Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Film thickness determination polymer

Usually, nanoparticles in polymeric systems, are supposed to increase the barrier properties of such materials. One of the most important effects of clays on the polymer matrix properties is the dramatic improvement of the barrier properties of polymers, since clay sheets are namrally impermeable. The extent of the improvement in the barrier properties depends on the degree of tortuosity created by the nanoparticles layers, and the manner by which diffusion of molecules through the polymer film occurs. The ratio of the actual distance to molecule diffusion to the shortest distance to diffusion (polymer film thickness) determines the tortuous factor. This is done by creating a maze or tortuous path that will ordinarily slow down or retard the progress of gas molecules through the polymeric matrix. [Pg.240]

In the next step, polymer films (thickness 200 nm) of PS-COOH or FPS-COOH were spin coated on the top of the GPS layer from 2% toluene solutions. After casting, the films were annealed in a vacuum oven at 150 °C for 15 h. Non-grafted polymer was removed by Soxhlet extraction in toluene for 6 h. The thickness of PS and FPS grafted layers was determined using null ellipsometiy. [Pg.74]

PAP cycle at room temperature the inset shows the same experiment for a DRl/PMMA guest host system. Details of ATR EO modulation experiments can be found elsewhere.Briefly, the EO coefficients of polymer films are determined by applying an ac voltage (ViCosQt) between two metallic layers that sandwich the polymer film, and by recording the modulation of the reflectivity at Q, for the Pockels effect, and at 2Q, for the Kerr effect. A computer program evaluates the amplitudes of modulation of the film s thickness, and the refractive indices, , (i = x, y, 2 which represent the principal axes of the film), from which the Pockels, e.g., and Kerr, e.g., s y, EG coefficients are obtained. These are given by... [Pg.274]

Matheson Gas Products) was used as the carrier gas. Substrates were prepared by vapor deposition of an opaque layer of aluminum on glass microscope slides. Polymer film thicknesses were determined by measuring the step height between a masked and unmasked portion of the specimen with a Rank, Taylor, and Hobson Talystep 1 traversing stylus. Deposited films were stored in a vacuum dessicator prior to measurement of the infrared spectra in order to minimize the absorption of moisture from the atmosphere. [Pg.129]

A comparison of the degree of crystallinity obtained by gas chromatography for poly(ethylene oxide) of molecular weight 40 000 with those determined by IE spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction yields [183] 74% for the first method when the polymer film thickness was 6.5 X10" cm, 75.9% for the second (film thickness 5.1X10 cm) and 79.1% for the last method. The differences were ascribed to the incomplete development of crystallinity in the films used in gas chromatography and IE s ctroscopy, these films being thinner than the diameter of the spherulites. [Pg.160]

The effect of polymer film thickness on predicted by this model, is generally confirmed by experiment [161,172, 220] (Fig. 5.15 b). However the determination of F by extrapolation of retention data to infinite film thickness is not applicable to all polymers for polystyrene at 128"0, for example, whereas I oo, F 0 [161]. For all percentages of the stationary phase and particularly for lower percentages, this temperature is in the non-equilibrium range so that extrapolation is not expected to give correct results (when I oo, hJF - 0 and F, is closer to FJ than to Ff). Extrapolation is valid only for temperatures much abov e T, and for a low percentage of stationary phase the kinetic effects on retention volumes are then either absent or may be taken into account through suitable corrections. [Pg.186]

Smith [113] studied the adsorption of n-pentane on mercury, determining both the surface tension change and the ellipsometric film thickness as a function of the equilibrium pentane pressure. F could then be calculated from the Gibbs equation in the form of Eq. ni-106, and from t. The agreement was excellent. Ellipsometry has also been used to determine the surface compositions of solutions [114,115], as well polymer adsorption at the solution-air interface [116]. [Pg.78]

