Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Portland cement chemical analysis

In many clinkers, the ferrite phase is closely mixed with aluminate due to a similarity in cell parameters, oriented intergrowth can occur (MIS). The close admixture often renders X-ray microanalysis difficult or unreliable. For ordinary Portland cement clinkers, the compositions found in dilferent laboratories are nevertheless remarkably consistent. Table 1.2 includes an average value based on the results of investigations using X-ray microanalysis (H8,K1,B2,U1,H3,B4) or chemical analysis of separated material (Yl). Table 1.3 includes suggested site occupancies corresponding to these data. [Pg.30]

Table 4.3 Distribution of oxide components among phases in a typical Portland cement clinker, calculated from the bulk chemical analysis... [Pg.117]

As shown in Table 2.7, the coefficient of chemical resistance of RubCon is 1.0 for water, 0.81-0.95 for all mineral acids (exception is KCI = 0.69 for 36% solution of hydrochloric acid), 0.82-0.95 for organic acids, 0.82-0.91 for alkalis, 0.88 for solvents and petroleum products, and 0.84-0.86 for solution of salts. The analysis of experimental data has shown that RubCon offers universal chemical resistance many times higher than ordinary Portland cement concrete and surpasses the chemical resistance of polyester, polyepoxy, and vinyl ester polymer concrete. It is worth noting that penetration depths of 5% nitric and 36% solution of hydrochloric acids into RubCon sample bodies were 3, 4, and 5.1 mm, respectively the penetration ability of these acids is higher as compared with other corrosive environments. [Pg.79]

Table 2.1 shows the ionic concentrations measured by different researchers in the pore solution of cement pastes, mortars and concretes, obtained both with Portland cements (OPC) and blended cements [4-14]. Measurements were carried out by chemical analysis of the liquid extracted under pressure, using specific pore-extraction devices. [Pg.23]

J. Song, E. Mante, W. Romaow, S. Kim, Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA and gray MTA-Angelns, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 102 (2006) 809-815. [Pg.194]

A chemical analysis alone cannot describe the form, particle size, or mineralogy of the feed. SiO from a chemical analysis does not necessarily mean quartz, nor does Fe Oj necessarily imply hematite. Analysis by X-ray diffraction (XRD) quite accurately records most of the detectable mineralogical varieties and with calibrated standards allows an estimation of abundance. But XRD cannot elucidate the particle form or size, and virtually misses the occurrence of amorphous materials such as glass or poorly crystalline materials such as limonite, FeO(OH), a major constituent in many iron sources for portland cement. Phases below the detection limit by XRD can easily be seen in the microscope. However, chemical and XRD analyses of each of the raw materials individually, in sieved fractions, and in their blended combination in the feed, are immensely helpful, indeed strongly recommended, for routine... [Pg.142]

In 1995, Dr. Campbell established Campbell Petrographic Services, Inc., in Dodgeville, Wisconsin, where he continues to emphasize thin-section microscopy, fortified by X-ray diffraction, chemical analysis, and physical testing. He has written numerous articles on cement and concrete microscopy, as well as both editions of Microscopical Examination and Interpretation of Portland Cement and Clinker. He teaches classes on cement and clinker microscopy at the Portland Cement Association, in addition to having taught in Mexico, Australia, France, and the Philippines. He is active in ASTM, the International Cement Microscopy Association (ICMA), and the Society of Sedimentary Geology. [Pg.202]

Uses Alkali mfg. of lime neutralizer paper opacifier putty tooth powds. whitewash Portland cement filler, extender in paints, rubber, plastics, caulks, cements, ceramics, coatings insecticides in chemical analysis precipitant in waste treatment filler pigment coagulant, flocculant in potable water treatment foods (nutrient, dough conditioner, yeast food, colorant, alkali, calcium fortification, buffer, anticaking agent, stabilizer) pharmaceuticals (alkali, neutralizer, colorant, opacifier, tablet/capsule diluent, antacid, antidiarrheal medicine food-contact applies. [Pg.672]

Example of the calculation of the potential phase composition. Considers normal Portland cement clinker with the following chemical analysis (% by weight) ... [Pg.77]

The cement used in this study was commercially available ordinary Portland cement (PC) Type I confirming to the ASTM C150 standard (2012). The FA used was sourced from the Colie Power Station of Western Australia and was classified as class F FA in accordance with ASTM C618 (2012). Commercially available dry nano-CaCOs (NC) powder with a size of approximately 40—50 nm and 97.8% calcite (CaCOs) content was used (see Figure 11.1). The NC was bought from Reade Advanced Materials (United States). Figure 11.2 shows the XRD analysis of PC, FA, and NC. The chemical composition and physical properties of cement, class F FA, and NC are presented in Table 11.1. [Pg.277]

The performance of many non-portland cement-based repair materials is dependent on the chemistry and physics of the system, the properties of the existing concrete, and the enviromnent. Thermal analysis techniques are increasingly being used to investigate the physico-chemical behavior of non-portland cement binders exposed to aggressive enviromnents. [Pg.355]

The relatively low calcination temperatures produce very reactive free lime which has been observed to convert rapidly to calcium hydroxide during laboratory processing and storage of the cements. Indeed, a comparison of lime found in calcium hydroxide (by XRD) and free lime (by chemical analysis) suggests that the maximum free CaO may be around 4 % rather than the 12 % shown. Even 4 % is considered a high value when considering portland cements but samples did not show signs of distress upon water immersion unlike others produced in this laboratory. [Pg.87]

Method.—As a method to be followed for the analysis of cement, that proposed by the Committee on Uniformity in the Analysis of Materials for the Portland Cement Industry, of the New York Section of the Society for Chemical Industry, and published in the Journal of the Society for January 15, 1902, is recommended. [Pg.119]


See other pages where Portland cement chemical analysis is mentioned: [Pg.319]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.1017]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.2007]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.277]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.100 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 ]




SEARCH



Cement analysis

Cement-chemical

© 2024 chempedia.info