Poisoning Effects of Individual Elements

Here we shall briefly summarize the effects of individual poisons on various catalytic reactions taking place on automotive catalysts. There are three main catalytic processes oxidation of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and reduction of nitric oxide. Among secondary reactions there are undesirable ones which may produce small amounts of unregulated emissions, such as NH3, S03 (6), HCN (76, 77), or H2S under certain operating conditions. Among other secondary processes which are important for overall performance, in particular of three-way catalysts, there are water-gas shift, hydrocarbon-steam reforming, and oxygen transfer reactions. Specific information on the effect of poisons on these secondary processes is scarce. 

Recent evaluations of S02 oxidation over noble metal catalysts (Pt, Pd, and Rh) have given some information on one particular secondary reaction. It was observed in car tests that S03 formation under the conditions of automobile exhaust is highly vulnerable to catalyst deactivation either by thermal sintering or by poisoning (78, 79). At the same time, the data indicated a lesser sensitivity of CO and hydrocarbon oxidation to catalyst aging. The results were confirmed in laboratory experiments (80). This is one example of preferential suppression of an undesirable side reaction. Obviously, the importance of a given poison on the different secondary reactions will vary widely with catalyst formulation and operating conditions. 

All the surface processes on automotive catalysts which have been tested for the effects of lead poisoning are affected by the access of lead to the catalyst surface. The effect will differ, though, for different surface processes. Oxidation of hydrocarbons has been found repeatedly to be more vulnerable than oxidation of carbon monoxide to lead poisoning (10, 19, 25). The initial oxidation activity of noble metal catalysts, never exposed to poisons, is higher for CO than for hydrocarbons (54). Therefore, it is best to use the effect of lead on hydrocarbon oxidation for assessing the susceptibility of a given oxidation catalyst to this type of poisoning. 

The individual hydrocarbons in the exhaust differ widely in the ease of both catalytic and noncatalytic oxidation. Thus, the poisoning effect may vary, and indeed does, with the hydrocarbon composition of the exhaust itself, and with the necessarily limited choice of particular hydrocarbons used in various laboratory tests. In many instances the hydrocarbons are 

Although catalyst deterioration for methane oxidation was clearly demonstrated in the laboratory test under steady-state conditions at 500°C, as shown in Fig. 15, it seems to be less discernible in car tests based on various driving cycles. Thus, data obtained on Ford vehicles, subjected to the 1977 Federal Certification Test over 50,000 miles, indicated that catalysts can be essentially inactive in removing methane even at zero miles, under these conditions. 

---