Particle size distribution normal-logarithmic

In order to use Eq. (14.30) we need to know the particle size distribution. In many cases it has been observed that the size distribution obeys normal probability distribution, or at least can be well approximated by it. In fact, the number of particles dN whose logarithm of diameter... 

Most systems of fine particles have the log-normal type of particle size distribution. That is, with the logarithm of the particle size, the particle size distribution follows the normal or Gaussian distribution in semilog scales. Therefore, the density function for the log-normal distribution can be expressed by... 

For standards see Table 1.1 Particle size, representation . Special distribution functions are specified in some standards (e.g., power distribution, logarithmic normal distribution, and RRSB distribution). The representation of particle size distributions and methods for their determination are described elsewhere. Methods of determination for pigments are rated in Section 1.2.2. 

The linear normal distribution (bell curve Gaussian normal distribution ) is generally suitable for very narrow particle-size distributions. The standardized, dimensionless shape of the normal distribution produces a straight line on semi-logarithmic probability paper. 

The above-discussed particle size distributions are shown, for the sake of comparison, as logarithmic normal distributions in Fig. 6.8 for the 6-blade turbine stirrer and different material systems. It emerges, that, with the exception of car-nauba wax, all organic liquids in the range investigated behaved similarly in this... 

If the particle size distribution is normal or log normal, then the data can be linearized by plotting the particle frequency as a function of particle rize on arithmetic or logarithmic probability graph p r respectively. The 50% value of sudi plots yields the geometric median diameter and the geometric standard deviation is the ratio of the 84.1% m the 50% values. 

Representation of results of particle size analysis - Part 1 Graphical representation Representation of results of particle size analysis - Part 2 Calculation of average particle sizes/ diameters and moments from particle size distributions Representation of results of particle size analysis - Part 3 Fitting of an experimental curve to a reference model (in preparation) Representation of results of particle size analysis - Part 4 Characterization of a classification process (in preparation) Representation of results of particle size analysis - Part 5 Validation of calculations relating to particle size analysis using logarithmic normal probability distribution (in preparation) Particle size analysis - Laser diffraction methods - Part 1 General principles... 

In accordance with the properties of a log-normal distribution, the standard deviationjs the difference between the logarithm of the median particle diameter (log rf) and the logarithm of the particle diameter corresponding to 16% of the particles adhering (log die), i e., a = log - log die The values of log d and log die can be obtained from particle size distribution data [16]. 

Because of its mathematical properties, the standard deviation a is almost exclusively used to measure the dispersion of the partiele size distribution. When the skewed particle size distribution shown in Fig. 9 is replotted using the logarithm of the particle size, the skewed curve is transformed into a symmetrical bellshaped curve as shown in Fig. 10. This transformation is of great significance and importance in that a symmetrical bell-shaped distribution is amenable to all the statistical procedures developed for the normal or gaussian distribution. 

The particle size distribution encountered most frequently obeys a normal logarithmic law [6] and in probability logarithmic coordinates may be expressed as a straight line (Fig. VI.7, line 1). 

The normal-logarithmic particle size distribution is approximated by the following expression [6] ... 

Eor (12.3) the authors are not in knowledge of a universally valid modification for polydisperse systems. Gregory [2] describes one possible modification, which requires that the particle size is logarithmic normally distributed and the root mean square deviation of the particle size distribution is known. But this information is not available for usual spray processes. Additionally, the polydispersity of the spray influences the root mean square deviation of the transmission T. The mean size of the particles, which are positioned in the light beam, is temporarily fluctuating. This... 

Answer We have no data regarding particle-size distributions other than logarithmic Gaussian distributions. These are the ones normally encountered, however. With them the tendency to remain logarithmic Gaussian in character is well supported by experiment. Figure 34 is representative of a number of distribution functions from an earlier paper (5). 

