ/mol (12 kcal/mol) more stable than as 1 2 dimethylcyclopropane... 

The dissociation energy of the terminal C—H bond m propane is exactly the same as that of ethane The resulting free radical is primary (RCH2) m both cases... 

Note however that Table 4 3 mcludes two entries for propane The second entry corresponds to the cleavage of a bond to one of the hydrogens of the methylene (CH2) group It requires slightly less energy to break a C—H bond m the methylene group than m the methyl group... 

Because the starting material (propane) and one of the products (H ) are the same m both processes the difference m bond dissociation energies is equal to the energy dif ference between an n propyl radical (primary) and an isopropyl radical (secondary) As depicted m Figure 4 20 the secondary radical is 13 kJ/mol (3 kcal/mol) more stable than the primary radical... 

FIGURE 4 20 The bond dis sociation energies of methy lene and methyl C—H bonds in propane reveal difference in stabilities between two isomeric free radicals The secondary radical is more stable than the primary... 

Cleavage of the carbon-carbon bond in ethane yields two methyl radicals whereas propane yields an ethyl radical and one methyl radical Ethyl radical is more stable than methyl and so less energy is required to break the carbon-carbon bond in propane than in ethane The measured carbon-carbon bond dissociation energy in ethane is 368 kJ/mol (88 kcal/mol) and that in propane is 355 kJ/mol (85 kcal/mol)... 

The degree to which allylic radicals are stabilized by delocalization of the unpaired electron causes reactions that generate them to proceed more readily than those that give simple alkyl radicals Compare for example the bond dissociation energies of the pri mary C—H bonds of propane and propene... 

Breaking a bond to a primary hydrogen atom m propene requires less energy by 42 kJ/mol (10 kcal/mol) than m propane The free radical produced from propene is allylic and stabilized by electron delocalization the one from propane is not... 

The decreased shielding caused by electronegative substituents is primarily an inductive effect and like other inductive effects falls off rapidly as the number of bonds between the substituent and the proton increases Compare the chemical shifts of the pro tons m propane and 1 mtropropane... 

Each carbon in propane is bonded to four atoms and is sp hybridized The C—C bonds are a bonds involving overlap of a half filled sp hybrid orbital of one carbon with a half filled sp hybrid orbital of the other The C—H bonds are a bonds involving overlap of a half filled sp hybrid onbital of carbon with a half filled hydrogen li orbital... 

You start building propanal using an sp C from the model kit Note that five dif ferent types of carbon are available Each is defined by a particular number of unfilled valences (these are used to make bonds) and a particular idealized geometry Valences that are not used for bonds are automatically turned into hydrogen atoms so it is nor mally unnecessary to build hydrogens into a model... 

To finish building propanal you need to add two carbons and an oxygen Start by adding another sp C (it should still be selected) and continue by adding an sp C and an sp O Atoms are added by clicking on unfilled valences m the model (the valences turn into bonds)... 

Fig. 3. Adsorption of hydrocarbons by 2eobtes is much greater for unsaturated hydrocarbons whose molecules contain double or triple bonds. From top to bottom, the curves show adsorption (at 150°C) of propjiene, ethylene, acetjiene, and isobutjiene (unsaturated) and propane, ethane, and methane...

At combustion temperatures, the oxidation of butane [106-97-8] is similar to that of propane (153). This is because most butyl radicals are consumed by carbon—carbon bond scission (reaction 28). 

Irradiation of ethyleneimine (341,342) with light of short wavelength ia the gas phase has been carried out direcdy and with sensitization (343—349). Photolysis products found were hydrogen, nitrogen, ethylene, ammonium, saturated hydrocarbons (methane, ethane, propane, / -butane), and the dimer of the ethyleneimino radical. The nature and the amount of the reaction products is highly dependent on the conditions used. For example, the photoproducts identified ia a fast flow photoreactor iacluded hydrocyanic acid and acetonitrile (345), ia addition to those found ia a steady state system. The reaction of hydrogen radicals with ethyleneimine results ia the formation of hydrocyanic acid ia addition to methane (350). Important processes ia the photolysis of ethyleneimine are nitrene extmsion and homolysis of the N—H bond, as suggested and simulated by ab initio SCF calculations (351). The occurrence of ethyleneimine as an iatermediate ia the photolytic formation of hydrocyanic acid from acetylene and ammonia ia the atmosphere of the planet Jupiter has been postulated (352), but is disputed (353). 

---