Probability Distribution Tools

Probability functions provide full-length stories about states and likelihoods. Moments and cumulants furnish thumbnail sketches. For a random variable X having a finite number of possible x values, the moments are obtained by weighted summations the cumulants follow via slightly more complicated formulae. The nth moment is given by  

The first moment is then simply the average or expectation of x. Strictly speaking, X need not be one of the members of the sample population. For example, golfers shoot integer scores with noninteger averages. 

The first cumulant K also equates simply with x. The second Ki is given by  

This quantity is tied to the spread of the probability distribution and is referred to as the variance The square root of the variance is encountered early and often in science education and is named the standard deviation (o). 

The third cumulant connects with the symmetry—or more typically the lack 

---

When the underlying distribution is not known, tools such as histograms, probability curves, piecewise polynomial approximations, and general techniques are available to fit distributions to data. It may be necessary to assume an appropriate distribution in order to obtain the relevant parameters. Any assumptions made should be supported by manufacturer s data or data from the literature on similar items working in similar environments. Experience indicates that some probability distributions are more appropriate in certain situations than others. What follows is a brief overview on their applications in different environments. A more rigorous discussion of the statistics involved is provided in the CPQRA Guidelines. ... 

The reality of risk assessment in investment for new processes is somewhat more complex than this. The specific innovations are often not discrete and the confidence of success of each item is a probability distribution rather than a single value. Techniques to handle the mathematical aspects have been available for many years [61] and computational tools are now readily available. A detailed coverage of managing uncertainty is beyond the scope of the current text and this simplistic approach suffices to address the key question of how to effectively manage the N-and C-values. 

The preceding applications furnish a small, albeit representative sample of a nonparametric treatment of electrochemical observations when their probabilistic properties are unknown, or if no specific a-priori probability distribution can be associated with them. D-statistic based techniques have much to offer to the electrochemical process analyst, but a full exploration of this useful tool remains a subject of future research. 

Generating functions are coming into widespread use as methodological tools [385]. They may be used to obtain numerical summary measures of probability distributions in an analytical form by computing its moments and cumulants. For the nonnegative integer-valued random variable X (t) ... 

This concept can be used to translate Delphic or other opinions into probability distributions and hence into useful decision-making tools. 

Observe Figure 1.2. This figure definitely shows some form of pattern, but is not of such a character that meaningful values can be obtained directly for design purposes. If enough data of this pattern is available, however, they may be subjected to a statistical analysis to predict design values, or probability distribution analysis, which uses the tools of probability. Only two rules of probability apply to our present problem the addition rule and the multiplication rule. 

An additional tool for Langevin dynamics in the constant pressure-constant temperature ensemble (NpT) has been developed by Quigley and Probert.15 Their system is based upon an extended Hamiltonian framework developed by Hoover16 but an extension is also made to incorporate the Parrinello and Rahman scheme.17,18 They furthermore develop a suitable integrator based upon Liouville time evolution operators. Their scheme provides good sampling of the available phase space and generates the required probability distribution. 

Simulation All business processes have random components. Sales may take one value or another. A machine may or may not fail. Often these random, or stochastic, elements of a problem make analyzing it very difficult. In these cases, simulation is often an effective tool to help with decisions. In simulation, a model of the process is created on a computer. Each of the random elements of the model (sales, failures, etc.) is specified with a probability distribution. When the model is run, the computer simulates carrying out the process. Each time a random event occurs, the computer uses the specified probability distribution to randomly decide what happens. 

Statistical tools also exist for estimating the difference between, or testing an assumption about, the means or variances of two or more probability distributions. These tools are natural extensions of the tools developed for estimating and testing hypotheses about single populations. 

From a computational point of view, it should be stressed that the computational tool of Francisco et al. [35] results in obtaining the electron number probability distribution functions of an -electron molecule through an exhaustive partitioning of the real space into arbitrary regions. From the computed probabilities, several magnitudes relevant to chemical bonding theory are obtained, such as average electronic populations and locahzation/delocalization indices. 

At the macroscopic level, information is quantified via multivariable functions, line integrals, and probability distributions—the tools central to Chapters 3 through 5. The thermodynamic situations that admit analytical solutions are rare. Approximations are necessary with the assistance of computer programming and spreadsheets. 

Monte Carlo analysis (MCA) can be used in conjunction with LCA to estimate variability and uncertainty. MCA is a tool that simulates a probable range of outcomes from given probability distributions for input variables and can be applied within an LCA framework to capture LCI parameter variability and uncertainty. With the use of MCA, any independent variable with a range of estimates or possible values can be assigned a probability distribution. Output distributions are generated by repeatedly and randomly sampling values from the probability distributions. A simulated outcome distribution can show the most likely scenario, as well as extreme cases that occur infrequently. Monte Carlo analysis within an LCI framework allows the capture of parameter variability and uncertainty. LCIA tools have variability and uncertainty in their factors, as well as uncertainty associated with the model itself (i.e., uncertainty associated with assumptions or boundaries used to construct the model). However, most LCIA tools do not include... 

In this chapter, a summary of some of the new design principles and tools that can help to match the society demands are presented. Based on risk analysis and decision theory, the problem of an integrated coastal and harbor management is formulated. The new approach is applied to evaluate the probability distribution of the coasthne in V years in a stretch of coast in the south of Spain. Next, the... 

The general structure of the theoretical tool of ST should now be quite clear. For each set of independent variables we define a partition function. This partition function is related to a thermodynamic quantity through one of the fundamental relationships. On the other hand, each of the summands in the PF is proportional to the probability of realizing the specific value of the variable on which the summation is carried out. Having the probability distribution, for each set of independent variables, one can write down various averages over that distribution function. The calculation of such averages consists of the main outcome of ST. 

Modeling is probably the tool of excellence for engineers (Chapter 9). It is used to simulate the reaction and the process system in order to shorten the time for development. It is based on models that can be physical or chemical, semi-empirical or empirical, descriptive or more fundamental. To describe the development of the molecular weight distribution upon reaction, moment methods or equations based on population balance are often used. 

Meyer M.A. Booker, J.M. 1991. Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment—a practical guide. ASA-SIAM. Morris, D.E, Oakley, J.E, Crowe, J.A. 2013. A web-based tool for elidting probability distributions from experts. Environmental Modelling Software 52 (2014), p 1-4. 

The input F(x) in Equation 6.65 depends on the specifics of the ttansport process. For a given stochastic process of the general type given by Equation 6.50, or for a prescribed free energy landscape. Equation 6.65 is to be solved with appropriate boundary conditions. From such calculations, details about the probability distribution function and averages of the quantities associated with the translocation process can be obtained. We shall return to this calculational tool repeatedly for different experimental situations to be discussed in later chapters. 

Tempted by the interpretation of the Kullback-Leibler expression (9.78) as a tool to distinguish two probability distributions, the possibility of using it to compare atomic density functions is explored. To make a physically motivated choice of the reference density Po x) we consider the construction of Sanderson s electronegativity scale [63], which is based on the compactness of the electron cloud. Sanderson introduced a hypothetical noble gas atom with an average density scaled by the number of electrons. This gives us the argument to use renormalized noble gas densities as reference in expression (9.78). This gives us the quantity... 

---