Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential parameters standard

Here, i is the faradaic current, n is the number of electrons transferred per molecule, F is the Faraday constant, A is the electrode surface area, k is the rate constant, and Cr is the bulk concentration of the reactant in units of mol cm-3. In general, the rate constant depends on the applied potential, and an important parameter is ke, the standard rate constant (more typically designated as k°), which is the forward rate constant when the applied potential equals the formal potential. Since there is zero driving force at the formal potential, the standard rate constant is analogous to the self-exchange rate constant of a homogeneous electron-transfer reaction. [Pg.382]

The Butler-Volmer rate law has been used to characterize the kinetics of a considerable number of electrode electron transfers in the framework of various electrochemical techniques. Three figures are usually reported the standard (formal) potential, the standard rate constant, and the transfer coefficient. As discussed earlier, neglecting the transfer coefficient variation with electrode potential at a given scan rate is not too serious a problem, provided that it is borne in mind that the value thus obtained might vary when going to a different scan rate in cyclic voltammetry or, more generally, when the time-window parameter of the method is varied. [Pg.57]

Recently, both hirsutine (85) and dihydrocorynantheine (86) were found to be active when the effects of these compounds on the action potentials of sino-atrial node, atrium and ventricle tissues were studied with standard microelectrode techniques [65]. In sino-atrial node preparations, both compounds concentration-dependently increased cycle length, decreased the slope of the pacemaker depolarization, decreased the maximum rate of rise and prolonged action potential duration. Thus, it was for the first time shown that hirsutine and dihydrocorynantheine have direct inhibitory effects on the cardiac pacemaker. In atrial and ventricular preparations, both compounds concentration-dependently decreased the maximum rate of rise and prolonged action potential duration. Although stereochemically different, these two alkaloids exhibited no difference in their effects on various myocardial action potential parameters. Dihydrocorynantheine also displays potent a-adrenoceptor blocking activity, while hirsutine is inactive [66]. Experiments with ion channels indicate that the mechanisms for these two phenomena probably differ. The direct effects of hirsutine and dihydrocorynantheine on the action potential of cardiac muscle through inhibition of multiple ion channels may explain the negative chronotropic and antiarrhythmic activities of these two alkaloids. [Pg.32]

As in BV, the MHC model describes the electrode kinetics as a function of three parameters the formal potential, the standard heterogeneous rate constant, and the reorganization energy. Nevertheless, important differences can be observed between the two kinetic models with respect to the variation of the rate constants with the applied potential. Whereas in BV rate constants vary exponentially and... [Pg.37]

Estimate the corrosion potential corr and the corrosion current density icorr of Zn in a deaerated HC1 solution of pH 1 at 298 K. In this solution Zn corrosion is accompanied by the hydrogen evolution reaction (h.c.r.). The parameters (standard electrode potential E°, exchange current density i0, Tafel slope b of Zn dissolution and the h.e.r. on Zn are... [Pg.265]

The van der Waals interaction was refit for H2 adsorption in SWNT by first fitting the L-J parameters for H-H interactions to the recent high level ab initio results on interactions between H2 molecules reported by Diep and Johnson,27 yielding the center of mass separation of 3.4 A, and the Lennard-Jones parameters nonbonding interaction between carbons is not expected to have a pronounced effect on the H2 adsorption energy and thus we retain the standard AIREBO potential parameters of [Pg.472]

The E value reflects the stabilization energy of the negative charge by surrounding solvent molecules. Thus its variation by solvation can be used as one of the solvent parameters. Since reaction 1 is nothing but a one-electron oxidation reaction, E can also be called optical oxidation potential The standard oxidation potential value is often diffrcult to be determined because many redox reactions are not reversible. Therefore, the E value should be a good alternative as a measure of redox reactivity for which the equilibrium redox potential is not known. [Pg.409]

Chapter 4 is a slight digression in which I point out the physical significance of the four standard potential parameters used in the LMTO programme, and discuss the limitations of the parametrisations introduced. In... [Pg.24]

The three first parameters in the standard set may be found in terms of the original D, , and by means of (3.45,46,17), while the fourth parameter gives the width of the energy window (3.53). We prefer to use these standard potential parameters because they depend little upon the choice of E, have physically simple interpretations, and vary in a systematic way from element to element across the periodic table. [Pg.48]

As an example of a set of standard parameters, Table 4.1 lists all the potential-dependent information needed to perform an energy-band calculation for (non-magnetic) chromium metal. In the following, chromium is used as an example when we discuss the physical significance of each of the four potential parameters (4.1). At the end of the chapter we derive free-electron potential parameters, give expressions for the volume derivatives of some se-... [Pg.48]

