Transition states potential energy surfaces

Free energy diagrams for enzymes REACTION COORDINATE DIAGRAM ENZYME ENERGETICS POTENTIAL-ENERGY SURFACES TRANSITION-STATE THEORY ARRHENIUS EQUATION VAN T HOFF RELATIONSHIP... 

A potential surface is a graphical representation of the energy of the system as a function of its geometry. For a lucid account on potential energy surfaces, transition states, methods for calculating reaction paths, etc., see Chapter 2 in ref. 7. 

The reaction systems on which the quantum chemical calculations were done and their results that are reported in this chapter are compared with existing experimental data that were obtained mainly in our laboratory. An important issue that should be mentioned at this point is the necessity to compare calculated rate parameters to those reduced in the experiment. One can calculate a very convincing potential energy surface, transition states, and intermediates on a surface and evaluate from them rate parameters. If, however, the calculated values cannot be anchored into experimental results, no one can be sure whether this particular surface is really the relevant one. 

Figure Al.6.27. Equipotential contour plots of (a) the excited- and (b), (c) ground-state potential energy surfaces. (Here a hamionic excited state is used because that is the way the first calculations were perfomied.) (a) The classical trajectory that originates from rest on the ground-state surface makes a vertical transition to the excited state, and subsequently undergoes Lissajous motion, which is shown superimposed, (b) Assuming a vertical transition down at time (position and momentum conserved) the trajectory continues to evolve on the ground-state surface and exits from chaimel 1. (c) If the transition down is at time 2 the classical trajectory exits from chaimel 2 (reprinted from [52]).

The above discussion represents a necessarily brief simnnary of the aspects of chemical reaction dynamics. The theoretical focus of tliis field is concerned with the development of accurate potential energy surfaces and the calculation of scattering dynamics on these surfaces. Experimentally, much effort has been devoted to developing complementary asymptotic techniques for product characterization and frequency- and time-resolved teclmiques to study transition-state spectroscopy and dynamics. It is instructive to see what can be accomplished with all of these capabilities. Of all the benclunark reactions mentioned in section A3.7.2. the reaction F + H2 —> HE + H represents the best example of how theory and experiment can converge to yield a fairly complete picture of the dynamics of a chemical reaction. Thus, the remainder of this chapter focuses on this reaction as a case study in reaction dynamics. 

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. 

Figure A3.7.7. Two-dimensional contour plot of the Stark-Wemer potential energy surface for the F + H2 reaction near the transition state. 0 is the F-H-H bend angle.

In the statistical description of ununolecular kinetics, known as Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory [4,7,8], it is assumed that complete IVR occurs on a timescale much shorter than that for the unimolecular reaction [9]. Furdiemiore, to identify states of the system as those for the reactant, a dividing surface [10], called a transition state, is placed at the potential energy barrier region of the potential energy surface. The assumption implicit m RRKM theory is described in the next section. 

Variational RRKM calculations, as described above, show that a imimolecular dissociation reaction may have two variational transition states [32, 31, 34, 31 and 36], i.e. one that is a tight vibrator type and another that is a loose rotator type. Wliether a particular reaction has both of these variational transition states, at a particular energy, depends on the properties of the reaction s potential energy surface [33, 34 and 31]- For many dissociation reactions there is only one variational transition state, which smoothly changes from a loose rotator type to a tight vibrator type as the energy is increased [26],... 

State I ) m the electronic ground state. In principle, other possibilities may also be conceived for the preparation step, as discussed in section A3.13.1, section A3.13.2 and section A3.13.3. In order to detemiine superposition coefficients within a realistic experimental set-up using irradiation, the following questions need to be answered (1) Wliat are the eigenstates (2) What are the electric dipole transition matrix elements (3) What is the orientation of the molecule with respect to the laboratory fixed (Imearly or circularly) polarized electric field vector of the radiation The first question requires knowledge of the potential energy surface, or... 

Hammes-Schiffer S and Tully J C 1995 Nonadiabatic transition state theory and multiple potential energy surfaces molecular dynamics of infrequent events J. Chem. Phys. 103 8528... 

Here the transition state is approximated by the lowest crossing pomt on the seam intersecting the diabatic (non-interacting) potential energy surfaces of the reactant and product. The method was originally developed... 

Characterize a potential energy surface for acertain niimberof atoms, i.e., detect all the local energy minima, the global minimum on the surface, and all the transition states between different minima. 

Variational transition state theory (VTST) is formulated around a variational theorem, which allows the optimization of a hypersurface (points on the potential energy surface) that is the elfective point of no return for reactions. This hypersurface is not necessarily through the saddle point. Assuming that molecules react without a reverse reaction once they have passed this surface... 

Rather than using transition state theory or trajectory calculations, it is possible to use a statistical description of reactions to compute the rate constant. There are a number of techniques that can be considered variants of the statistical adiabatic channel model (SACM). This is, in essence, the examination of many possible reaction paths, none of which would necessarily be seen in a trajectory calculation. By examining paths that are easier to determine than the trajectory path and giving them statistical weights, the whole potential energy surface is accounted for and the rate constant can be computed. 

Transition state search algorithms rather climb up the potential energy surface, unlike geometry optimization routines where an energy minimum is searched for. The characterization of even a simple reaction potential surface may result in location of more than one transition structure, and is likely to require many more individual calculations than are necessary to obtain equilibrium geometries for either reactant or product. 

HyperChem can calculate transition structures with either semi-empirical quantum mechanics methods or the ab initio quantum mechanics method. A transition state search finds the maximum energy along a reaction coordinate on a potential energy surface. It locates the first-order saddle point that is, the structure with only one imaginary frequency, having one negative eigenvalue. 

---