Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polishing design limitations

By delivering slurry directly to the pad-wafer interface, process engineers have a great deal of latitude in controlling slurry distribution across the wafer during polish. In other words, they can design processes that do not suffer the limitations of pH or oxidizer concentration gradients across the wafer. Oxide and metal CMP processes are very different, so it is useful not only to be able to inject slurry directly to the wafer surface, but also to control where on the wafer the slurry is delivered. [Pg.25]

The design-base particle diameter to be separated in the vapor space should not exceed the pad-disengage-mt-nt droplet diameter. 1). To be on the safe side, a maximum droplet diameter should be limited to 400 pm. In horizontal drum design, the mesh pad should be regarded as a polisher for removing small droplets not separated in the vapor space—i.e., as a secondary mechanism in vapor-liquid separation... [Pg.109]

Although most of the principles of antibody capture in packed bed mode are applicable to fluidized-bed technology, today applications are hindered by the very limited availability of sorbents specifically designed for fluidized beds. For instance, the potential applicability of a protein A affinity capture in a fluid bed seems very attractive and may become a useful operation with appropriate dense solid phases. Collected fractions rich in antibody obtained at the issue of a capture step in fluidized-bed mode can be further repurified or polished by other types of packed-bed chromatography, as described in Section V.I. [Pg.559]

The chemical component of CMP slurry creates porous unstable oxides or soluble surface complexes. The slurries are designed to have additives that initiate the above reactions. The mechanical component of the process removes the above-formed films by abrasion. In most planarization systems the mechanical component is the rate-limiting step. As soon as the formed porous film is removed, a new one is formed and planarization proceeds. Therefore, the removal rate is directly proportional to the applied pressure. To achieve practical copper removal rates, pressures greater than 3 psi are often required. These pressures should not create delamination, material deformation, or cracking on dense or relatively dense dielectrics used in silicon microfabrication on conventional dielectrics. However, the introduction of porous ultra-low-fc (low dielectric constant) materials will require a low downpressure (< 1 psi) polishing to maintain the structural integrity of the device [7-9]. It is expected that dielectrics with k value less than 2.4 will require a planarization process of 1 psi downpressure or less when they are introduced to production. It is expected that this process requirement will become even more important for the 45-nm technology node [10]. [Pg.320]

The main difficulties in preparation of the Polish NAP were caused by the fact that the EU ETS and NAP guidance were designed to support fulfilment of the common Kyoto limit of EU15, an unsuitable situation for new accession countries. These countries have a different economic situation and are below the Kyoto limit due to significant emission reduction in the past. From the new Member States perspective some elements of the EU ETS seem to be not quite fair or too risky, particularly with respect to such issues as ... [Pg.333]

CF tests may be carried out in an apparatus designed by the Continental Oil Company. The apparatus consists of a Monel tank with four samples subjected to cyclic bending. The first step consists of determining the displacement caused by the applied load. The exact stresses are determined by strain gauges. The electrolyte is deaerated with 3% sodium chloride. Polished or sand blasted samples are used, and the behavior of the alloy in CF may be studied at the free corrosion potential under different percentages of stress amplitude of the elastic limit. From potentiokinetic curves, I =J E) the protection or pitting potential applied during the stress test. Each test can have four samples and the difference between results (85) for similar tests does not exceed 15%. [Pg.69]


See other pages where Polishing design limitations is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.1948]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.2439]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1043]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.1131]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.1948]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.531]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.220 ]




SEARCH



Polish/polishers

Polisher

Polishes

© 2024 chempedia.info