Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proofs of Structure and Configuration

Although the alcohols are superior to the glycaric (aldaric) acids as derivatives of aldoses for this type of structural proof because of their ease of crystallization, they have one marked deficiency, the low optical rotations. Hence, it is possible to assign erroneously a meso configuration to a substance that is actually optically active (88). Thus, /S-sedoheptitor  [Pg.258]

Fischer, Ann. 270,64 (1892). In this case, the proof was actually based on the corresponding saccharic acids. [Pg.258]

Borax enhances the rotation of alditols (see Chapter IV), but even the use of borax may not be a sufficiently dependable indication, e.g., for D- Ar60-L-gfaZa-octitol (XXII) 86). The observed rotation of this alditol in water using sodium light was 0.0° and in borax it was only —0.5°. [Pg.259]

The use of ammonium molybdate solutions may also be of value for the purpose. The rotations of polyols are nearly constant over a wide range of concentrations when acidified molybdate is used 89a, b). Some values reported by Frferejacque 89a) for D-mannitol are given in Table III. [Pg.259]

The rotations in Table III are reported for [a]646i the value for [ ] is + 141° 89b). Such values are very high for an alditol. It should be noted [Pg.259]


Chemical development Proof of structure and configuration are required as part of the information on chemical development. The methods used at batch release should be validated to guarantee the identity and purity of the substance. It should be established whether a drug produced as a racemate is a true racemate or a conglomerate by investigating physical parameters such as melting point, solubility and crystal properties. The physicochemical properties of the drug substance should be characterized, e.g. crystallinity, polymorphism and rate of dissolution. [Pg.325]

Many tris(diamine)- and cw-diacidobis(diamine)chromium(III) complexes have been resolved into their enantiomers, thus providing proof of structure. Absolute configurations are frequently inferred from ORD and CD measurements, which have become of great importance because they provide quick structural information. The spectra-structure correlations are... [Pg.796]

Experimental support for the hypothesis that melezitose may be a substituted sucrose came from determinations of the ring structures and configurations of the individual sugar components involved. Actually, final proof was not achieved for the lack of a single point of information. [Pg.280]

Both methods of approach moreover proved that a series of methylated derivatives of D-glucosamine described by Cutler, Haworth and Peat,14 and most useful as reference compounds in this field, were all of the pyranose configuration. Further proof of the pyranose structure of methyl D-glucosaminide and methyl N-acetyl-D-glucosaminide was pro-... [Pg.185]

A rigorous structural proof of the insecticidal exotoxin (34) from Bacillus thurin-giensis has now been published,107 confirming the a-configuration of the glucosidic bond. The total synthesis of (34) is further confirmation of the correctness of the structural assignment.108 The exotoxin inhibits RNA synthesis in insects and animals and affects the incorporation of orotic acid into nuclear RNA.109... [Pg.148]

The Mills-Nixon hypothesis that small ring annelation on benzene would induce bond fixation (bond alternation) by trapping out one Kekul6 tautomer is a casualty of early twentieth century structural chemistry. Due to a lack of direct methods for analyzing molecular structure, structural postulates of that time were often supported by an analysis of product distributions. An experimental observable such as product selectivity or isomer count was correlated to an unobservable structural feature derived on the basis of a chemical model. Classical successes of this method are van t Hoff s proof of the tetrahedral carbon atom and Fischer s proof for the configuration of sugars. In the case of Mills and Nixon, however, the paradigm broke down. [Pg.210]

Since Dickinson s first determinations, crystal structures of many other complexes of various coordination numbers have been determined. All these investigations and others have provided a complete and direct confirmation of Werner s views to support his indirect configurational proofs obtained during the previous decades by preparation of isomers and resolution of optically active compounds (see Section 1.1.4), and today the terminology and concepts of coordination theory are routinely used in crystallography. [Pg.16]

An isomerization reaction closely similar to that observed with indole alkaloids has been noted with oxindole alkaloids. Due to their facile isomerization, it is pharmacologically difficult to test the individual oxindole isomers expected to have different activities. Instead of epimerization the term isomerization has been used with oxindole alkaloids since inversion of configuration can occur in more than one asymmetric centre. Isomerization was employed mainly to provide structural proof of different oxindole epimers isolated in nature. As early as 1959, Wenkert and co-workers [42] proposed a mechanism for the isomerization of oxindole alkaloids, Scheme (17). Almost simultaneously, Seaton et al. [43] reported analogous findings. [Pg.25]

Of these, 11 is achiral (meso), whereas 10 is chiral. Therefore, by simply determining which oxidation product is optically active, and hence chiral, we can assign the configurations of 8 and 9. Direct comparison of these synthetic aldopentoses with the naturally occurring compounds then could be used as proof of the structure of natural aldopentoses. By this reasoning 8 turns out to be D-arabinose and 9 is D-ribose. [Pg.912]

We shall prepare the various building blocks of the catalyst surface and study them separately. Then we put the parts together and the resultant structure should have all of the properties of the working catalyst particle. Just as in the case of synthetic insulin or the B12 molecule, the proof that the synthesis was successful is in the identical performance of the synthesized and natural products. Our building blocks are crystal surfaces with well-characterized atomic surface structure and composition. Cutting these crystals in various directions permits us to vary their surface structure systematically and to study the chemical reactivity associated with each surface structure. If we do it properly, all of the surface sites and microstructures with unique chemical activity can be identified this way. Then, by preparing a surface where all of these sites are simultaneously present in the correct configurations and concentrations the chemical behavior of the catalyst particle can be reproduced. The real value of this synthetic approach is that ultimately one should be able to synthesize a catalyst that is much more selective since we build into it only the desirable active sites in a controlled manner. [Pg.4]

One of the major points advanced by Kuhn and von Grundherr for the substituted-sucrose structure of melezitose was the extreme ease of acid hydrolysis of one of the linkages, which had earlier led Alekhine to the discovery of turanose and the trisaccharide nature of melezitose. For years this feature was accepted as virtual proof of the presence of sucrose in the melezitose molecule. However, the opinion that the ease of hydrolysis was evidence for the furanoid form of the D-fructose ring lost all validity with the discovery by Purves and Hudson1 that methyl D-fructopyranoside is hydrolyzed by acids with the same ease as methyl D-fructofuranoside moreover, the ease of hydrolysis never was evidence concerning the a- or /3-configuration of the D-fructose unit in melezitose. ... [Pg.280]

Details of the structure proof of cancentrine (28) have appeared (14), and the absolute configuration has been determined by X-ray study of a derivative (15). [Pg.7]


See other pages where Proofs of Structure and Configuration is mentioned: [Pg.1079]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.2918]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.1079]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.2918]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.8]   


SEARCH



Proofing

Structural Proof

Structural configuration

Structure proof

© 2024 chempedia.info