Potential charge separation

Electrically, the electrical double layer may be viewed as a capacitor with the charges separated by a distance of the order of molecular dimensions. The measured capacitance ranges from about two to several hundred microfarads per square centimeter depending on the stmcture of the double layer, the potential, and the composition of the electrode materials. Figure 4 illustrates the behavior of the capacitance and potential for a mercury electrode where the double layer capacitance is about 16 p.F/cm when cations occupy the OHP and about 38 p.F/cm when anions occupy the IHP. The behavior of other electrode materials is judged to be similar. 

Even in the absence of Faradaic current, ie, in the case of an ideally polarizable electrode, changing the potential of the electrode causes a transient current to flow, charging the double layer. The metal may have an excess charge near its surface to balance the charge of the specifically adsorbed ions. These two planes of charge separated by a small distance are analogous to a capacitor. Thus the electrode is analogous to a double-layer capacitance in parallel with a kinetic resistance. 

The induction (polarization) forces arise from the effeet of a moment in a polar molecule inducing a charge separation in an adjaeent molecule. The average potential energy funetions are... 

Calculate activation energies for Sn2 reactions of ammonia and trimethylamine with methyl iodide via transition states ammonia+methyl iodide and trimethyl-amine+methyl iodide, respectively. Is attack by ammonia or trimethylamine more facile Rationalize your observation by comparing electrostatic potential maps for the two transition states. Which transition state requires more charge separation Is this also the higher-energy transition state ... 

This review article attempts to summarize and discuss recent developments in the studies of photoinduced electron transfer in functionalized polyelectrolyte systems. The rates of photoinduced forward and thermal back electron transfers are dramatically changed when photoactive chromophores are incorporated into polyelectrolytes by covalent bonding. The origins of such changes are discussed in terms of the interfacial electrostatic potential on the molecular surface of the polyelectrolyte as well as the microphase structure formed by amphiphilic polyelectrolytes. The promise of tailored amphiphilic polyelectrolytes for designing efficient photoinduced charge separation systems is afso discussed. 

Meisel etal. [18-20] were the first to investigate how the addition of a polyelectrolyte affects photoinduced ET reactions. They found that charge separation was enhanced as a result of the retardation of the back ET when poly(vinyl sulfate) was added to an aqueous reaction system consisting of tris(2,2 -bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride (cationic photoactive chromophore) and neutral electron acceptors [21]. More recently, Sassoon and Rabani [22] observed that the addition of polybrene (a polycation) had a significant effect on separating the photoinduced ET products in an aqueous solution containing cir-dicyano-bis(2,2 -bipyridine)ruthenium(II) (photoactive donor) and potassium hexacyano-ferrate(III) (acceptor). These findings are ascribable to the electrostatic potential of the added polyelectrolytes. 

Although the electrostatic potential on the surface of the polyelectrolyte effectively prevents the diffusional back electron transfer, it is unable to retard the very fast charge recombination of a geminate ion pair formed in the primary process within the photochemical cage. Compartmentalization of a photoactive chromophore in the microphase structure of the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte provides a separated donor-acceptor system, in which the charge recombination is effectively suppressed. Thus, with a compartmentalized system, it is possible to achieve efficient charge separation. 

According to Fig. 2, as M comes in contact with S,3 4 the electron distribution at the metal surface (giving the surface potential XM) will be perturbed X ) The same is the case for the surface orientation of solvent molecules (Xs + SXS). In addition, a potential drop has to be taken into account at the free surface of the liquid layer toward the air (xs). On the whole, the variation of the electron work function (if no charge separation takes place as assumed at the pzc of a polarizable electrode) will measure the extent of perturbation at the surfaces of the two phases, i.e.,... 

As in aqueous electrochemistry it appears that application of a potential between the two terminal (Au) electrodes leads to charge separation on the Pt film so that half of it is charged positively and half negatively8 thus establishing two individual galvanic cells. The Pt film becomes a bipolar electrode and half of it is polarized anodically while the other half is polarized cathodically. The fact that p is smaller (roughly half) than that obtained upon anodic polarization in a classical electrochemical promotion experiment can be then easily explained. 

An electric potential drop across the boundary between two dissimiliar phases as well as at their surfaces exposed to a neutral gas phase is the most characteristic feature of every interface and surface electrified due to ion separation and dipole orientation. This charge separation is usually described as an ionic double layer. 

An ion-selective electrode contains a semipermeable membrane in contact with a reference solution on one side and a sample solution on the other side. The membrane will be permeable to either cations or anions and the transport of counter ions will be restricted by the membrane, and thus a separation of charge occurs at the interface. This is the Donnan potential (Fig. 5 a) and contains the analytically useful information. A concentration gradient will promote diffusion of ions within the membrane. If the ionic mobilities vary greatly, a charge separation occurs (Fig. 5 b) giving rise to what is called a diffusion potential. 

The presence of an electrical potential drop, i.e., interfacial potential, across the boundary between two dissimilar phases, as well as at their surfaces exposed to a neutral gas phase, is the most characteristic feature of every interface and surface electrified due to the ion separation and dipole orientation. This charge separation is usually described as the formation of the ionic and dipolar double layers. The main interfacial potential is the Galvani potential (termed also by Trasatti the operative potential), which is the difference of inner potentials (p and of both phases. It is a function only of the chemical... 

---