Projective field equations

The affine form of the projective field equations is shown (Veblen Hoff-mann, 1930) to be ... 

The purpose of projective relativity is to derive the equivalent of Einstein s field equations in homogeneous projective coordinates, which requires definition of projective scalars, vectors, displacements, connections and tensors in projective space. Such procedures are described in detail in the monograph. 

In projective relativity the field equations contain, in addition to the gravitational and electromagnetic fields, also the relativistic wave equation of Schrodinger and, as shown by Hoffinann (1931), are consistent with Dirac s equation, although the correct projective form of the spin operator had clearly not been found. The problem of spin orientation presumably relates to the appearance of the extra term, beyond the four electromagnetic and ten gravitational potentials, in the field equations. It correlates with the time asymmetry of the magnetic field and spin. 

As mentioned before it is conjectured that in projective relativity theory the coefficients gij of the conic equation are gravitational potentials and the coefficients of the hyperplane equation are electromagnetic potentials. We shall see, in fact, that the closest field equations for the 7, 3 are a combination of the classical Einstein gravitation equations and the Maxwell field equations. 

We shall now separate equations (1) into their affine parts. The left side of (1) represents a projective tensor Tap so that we can also write the field equations in the abbreviated form... 

By this procedure F is built from 11. in the same way as is built from (Bibl. 1930, 9). One of the equations so obtained is identical to Schrodinger s equation of quantum theory. It therefore seems possible that a unification of quantum theory and projective field theory can be achieved in this direction. Of course it is unsatisfactory that the consistency of equation (11) has still not been proven. Furthermore it has up to now not been possible to derive the equations from a four-dimensional variation principle. Finally the physical meaning of the equations causes problems. 

The associated projective spaces serve as an aid to the introduction of homogeneous coordinates. If the existence of the mapping (1) or rather (3) is not assumed beforehand we only retrieve a theory of the associated spaces. The setting up of our field equations is also independent of (1). However, the connection between the associated spaces and special cmves, planes, etc. of the underlying space is not established without the mapping (3) or another suitable assumption. So, for instance, is the correspondence between a cmve... 

Detailed solution of the field equations of projective relativity is not known, but has been shown to give a unfied description of gravity, electromagnetism and wave mechanics, in which the golden ratio occurs as a descriptor of space-time curvature. 

From a chemical perspective the most important cosmological evidence includes the relationship between the periodicity of matter, prime numbers, Farey sequences, other aspects of number theory, cosmic abundance of the elements and nucleogenesis. These emerging periodic patterns are diametrically opposed to accepted explanations based on standard cosmology, but well in line with Veblen s projective relativity theory, Godel s solution of the general relativistic field equations and Segal s chronometric alternative to Hubble s law. 

U.S. NRC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2008. TRACE V5.0 Theory Manual, Field Equations, Solution Methods and Physical Models. Draft Report. Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC. Pdf File created August 15, 2007. Available on NRC s onhne document retrieval system ADAMS since February 2009 with Reference No. ML071000097 . 

The field- and time-dependent cluster operator is defined as T t, ) = nd HF) is the SCF wavefunction of the unperturbed molecule. By keeping the Hartree-Fock reference fixed in the presence of the external perturbation, a two step approach, which would introduce into the coupled cluster wavefunction an artificial pole structure form the response of the Hartree Fock orbitals, is circumvented. The quasienergy W and the time-dependent coupled cluster equations are determined by projecting the time-dependent Schrodinger equation onto the Hartree-Fock reference and onto the bra states (HF f[[exp(—T) ... 

Here Uq is the value of the potential on the surface. It is proper to notice that potentials of the attraction field and the centrifugal force usually vary on the level surface of the gravitational field. Changing the value of the constant, Uq, we obtain different level surfaces, including one which coincides in the ocean with the free undisturbed surface of the water and, as was pointed out earlier, this is called the geoid. As follows from Equation (2.73) the projection of the field g on any direction / is related to the potential U by... 

Let X be a smooth projective variety of dimension d over an algebraically closed field k. In this section we want to define a variety D (X) of second order data of m-dimensional subvarieties of X for any non-negative integer m < d. A general point of D ln X) will correspond to the second order datum of the germ of a smooth m-dimensional subvariety Y C X in a point x X, i.e. to the quotient of Ox,x- Assume for the moment that the ground field is C and x Y C X, X is a smooth complex d-manifold and we have local coordinates zi,..., at x. Then Y is given by equations... 

In Equation 12.6 p, is the permanent dipole moment, h is Planck s constant, I the moment of inertia, j the angular momentum quantum number, and M and K the projection of the angular momentum on the electric field vector or axis of symmetry of the molecule, respectively. Obviously if the electric field strength is known, and the j state is reliably identified (this can be done using the Stark shift itself) it is possible to determine the dipole moment precisely. The high sensitivity of the method enables one to measure differences in dipole moments between isotopes and/or between ground and excited vibrational states (and in favorable cases dipole differences between rotational states). Dipole measurements precise to 0.001 D, or better, for moments in the range 0.5-2D are typical (Table 12.1). 

The conceptually similar COMBINE approach was developed by Wade et al. [85] on the basis of the analysis of force-field energy contributions per amino acid to describe interaction differences to a congeneric set of ligands. The resulting predictive regression equations were also reported for applications in structure-based design projects [86-88]. 

Figure 3.2. Equilibrium linear susceptibility in reduced units X = x Hi[/m) versus temperature for three different ellipsoidal systems with equation x ja +y lb + jc < I, resulting in a system of N dipoles arranged on a simple cubic lattice. The points shown are the projection of the spins to the xz plane. The probing field is applied along the anisotropy axes, which are parallel to the z axis. The thick lines indicate the equilibrium susceptibility of the corresponding noninteracting system (which does not depend on the shape of the system and is the same in the three panels) thin lines show the susceptibility including the corrections due to the dipolar interaction obtained by thermodynamic perturbation theory [Eq. (3.22)] the symbols represent the susceptibility obtained with a Monte Carlo method. The dipolar interaction strength is itj = d/ 2o = 0.02.

---