Product inhibition Steady-State Ordered

Hexokinase does not yield parallel reciprocal plots, so the Ping Pong mechanism can be discarded. However, initial velocity studies alone will noi discriminate between the rapid equilibrium random and steady-state ordered mechanisms. Both yield ihe same velocity equation and families of intersecting reciprocal plots. Other diagnostic procedures must be used (e.g., product inhibition, dead-end inhibition, equilibrium substrate binding, and isotope exchange studies). These procedures are described in detail in the author s Enzyme Kinetics behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems, Wiley-Interscience (1975),... 

An example for the second (Eq. (6.26)) and the third case (Eq. (6.27)), is also described in Chapter 11 (Section 11.4). It occurs in a Steady-State Ordered Bi Bi system with a dead-end EAP-complex. In this system, the inhibition by the product P is S-parabolic /-linear noncompetitive when the substrate B is variable (and A constant), and the rate equation has the form of Eq. (6.27). The inhibition pattern becomes S-linear /-parabolic noncompetitive, when A is variable (and B constant), and the rate equation takes the form of Eq. (6.26). 

A second ternary complex reaction mechanism is one in which there is a compulsory order to the substrate binding sequence. Reactions that conform to this mechanism are referred to as bi-bi compulsory ordered ternary complex reactions (Figure 2.13). In this type of mechanism, productive catalysis only occurs when the second substrate binds subsequent to the first substrate. In many cases, the second substrate has very low affinity for the free enzyme, and significantly greater affinity for the binary complex between the enzyme and the first substrate. Thus, for all practical purposes, the second substrate cannot bind to the enzyme unless the first substrate is already bound. In other cases, the second substrate can bind to the free enzyme, but this binding event leads to a nonproductive binary complex that does not participate in catalysis. The formation of such a nonproductive binary complex would deplete the population of free enzyme available to participate in catalysis, and would thus be inhibitory (one example of a phenomenon known as substrate inhibition see Copeland, 2000, for further details). When substrate-inhibition is not significant, the overall steady state velocity equation for a mechanism of this type, in which AX binds prior to B, is given by Equation (2.16) ... 

Kinetics of O-Methylaiion. The steady state kinetic analysis of these enzymes (41,42) was consistent with a sequential ordered reaction mechanism, in which 5-adenosyl-L-methionine and 5-adenosyl-L-homocysteine were leading reaction partners and included an abortive EQB complex. Furthermore, all the methyltransferases studied exhibited competitive patterns between 5-adenosyl-L-methionine and its product, whereas the other patterns were either noncompetitive or uncompetitive. Whereas the 6-methylating enzyme was severely inhibited by its respective flavonoid substrate at concentrations close to Km, the other enzymes were less affected. The low inhibition constants of 5-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (Table I) suggests that earlier enzymes of the pathway may regulate the rate of synthesis of the final products. 

TABLE 11.5 Cleland nomenclature for bisubstrate reactions exemplified. Three common kinetic mechanisms for bisubstrate enzymatic reactions are exemplified. The forward rate equations for the order bi bi and ping pong bi hi are derived according to the steady-state assumption, whereas that of the random bi bi is based on the quasi-equilibrium assumption. These rate equations are first order in both A and B, and their double reciprocal plots (1A versus 1/A or 1/B) are linear. They are convergent for the order bi bi and random bi bi but parallel for the ping pong bi bi due to the absence of the constant term (KiaKb) in the denominator. These three kinetic mechanisms can be further differentiated by their product inhibition patterns (Cleland, 1963b)... 

In the initial fermentation experiments, lipstatin was obtained in low time-volume yield of a few milligrams per litre. With an understanding of the biosynthesis, it became possible to increase the product concentration to 150 mg/1 per 138 hom-s by specificly dosed supplementation of the fermentation broth with fatty acids and leucine. In order to avoid inhibition, it appears important to maintain alow steady-state concentration of the substrates by slow addition. [264,265] For industrial production, however, these time-volume yields are still too low, at least by a factor of 500. 

Isomerization of a stable enzyme form does not affect the algebraic form of the rate equation in the absence of products, but product inhibition patterns are modified so that the order of addition of substrates and release of products can not be determined by steady-state kinetic experiments. Rate constants for steps involving the isomerizing stable form or any central complex are not determinable, and steady-state distributions can be calculated only for non-isomerizing... 

Label from P can appear in the corresponding substrate even in the absence of Q. All that is needed is the presence of a sufficient level of EQ in the steady state. The exchange of label from Q into a substrate will not occur unless a significant concentration of P is present. Thus, one can test both products separately at levels at or above their inhibition constants, and establish the order of product release. Thus, the order of product release can be established the first product released is that which exchanges with a substrate in the absence of the another product, and the second product released is that which does not. If both products show exchange, than their release must be random. 

The catalytic dehydration of isopropanol was studied under tiansirat conditimis in a catalytic microreactor. The reaction is characterised by educt inhibition and shows a pronounced stop-effect . Therefore, the average productivity under forced poiodic operation can be considerably higher compared to the maximal productivity obtainable at steady state. For high rates of the sorption processes and surface reactions involved, the timal cycle time for the forced concentration variations lies in the order of seconds. As microreactors are characterized by low mass storage capacity and narrow residence time distribution, they are particularly suitable for periodic operation at relatively high fiequencies. Tis could be demonstrated in the present study. 

One important clue to the mechanism is the rate law for the overall reaction the dependence of the rate of product formation on the concentrations of the critical components of the catalytic system, such as the catalyst, reagents, products, and cocatalyst. The reaction is often of order 1 with respect to catalyst concentration, but if it is of order 1/2 or 2 one may suspect dissociation or dimerization steps for the catalyst, required to transform it from the species present in majority in solution to the active catalyst. Reagents also often show first-order behavior, one interpretation of which would be that these reagents must bind to the catalyst majority species before the turnover-limiting step. A full kinetic analysis with standard steady state assumptions is used to compare the observed rate law with each proposed mechanism. Product inhibition, also seen in many cases, implies that as the product builds up it binds to the catalyst, decreasing the fraction of... 

---