Periodic table development

When Mendeleev invented the periodic table, he was well-acquainted with Dalton s atomic theory. He knew nothing, however, about subatomic particles, and especially the electron, which is the foundation for the modern periodic table s distinctive shape. Because the original periodic table developed out of experimental observations, chemists did not need an understanding of atomic structure to develop it. (As you will see in section 3.3, however, the periodic table easily accommodates details about atomic structure. In fact, you will learn that the modern periodic table s distinctive design is a natural consequence of atomic structure.)... 

The Universal Force Field, UFF, is one of the so-called whole periodic table force fields. It was developed by A. Rappe, W Goddard III, and others. It is a set of simple functional forms and parameters used to model the structure, movement, and interaction of molecules containing any combination of elements in the periodic table. The parameters are defined empirically or by combining atomic parameters based on certain rules. Force constants and geometry parameters depend on hybridization considerations rather than individual values for every combination of atoms in a bond, angle, or dihedral. The equilibrium bond lengths were derived from a combination of atomic radii. The parameters [22, 23], including metal ions [24], were published in several papers. 

For nearly half a century, Mendeleev s periodic table remained an empirical compilation of the relationship of the elements. Only after the first atomic model was developed by the physicists of the early twentieth century, which took form in Bohr s model, was it possible to reconcile the involved general concepts with the specificity of the chemical elements. Bohr indeed expanded Rutherford s model of the atom, which tried to connect the chemical specificity of the elements grouped in Mendeleev s table with the behavior of electrons spinning around the nucleus. Bohr hit upon the idea that Mendeleev s periodicity could... 

The development of the structural theory of the atom was the result of advances made by physics. In the 1920s, the physical chemist Langmuir (Nobel Prize in chemistry 1932) wrote, The problem of the structure of atoms has been attacked mainly by physicists who have given little consideration to the chemical properties which must be explained by a theory of atomic structure. The vast store of knowledge of chemical properties and relationship, such as summarized by the Periodic Table, should serve as a better foundation for a theory of atomic structure than the relativity meager experimental data along purely physical lines. ... 

This system of nomenclature has withstood the impact of later experimental discoveries and theoretical developments that have since the time of Guyton de Morveau and Lavoisier greatiy altered the character of chemical thought, eg, atomic theory (Dalton, 1802), the hydrogen theory of acids (Davy, 1809), the duahstic theory (Berzehus, 1811), polybasic acids (Liebig, 1834), Periodic Table (Mendeleev and Meyer, 1869), electrolytic dissociation theory (Arrhenius, 1887), and electronic theory and modem knowledge of molecular stmcture. 

By this time, the Periodic Table of elements was well developed, although it was considered a function of the atomic mass rather than atomic number. Before the discovery of radioactivity, it had been estabUshed that each natural element had a unique mass thus it was assumed that each element was made up of only one type of atom. Some of the radioactivities found in both the uranium and thorium decays had similar chemical properties, but because these had different half-Hves it was assumed that there were different elements. It became clear, however, that if all the different radioactivities from uranium and thorium were separate elements, there would be too many to fit into the Periodic Table. 

Sulfur [7704-34-9] S, a nonmetallic element, is the second element of Group 16 (VIA) of the Periodic Table, coming below oxygen and above selenium. In massive elemental form, sulfur is often referred to as brimstone. Sulfur is one of the most important taw materials of the chemical industry. It is of prime importance to the fertilizer industry (see Fertilizers) and its consumption is generally regarded as one of the best measures of a nation s industrial development and economic activity (see Sulfur compounds Sulfurremoval and recovery Sulfuric acid and sulfur trioxide). 

The concept of chemical periodicity is central to the study of inorganic chemistry. No other generalization rivals the periodic table of the elements in its ability to systematize and rationalize known chemical facts or to predict new ones and suggest fruitful areas for further study. Chemical periodicity and the periodic table now find their natural interpretation in the detailed electronic structure of the atom indeed, they played a major role at the turn of the century in elucidating the mysterious phenomena of radioactivity and the quantum effects which led ultimately to Bohr s theory of the hydrogen atom. Because of this central position it is perhaps not surprising that innumerable articles and books have been written on the subject since the seminal papers by Mendeleev in 1869, and some 700 forms of the periodic table (classified into 146 different types or subtypes) have been proposed. A brief historical survey of these developments is summarized in the Panel opposite. 

F. P. Venable, The Developmeni of ihe Periodic Law, Chemical Publishing Co., Easton. Pa., 1896. This i.s Ihe first general review of periodic tables and has an almost complete colleclion of those published to that lime. J. W. Van Spronsen. The Periodic Syeiem of ihe Chemical Elements, Elsevier. Amsterdam, 1969, 368 pp. An excellent modem account of the historical developments leading up to Mendeleev s table. 

Table 2.3 gives a description of the functional form used in some of the common force fields. The torsional energy is written as a Fourier series, typically of order three, in all cases. Many of the force fields undergo developments, and the number of atom types increases as more and more systems become parameterized thus Table 2.3 may be considered as a snapshot of the situation when the data were collected. The universal type force fields, described in Section 2.3.3, are in principle capable of covering molecules composed of elements from the whole periodic table, these have been labelled as all elements . 

Mendeleev developed the periodic table before the discovery of protons and electrons. Amazing ... 

Now we can see the development of the entire periodic table. The special stabilities of the inert gases are fixed by the large energy gaps in the energy level diagram, Figure 15-11. The number of orbitals in a cluster, multiplied by two because of our double occupancy assumption, fixes the number of electrons needed to reach the inert gas electron population. The numbers at the... 

Worrall had made similar claims regarding theories of light developed in the seventeenth century and in particular, the case of Fresnel whose dramatic and subsequently confirmed predictions had not been as influential as his accommodation of already known optical phenomena. Meanwhile, Stephen Brush had turned his attention to chemistry and the periodic table, given that this seemed to be a case for which successful predictions made by Mendeleev are widely held to have been the reason for the acceptance of the periodic... 

The use of the older restricted version of the Pauli principle has persisted, however, and is routinely employed to develop the electronic version of the periodic table. Modern chemistry appears to be committing two mistakes. Firstly, there is a rejection of the classical chemical heritage whereby the classification of elements is based on the accumulation of data on the properties and reactions of elements. Secondly, modem chemistry looks to physics with reverence and the false assumption that therein lies the underlying explanation to all of chemistry. Chemistry in common with all other branches of science appears to have succumbed to the prevailing tendency that attempts to reduce everything to physics (11). In the case of the Pauli principle, chemists frequently fall short of a full understanding of the subject matter, and... 

---