Table 4.1. Standard potential parameters for non-magnetic chromium at S = 2.684 a.u., from [4.1]. Here Ev is relative to the Coulomb potential at S. This is a natural choice since for a monoatomic material in the ASA the spheres are neutral and their charge density is spherically symmetric. Relative to this energy zero, v(S) = -0.8181 Ry... [Pg.49]

The potential parameters for the free-electron case are interesting for several reasons. First of all they are easy to calculate analytically from standard expressions for the spherical Bessel functions [4.2] and therefore useful in order-of-magnitude estimates. Secondly, they may be used in empty-lattice tests of the LMTO method in order to indicate the accuracy of that method in various applications. Such tests are also useful for programme debugging purposes. Thirdly, muffin-tin orbitals with free-electron parameters are used in Sect.6.9 to derive a correction to the atomic-sphere approxir mation. [Pg.56]

Table 4.5. Standard potential parameters for free electrons. D = , v = 0,... Table 4.5. Standard potential parameters for free electrons. D = , v = 0,...
The next NL lines contain and the four standard potential parameters defined by (4.1). To be able to specify = 0 the fourth parameter must be given as < >2. If the primitive cell holds more than one atom, each extra atom should be.described by data analogous to the above NL + 2 lines. [Pg.192]

The third step is to generate radial wave functions and the corresponding potential parameters. To this end, the programme solves the Dirac equation without the spin-orbit interaction (Sect.9.6.1) using the trial potential. Hence, the programme includes the important relativistic mass-velocity and Darwin shifts. The potential parameters are calculated from (3.33-35) and then converted to standard parameters by the formulae in Sect. 4.6. The energy derivatives are calculated from the solutions of the Dirac equation at two energies, E + e and E - e, where e is some small fraction of the relevant bandwidth. [Pg.218]

Upon completion, the programme will print the four standard potential parameters per z9 some other potential parameters, e.g. masses and band edges, zeroth-, first-, and second-order moments of the state density, and partial and total pressures. If the potential parameters in the original run of LMTO have been suitably chosen, one will have a reasonably converged result after just one execution of SCFC. If this is not the case, one must use the output potential parameters to perform new band-structure and state-density calculations, and then repeat SCFC with the new state densities. [Pg.219]

C FILE 4 IS A STANDARD POTENTIAL PARAMETER FILE USED ... [Pg.222]

In this chapter we list the four standard potential parameters (4.1) for 61 metals as obtained in self-consistent LMTO calculations using the exchange-correlation potential given by von Barth and Hedin [10.1]. Table 10.1 containing parameters for d-transition metals was prepared by O.K. Andersen and D. Glotzel, whom we wish to thank for permission to quote these results. Table 10.2 was prepared by the author. [Pg.261]

Figure 3 Effect of the dimensionless parameter j/ on cyclic voltammetric responses for an uncomplicated one-electron system characterized by a = 0.5. The starting species is the oxidized one. The x-axis represents the difference of electrode potential ( ) and standard potential ( °). Figure 3 Effect of the dimensionless parameter j/ on cyclic voltammetric responses for an uncomplicated one-electron system characterized by a = 0.5. The starting species is the oxidized one. The x-axis represents the difference of electrode potential ( ) and standard potential ( °).
Currents Isw and Ipsw for nonreversible processes are rectilinear functions of n-, of the electrode surface S, the pulse amplitude zIEsw and c% as well. But, in addition to it, they are complex functions of the kinetic parameters (standard rate constants, k and charge-transfer coefficients [91]). If k decreases the peak height decreases as well. Simultaneously, the peak width is increased and the peak potential of the reduction process is shifted to more negative potentials. [Pg.95]

The toxicity of 44 metals to the biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas fluorescens was measured and expressed as minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum bactericidal concentration, and minimum biofilm eradication concentration. Linear regression analyses wa-e conducted to determine the relationships between the measured toxicity values and the following physicochemical parameters standard reduction-oxidation potential, electronegativity, the solubility product of the corresponding metal-sulfide complex, the Pearson softness index, electron density, and the covalent index. Each of the physicochemical parameters was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with one or more of the toxicity measurements. Heavy metal ions were found to show the strongest correlations between toxicity and physicochemical parameters. [Pg.168]


See other pages where Potential parameters standard is mentioned: [Pg.229]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.1410]    [Pg.1356]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.135]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.48 , Pg.49 ]




SEARCH



Potential parameters

Potential standard

Potentials, standardization

Standard parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info