Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential across Nafion membrane

Earlier, Gavach et al. studied the superselectivity of Nafion 125 sulfonate membranes in contact with aqueous NaCl solutions using the methods of zero-current membrane potential, electrolyte desorption kinetics into pure water, co-ion and counterion selfdiffusion fluxes, co-ion fluxes under a constant current, and membrane electrical conductance. Superselectivity refers to a condition where anion transport is very small relative to cation transport. The exclusion of the anions in these systems is much greater than that as predicted by simple Donnan equilibrium theory that involves the equality of chemical potentials of cations and anions across the membrane—electrolyte interface as well as the principle of electroneutrality. The results showed the importance of membrane swelling there is a loss of superselectivity, in that there is a decrease in the counterion/co-ion mobility, with greater swelling. [Pg.329]

Figure 6. Schematic potential seen by a hydroxyl ion as it moves across a Nafion perfluorinated membrane in a chlor-alkali cell. This potential consists of two parts a constant sloping portion that arises from the voltage drop across the membrane and an oscillating part that arises from electrostatic restriction of the hydroxyl ions. Physically, the hills and troughs correspond to the channel and cluster regions, respectively. For simplicity, a one-dimensional, periodic, model potential is used to evaluate the membrane current efficiency although the real potential is three-dimensional and aperiodic. Figure 6. Schematic potential seen by a hydroxyl ion as it moves across a Nafion perfluorinated membrane in a chlor-alkali cell. This potential consists of two parts a constant sloping portion that arises from the voltage drop across the membrane and an oscillating part that arises from electrostatic restriction of the hydroxyl ions. Physically, the hills and troughs correspond to the channel and cluster regions, respectively. For simplicity, a one-dimensional, periodic, model potential is used to evaluate the membrane current efficiency although the real potential is three-dimensional and aperiodic.
The work of Adachi et al. (2009) represented a first attempt to correlate and validate ex situ and in situ water permeation phenomena in PEMs. Water permeabilities of Nafion PEMs and water transport in operating PEFCs were investigated under comparable ex situ and in situ values of temperature and RH. The examined parameters included the type of driving forces (RH, pressure), the phases of water at PEM interfaces, PEM thickness, and the effect of catalyst layers at the membrane interfaces. Several experimental setups and schemes were designed and explored. Water permeability at 70°C was determined for Nafion membranes exposed to either liquid or vapor phases of water. Chemical potential gradients of water across the membrane are controlled through the use of differences in RH (38-100%), in the case of contact with water vapor, and hydraulic pressure (0-1.2 atm), in the case of contact with liquid water. Three types of water permeation experiments were performed, labeled as vapor-vapor permeation (VVP), liquid-vapor permeation (LVP), and liquid-liquid permeation (LLP). Ex situ measurements revealed that the flux of water is largest... [Pg.370]

Fig. 7 Schematic of proton transport in and through Nafion membranes. Protons are generated by hydrogen oxidation on a catalyst surface. The protons move laterally in the catalyst layer (uniform potential field) until they find an opening into the hydrophilic domains of the Nafion. The protons are transported across the membrane by electric field-assisted motion. At low applied potentials, the transport across the membrane is limiting, but at high applied potentials, the proton motion is limited by diffusion in the catalyst layer to the openings of the hydrophilic domains... Fig. 7 Schematic of proton transport in and through Nafion membranes. Protons are generated by hydrogen oxidation on a catalyst surface. The protons move laterally in the catalyst layer (uniform potential field) until they find an opening into the hydrophilic domains of the Nafion. The protons are transported across the membrane by electric field-assisted motion. At low applied potentials, the transport across the membrane is limiting, but at high applied potentials, the proton motion is limited by diffusion in the catalyst layer to the openings of the hydrophilic domains...
Silver(II) species can be generated electrochemically in a simple cell employing a platinum anode and a stainless steel cathode. The anode compartment contains 8 molar nitric acid and 0.5 molar silver(I) nitrate. The cathode compartment, which contains 4 molar nitric acid, is separated from the anode compartment by a Nafion membrane. Application of a 2 volt potential across the cell causes the formation of a yellow coloration in the anode compartment which is attributable to the formation of silver(II). [Pg.113]

There are several advantages for the use of S-ZrOj as a catalyst support in PEMFC applications. Because of its hydrophilicity, it has been suggested that this type of fuel cell catalyst would be well suited for low-relative humidity conditions and possibly simplify fuel cell components to operate without the use of a humidifier. Due to the proton conductivity across the surface of the material, less Nafion iono-mer needs to be cast to form the TPBs. Platinum utilization increases as the S-ZrOj support acts as both the platinum and proton conductor and better gas diffusion to the catalyst site results from the decreased blockage of Nafion ionomer (Liu et al., 2006a,b). It is beheved that within porous carbon catalyst supports, platinum deposited within the pores may not have proton conductivity due to the perfluorosul-fonated ionomer unahle to penetrate into the pores. Thus, a TPB which is necessary for a catalyst active site will not be formed. Therefore, the S-ZrOj support has an additional benefit over porous carbon material supports in that by using the S-ZrOj as a support for platinum catalysts, the surface of the support can act as a proton conductor and platinum deposited anywhere on the surface of the support will provide immediate access to the electron and proton pathways thereby requiring less Nafion. Thus the use of S-ZrOj in fuel cell MEA components may potentially lower the cost of materials substantially, as the catalytic metals and membrane materials are among the most costly in a PEMFC. However, like most metallic oxides, the downside of their use stems from their relatively low electron conductivity and low surface areas that results in poor platinum dispersion. [Pg.63]


See other pages where Potential across Nafion membrane is mentioned: [Pg.594]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.16]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.298 ]




SEARCH



Membrane potential

Nafion membrane

Potential across

© 2024 chempedia.info