Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pressure drop vs. time

Results of the Dynamic Foam Tests. Typical plots of pressure drop vs. time for the dynamic foam tests are given in Figure 3. The initial sharp rise in... [Pg.390]

The numerical results obtained from simultaneous integration of (1) and (7) are shown in figs 1—3 for a planar cavity cluster at Pm = 20-103 Pa with f = a /27r = 20 kHz when = 0.3 mm. It is apparent from fig. 1 that initially the tensile stress in the cluster drops exponentially with the distance from the cluster boundary [1], but after 4 fjs the pressure profile steepens near the boundary due to the significant growth of the cavities here. The tensile stress decays beyond the first few cavity "layers" where growth of the cavities primarily occurs. The profile of increase of cavity radius vs. position is found to be essentially exponential, fig. 2. The pressure assumed from (15) is set up if an incident acoustic wave with a pressure Api vs. time t as shown in fig. 3 reaches the cluster boundary. It is noticed that very quickly the reflection coefficient approaches —1, showing that the boundary becomes an essentially compliant interface. [Pg.432]

The polymer tested in laboratory experiments in Problem 5.3 is to be injected into an unconsolidated sand formation down casing. Table 5.69 gives the reservoir data. Injection of polymer into this well at a rate of 500 B/D is desired. Compare pressure drop between the injection well and an observation well located 216 ft away. The reservoir is watered out and at ROS. Estimate the pressure drop as a function of volume of polymer injected for the first 15,000 bbl of polymer. Plot pressure drop vs. volume of polymer injected and time of injection. Polymer retention is neglected, and there is no skin in the well. [Pg.81]

C. Large-scale oxidation protocol. The large-scale oxidations reactions were carried out in a 300mL Parr autoclave equipped with an injection port, a thermocouple port, a septa sealed addition port and port connected to the volumetric measurement and gas supply module. The module consists of a forward pressure regulator and a calibrated ballast reservoir. The pressure in the reactor and in the ballast reservoir is monitored constantly and the pressure drop in the ballast reservoir is constantly converted into moles of oxygen uptake recorded vs. the time. [Pg.129]

Ap Frictional pressure drop Pa CO Characteristic frequency or reciprocal time scale of flow Vs... [Pg.501]

A better alternative is a low value of v. This approach provides more contact time for sorbate-sorbent equilibrium and a lower pressure drop across the bed. In practice, this translates to the use of short bed lengths of large diameter (low Us), in contrast to long, small-diameter beds (high Vs). The pressure drop across the bed can be estimated using the Ergun equation ... [Pg.196]

In Figure 22.23, a plot of p xq vs. co is illustrated for a constant pressure filtration in which R, is not negligible. As Ap increases with time, the slope of the curve and also increase. The total resistance is given by the curve ABD, and the cake resistance R is represented by BC. In accord with Equation (22.3), is obtained by dividing R by co (AO- As point moves up the curve, the angle of the triangle ABC increases and ultimately approaches the slope given by BD. The pressure drop across the cake can be calculated from... [Pg.1622]

In a flow system, the rate parameters can therefore be determined in two essentially independent ways. (1) From the pressure drop as a function of time, as indicated on the previous page. (2) By measuring the amount of gas desorbed after different adsorption intervals At. Differentiating the curve of n vs At obtained under reproducible flow conditions then yields the net rate of adsorption. This can again be separated into contributions from adsorption and desorption rates by determining the pressure dependence. [Pg.265]

It is also desirable to be able to vary and control the thickness of the plies. As there are two or more extruders feeding the separate inlet channels, the first step is to calibrate them in terms of output rate vs. screw speed. As previously discussed, gear pumps can be used. The next step is to establish the required width to thickness and takeoff speed, and convert this value into an output rate for each resin. From such output rates and calibration curves, screw speeds are established. When a feedblock is not designed properly, problems such as excessive pressure drops, shear rates, or residence time can affect the quality of the extrudate. The tear-drop shape manifold has proved beneficial for coextrusion (see Fig. 3-12a, part 4). [Pg.134]

As soon as the time reaches a value such that t > r/Vs (where r is the horizontal radius of the drop, which remains constant as long as > 0 ) the pressure becomes practically constant again throughout the drop. According to Laplace, the curvature of the profile must be constant as well. We then recover a spherical cap, albeit with an angle 0 t) less than the initial angle 6e We can in fact relate 6 t) to the volume of the drop. At time t, the volume is... [Pg.239]

Fig. 5.80 shows results illustrating behavior in porous medium for a polyacrylamide/Cr(III)/redox system. The data were taken by flowing the gel system at a steady rate through an unconsolidated sandpack. The gel system was mixed at the inlet of the sandpack with an in-line mixer. Pressure drop was measured along the sandpack and converted to apparent viscosity by use of Darcy s law. Apparent viscosity is plotted vs. distance at different times for the gel system up to about 240 hours. [Pg.54]

MCR 301 and Vilastic V-E rheometers at shear rates between 0.01 and 1,000 s". For the xanthan solution, the viscosity at low shear rates exhibited a plateau value of 8 (i.e., 8 cp or a flow resistance 8 times greater than water solid curve in Fig. 2). Consequently, on the basis of viscosity (vs. shear rate) data, we expected to see Newtonian (flow-rate-independent) behavior at low flux values. Instead, in 55-md Berea sandstone, resistance factors at low flux reached as high as 30 (solid circles in Fig. 2). This behavior was also reported for xanthan solutions by Cannella et al. (1988) and Hejri et al. (1991). In 269-md Berea and 5120-md porons polyethylene, we did not achieve sufficiently low velocities to observe this phenomenon (because of limitations in the accuracy of our pressure transducers at low pressure drops). [Pg.113]


See other pages where Pressure drop vs. time is mentioned: [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.3967]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.1298]    [Pg.3973]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.1176]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.239]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.390 , Pg.392 , Pg.393 ]




SEARCH



Drop time

Time Pressure

Vs. pressure

Vs. time

© 2024 chempedia.info