Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Physical tests surface energy

The results of the EXAFS studies on supported bimetallic catalysts have provided excellent confirmation of earlier conclusions (21-24) regarding the existence of bimetallic clusters in these catalysts. Moreover, major structural features of bimetallic clusters deduced from chemisorption and catalytic data (21-24), or anticipated from considerations of the miscibility or surface energies of the components (13-15), received additional support from the EXAFS data. From another point of view, it can also be said that the bimetallic catalyst systems provided a critical test of the EXAFS method for investigations of catalyst structure (17). The application of EXAFS in conjunction with studies employing ( mical probes and other types of physical probes was an important feature of the work (25). [Pg.265]

Physical-property tests are used to measure the properties of adhesives in the liquid or gelled states prior to curing and in the solid state after curing. Tests for the uncured state such as viscosity, visual examination, and surface energy or contact angle assure that fillers, if used, have not settled out, that the material has not exceeded its pot life or shelf life, and that the supplier has not changed the formulation. Visual examination and density after cure are performed to verify that voids are not present or, if present, meet specification requirements. Finally, light transmission and index of refraction measurements are important for adhesives used in optoelectronic applications. [Pg.346]

In this way, a low-surface-energy, chemically inert lubricant forms a physically smooth and chemically homogeneous lubricating film on the structured surface, which leads to low contact angle hysteresis and a strongly reduced adhesion of the test liquids (e.g., water) to be repelled. The schematic diagram presented in Figure 11 illustrates the physical action principle of slippery liquid infused structured surfaces in comparison to superhydrophobic surfaces based on composite solid-air interfaces. [Pg.106]

Here, the 02 acts as a volumetric component, accounting for the geometric change that occurs as the indenter makes contact with the test material surface. Therefore, it is reasonably well-established that the 02 denotes the resistance to crack-free plastic deformation and can be used to estimate the load-independent hardness when no ISE is present (when ai = 0) and based on the indenter profde. Conversely, die at term acts as a surface component and is believed to have some relation with surface energy, however the physical significance of this remains unknown. [Pg.92]

The following several sections deal with various theories or models for adsorption. It turns out that not only is the adsorption isotherm the most convenient form in which to obtain and plot experimental data, but it is also the form in which theoretical treatments are most easily developed. One of the first demands of a theory for adsorption then, is that it give an experimentally correct adsorption isotherm. Later, it is shown that this test is insufficient and that a more sensitive test of the various models requires a consideration of how the energy and entropy of adsorption vary with the amount adsorbed. Nowadays, a further expectation is that the model not violate the molecular picture revealed by surface diffraction, microscopy, and spectroscopy data, see Chapter VIII and Section XVIII-2 Steele [8] discusses this picture with particular reference to physical adsorption. [Pg.603]

ACN vapor had the most pronounced permutation of the relatively rapid and relatively slow response and recovery kinetics. Such behavior could be due to the combination of physical and chemical adsorption. Physical adsorption effects are typically pronounced with rapid response and recovery kinetics because of the relatively low energies of physical interactions between vapors and the sensing surface. Chemical adsorption effects have much slower recovery kinetics because of the relatively high energies of chemical interactions between vapors and the sensing surface. The recovery from all tested vapors was reversible with the slowest recovery after the exposure to ACN on the order of several hours from the highest tested vapor concentration of 0.1 P/Po-... [Pg.87]

An early success of quantum mechanics was the explanation by Wilson (1931a, b) of the reason for the sharp distinction between metals and non-metals. In crystalline materials the energies of the electron states lie in bands a non-metal is a material in which all bands are full or empty, while in a metal one or more bands are only partly full. This distinction has stood the test of time the Fermi energy of a metal, separating occupied from unoccupied states, and the Fermi surface separating them in k-space are not only features of a simple model in which electrons do not interact with one another, but have proved to be physical quantities that can be measured. Any metal-insulator transition in a crystalline material, at any rate at zero temperature, must be a transition from a situation in which bands overlap to a situation when they do not Band-crossing metal-insulator transitions, such as that of barium under pressure, are described in this book. [Pg.1]

Rigorous potential energy surfaces should be the basis of a unified view of chemical reactivity. However they can only be computed for the simplest systems. The approximations required to explain more complex systems both lead to poor reproductions of the observables and add little to their physical and chemical understanding. More insight can be given by simpler theories of broad application. Such theories become most useful when they are easy to apply, are consistent with their physical meaning, have predictive value, and can be tested experimentally. The model of reality thus obtained, may be read by both organic and physical chemists. [Pg.68]


See other pages where Physical tests surface energy is mentioned: [Pg.391]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.8]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.353 ]




SEARCH



Physical testing

Physical tests

Surface physics

© 2024 chempedia.info