Defining characteristics of apparatuses for clearing of gas emissions are efficiency of separation and water resistance. Known methods of calculation of efficiency of the scrubbers based on the use of empirical functions, presenting parameters of fractional efficiency and dispersion composition of a dust, do not vary the significant accuracy. It is caused by the functions of mass particle size distribution of many industrial dusts which do not answer a logarithmically normal [lognormal] distribution because of the actions of several mechanisms of a dust formation. Use of some methods are inconvenient because of multistep, complexities, and labor contents of reception of initial data for calculation. 

Most frequently, an aerosol is characterized by its particle size distribution. Usually this distribution is reasonably well approximated by a log-normal frequency function (Fig. 4A). If the distribution is based on the logarithm of the particle size, the skewed log-normal distribution is transferred into the bell-shaped, gaussian error curve (see Fig. 4B). Consequently, two parameters are required to describe the particle size distribution of an aerosol the median particle diameter (MD), and an index of dispersion, the geometric standard deviation (Og). The MD of the log-normal frequency distribution is equivalent to the logarithmic mean and represents the 50% size cut of the distribution. The geometric standard deviation is derived from the cumulative distribution (see Fig. 4C) by... 

Most readers will be familiar with the bell-shaped normal distribution plotted in Fig. 9.12. When applied to the size distribution of particles, for example, such a distribution is fully characterized by the arithmetic mean D and the standard deviation a, where a is defined such that 68% of the particles have sizes in the range D a In the log-normal distribution, the logarithm of the diameter D is assumed to have a normal distribution. (Either logarithms to the base 10 or loga-... 

The size distributions of the fractions were plotted on log-probability paper as particle diameter (in microns) against cumulative percent of particles smaller than the indicated size. Figure 1 shows such a plot for the Johnie Boy size fractions. Such plots were compared for several samples with similar plots on linear-probability paper. Almost always the data could be described better by a lognormal rather than by a normal distribution law, after proper allowance for the presence of a maximum and a minimum size in each fraction. The parameters of the distributions were determined from the graph the geometric mean as the 50% point (median) and the logarithmic standard deviation as the ratio of the diameters at the 84 and 50% points. 

The shape of the size distribution function for aerosol particles is often broad enough that distinct parts of the function make dominant contributions to various moments. This concept is useful for certain kinds of practical approximations. In the case of atomospheric aerosols the number distribution is heavily influenced by the radius range of 0.005-0.1 /xm, but the surface area and volume fraction, respectively, are dominated by the range 0.1-1.0 fxm and larger. The shape of the size distribution is often fit to a logarithmic-normal form. Other common forms are exponential or power law decrease with increasing size. 

It was observed many years ago that particle size data which were skewed and did not fit a normal distribution would very often fit a normal distribution if frequency were plotted against the logarithm of particle size instead of particle size alone. This tended to spread out the smaller size ranges and compress the larger ones. If the new plot then looked like a normal distribution, the particles were said to be lognormally distributed and the distribution was called a lognormal distribution. By analogy with a normal distribution, the mean and standard deviation became... 

Inside this cloud the size distribution of particles can be characterized by normal-logarithmic distribution with r = 0.25 ftm, cr = 2.0 (for particles with r < 3 tim) and the power law (y = 4.0), to describe the trail of distribution in the range of particle sizes 3 — 1,000 M-m. Cn values in such clouds are greatest for the submicron fraction. About 8% of the total SDA mass in the cloud are assumed to be particles with r < 1 p.m. The complex refractive index, m of dust particles in clouds is assumed to be 1.5-O.OOli [38]. Figure 1 shows model temporal dependences of the vertical optical thickness, c, of a post-nuclear dust cloud, calculated for the Northern Hemisphere [38]. As is seen, "c values (0.55 (tm), immediately upon the formation of the cloud, can vary from 0.25 to 3, depending on the SDA mass concentration in the cloud and on its size distribution. 

The coefficients of the model are calculated by linear regression (the logarithm of the particle size was used here) and then plotted as a cumulative distribution of a normal plot (Fig. 2). The important coefficients are those that are strongly positive or negative, for example, the spray rate and the interaction between atomization pressure and inlet temperature 35. Others not identified on the diagram are not considered significant and could well be representative mainly of experimental error. The equation can thus be simplified to include only the important terms. However, if interactions are included, their main... 

---