Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pharmacokinetic studies concentrations

Alcohol can affect the metabolism of trichloroethylene. This is noted in both toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies. In toxicity studies, simultaneous exposure to ethanol and trichloroethylene increased the concentration of trichloroethylene in the blood and breath of male volunteers (Stewart et al. 1974c). These people also showed "degreaser s flush"—a transient vasodilation of superficial skin vessels. In rats, depressant effects in the central nervous system are exacerbated by coadministration of ethanol and trichloroethylene (Utesch et al. 1981). [Pg.171]

CYP3A4 and 2D6 are the major enzymes involved in the metabolism of galantamine. Pharmacokinetic studies with inhibitors of this system have resulted in increased galantamine concentrations or reductions in clearance. Similarly to donepezil, if inhibitors are given concurrently with galantamine, monitoring for increased cholinergic side effects should be done. Studies with inducers of these enzymes have not been completed.37... [Pg.520]

Lenalidomide was approved recently for the indication of myelodysplastic syndrome where the 5q deletion is present. Since lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide, all the same precautions must be taken to prevent phocomelia. The time to maximum lenalidomide concentrations occurs 0.5 to 4 hours after the dose. The terminal half-life ranges from 3 to 9 hours. Approximately 65% of lenalidomide is eliminated unchanged in the urine, with clearance exceeding the glomerular filtration rate. To date, no pharmacokinetic studies have been done in patients with renal dysfunction. Lenalidomide is used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma. Other side effects are neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolus. [Pg.1293]

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion. There are no data available on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of diisopropyl methylphosphonate in humans. Limited animal data suggest that diisopropyl methylphosphonate is absorbed following oral and dermal exposure. Fat tissues do not appear to concentrate diisopropyl methylphosphonate or its metabolites to any significant extent. Nearly complete metabolism of diisopropyl methylphosphonate can be inferred based on the identification and quantification of its urinary metabolites however, at high doses the metabolism of diisopropyl methylphosphonate appears to be saturated. Animal studies have indicated that the urine is the principal excretory route for removal of diisopropyl methylphosphonate after oral and dermal administration. Because in most of the animal toxicity studies administration of diisopropyl methylphosphonate is in food, a pharmacokinetic study with the compound in food would be especially useful. It could help determine if the metabolism of diisopropyl methylphosphonate becomes saturated when given in the diet and if the levels of saturation are similar to those that result in significant adverse effects. [Pg.108]

There are special problems in bioequivalency determinations when conventional pharmacokinetic studies are not possible. For example, when drugs are administered intranasally for direct treatment of receptors in the nasal mucosa, the concentration of drug in plasma may be below the limit of quantification. In such cases we are forced to attempt measurement of clinical response. The subjectivity and/or low precision of this type of study can be a serious problem. [Pg.757]

Kobylinska et al. [62] described a high performance liquid chromatographic analytical method for the determination of miconazole in human plasma using solid-phase extraction. The method uses a solid-phase extraction as the sample preparation step. The assay procedure is sensitive enough to measure concentrations of miconazole for 8 h in a pharmacokinetic study of Mikonazol tablets and Daktarin tablets in human volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of the two formulations was equivalent. [Pg.48]

In our laboratories, a cycle time of 90 sec can be achieved with a dilution factor of 1 25 for a given sample concentration, allowing the purity and identity control of two and a half 384-well microtiter plates per day. The online dilution eliminated an external step in the workflow and reduced the risks of decomposition of samples in the solvent mixture (weakly acidic aqueous solvent) required for analysis. Mao et al.23 described an example in which parallel sample preparation reduced steps in the workflow. They described a 2-min cycle time for the analysis of nefazodone and its metabolites for pharmacokinetic studies. The cycle time included complete solid phase extraction of neat samples, chromatographic separation, and LC/MS/MS analysis. The method was fully validated and proved rugged for high-throughput analysis of more than 5000 human plasma samples. Many papers published about this topic describe different methods of sample preparation. Hyotylainen24 has written a recent review. [Pg.111]

To relate a positive finding in an in vitro test to the in vivo situation, one must either compare the concentration that caused the positive developmental effect in vitro to the exposure level of the embryo in vivo or compare the in vitro concentration for a developmental effect to the matemotoxicity that would be associated with exposure at that concentration in vivo. To do the necessary pharmacokinetic studies in vivo would defeat the purpose of using an in vitro test. It would be very desirable and may be possible, though, to have an endpoint in an in vitro test that would correlate with maternal toxicity. [Pg.289]

By simultaneous monitoring of tidal volume and respiratory rate, or minute volume, and the concentration of an inhaled vapor in the bloodstream and the vapor in the exposure atmosphere, pharmacokinetic studies on the C t relationship have shown that the effective dose was nearly proportional to the exposure concentration for vapors such as 1,1,1-trichloroethane (Dallas et al., 1986), which has a saturable metabolism, found that the steady-state plasma concentrations were disproportion-ally greater at higher exposure concentrations. [Pg.348]

In single-dose pharmacokinetic studies of oral absorption, the primary concerns are with the extent of absorption and peak plasma or target tissue concentrations of the test substance. If the test vehicle affects gastric emptying, it may be necessary to use both fasted and nonfasted animals for pharmacokinetic studies. [Pg.724]

Analysis of Data. Data from all metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies should be analyzed with the same pharmacokinetic model and results should be expressed in the same units. Concentration units are acceptable if the organ or sample size is reported, but percent of dose/organ is usually a more meaningfiil unit. In general, all samples should be analyzed for metabolites that cumulatively represent more than 1% of the dose. [Pg.726]

As it is often very difficult to quantify therapeutic performance with pharmacodynamic and clinical studies, pharmacokinetic studies are usually the most suitable tool to describe the performance of the drug product in vivo. Once a relationship between the plasma concentration of the drug or active moiety and the therapeutic effect has been established, BA may be considered to be the perfect surrogate parameter for efficacy and/or safety of a drug product. [Pg.340]

Besides the poor specificity of many of the assays used to determine plasma drug concentrations, another problem which has arisen from these studies has been the length of the "wash-out" period necessary before the patient is given the neuroleptic under investigation. As a result of the prolonged duration of blockade of dopamine receptors in the brain by conventional neuroleptics and their metabolites, it is necessary to allow a wash-out period of several weeks before the patients are subject to a pharmacokinetic study. This raises serious ethical questions. Perhaps with the advent of new imaging techniques it may be possible in the near future actually to determine the rate of disappearance of neuroleptics from the brain of the patient. This may enable the relationship between plasma concentration and clinical response to be accurately determined. [Pg.82]

There are several approaches to pharmacokinetic modelling. These include empirical, compartmental, clearance-based and physiological models. In the latter full physiological models of blood flow to and from all major organs and tissues in the body are considered. Such models can be used to study concentration-time profiles in the individual organs and e. g. in the plasma [57-60]. Further progress in this area may result in better PK predictions in humans [61]... [Pg.139]


See other pages where Pharmacokinetic studies concentrations is mentioned: [Pg.537]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.1141]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.124]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



Pharmacokinetics Pharmacokinetic studies

© 2024 chempedia.info