Friedrich et al. also used XPS to investigate the mechanisms responsible for adhesion between evaporated metal films and polymer substrates [28]. They suggested that the products formed at the metal/polymer interface were determined by redox reactions occurring between the metal and polymer. In particular, it was shown that carbonyl groups in polymers could react with chromium. Thus, a layer of chromium that was 0.4 nm in thickness decreased the carbonyl content on the surface of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) by about 8% but decreased the carbonyl content on the surface of polycarbonate (PC) by 77%. The C(ls) and 0(ls) spectra of PC before and after evaporation of chromium onto the surface are shown in Fig. 22. Before evaporation of chromium, the C(ls) spectra consisted of two components near 284.6 eV that were assigned to carbon atoms in the benzene rings and in the methyl groups. Two additional... [Pg.273]

Platinum was added to Nation before Incorporating CdS In order to avoid the reduction of CdS during the platlnlzatlon process. Nation (DuPont 117, 0.018 cm thick) films were soaked In Pt(NH2)2l2 (0.1 mM) solution for 4 hr. The amount of the Pt complex Incorporated was determined by measuring the optical absorption change In the liquid phase. The films were subsequently reduced with NaBH (0.1 M) solution for one day to produce Pt metal dispersed throughout the polymer film. The amount of Pt was found to be about 0.02 mg cm 2. [Pg.567]

The ink-jet process relies on using a piezoelectric printhead that can create deformation on a closed cavity through the application of an electric field. This causes the fluid in the cavity to be ejected through the nozzle whose volume is determined by the applied voltage, nozzle diameter, and ink viscosity. The final width of the drop of the substrate is a result of the volume of fluid expelled and the thickness of the droplet on the surface. In addition, the drop placement is critical to the ultimate resolution of the display. Typical volumes expelled from a printhead are 10 to 40 pi, resulting in a subpixel width between 65 and 100 pm. Drop accuracies of +15 pm have been reported such that resolutions better than 130 ppi are achievable however, because the solvent to polymer ratio is so high, the drops must be contained during the evaporation process to obtain the desired resolution and film thickness. This containment can be a patterned photoresist layer that has been chemically modified so that the EL polymer ink does not stick to it. [Pg.574]

Encouraged by the X-ray and contact angle results, we performed some preliminary gas-permeation measurements. Here, a self-supporting film is required and only the longer block copolymers were used. Fluoro-PSB-II and Fluoro-triblock were coated on porous Celgard 2400 membranes the measurements were taken at room temperature at a driving pressure of 5 bars. Since no absolute polymer layer thickness has been determined, only relative values of the permeability are given (Table 10.6). In the case of the separation of C02 from... [Pg.163]

The wavelength range for which each polymer undergoes photodimerization, the wavelength at which each polymer displays maximal sensitivity, and the sensitivity (E the minimum incident input energy per unit area required to produce an insolubilized film of the same thickness as the the initial film) are listed in Table I. Polymer sensitivities were determined for the wavelength where each polymer displays maximum sensitivity. All formulations employed the same spinning solvent and the same developer. [Pg.311]

To prepare ultrathin polymer films on the surface of wafers, especially those of large diameter (6 or 8 inch), uniformity and defect density become important factors in determining the resist quality. The conventional spin coating method has been reported to introduce interference striations (11) and high defect densities (2.31 when used to prepare ultrathin polymer films. As an alternative approach, the LB technique has been proposed as being suited to the preparation of more uniform ultrathin polymer films (2). Using this technique monolayer polymer films can be transferred layer by layer to the surface of a solid substrate from the water surface. An important feature of the LB technique is that the accumulation of monolayer films allows the thickness of the built-up film to be controlled in a precise manner. Consequently, extremely uniform and ultrathin polymer films can be prepared. [Pg.350]

The interferometry trace shows the change in the optical thickness of the polymer film with respect to time. Both the completion of the polymer film dissolution and the DR can be determined. [Pg.387]


See other pages where Film thickness determination polymer is mentioned: [Pg.233]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.1735]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



Film determination

Film thickness determination

Polymers determination

Thick films

© 2024 chempedia.info