Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle momentum mesoscale

Microscale fluid turbulence is, by deflnition, present only when the continuous fluid phase is present. The coefficients Bpv describe the interaction of the particle phase with the continuous phase. In contrast, Bpvf models rapid fluctuations in the fluid velocity seen by the particle that are not included in the mesoscale drag term Ap. In the mesoscale particle momentum balance, the term that generates Bpv will depend on the fluid-phase mass density and, hence, will be null when the fluid material density (pf) is null. In any case, Bpv models momentum transfer to/from the particle phase in fluid-particle systems for which the total momentum is conserved (see discussion leading to Eq. (5.17)). [Pg.139]

This formulation is particularly convenient when Euler-Lagrange simulations are used to approximate the disperse multiphase flow in terms of a fimte sample of particles. As discussed in Sections 5.2 and 5.3, although some of the mesoscale variables are intensive (i.e. independent of the particle mass), it is usually best to start with a conserved extensive variable (e.g. particle mass or particle momentum) when deriving the single-particle models. For example, in Chapter 4 we found that must have at least one component, corresponding to the fluid mass seen by a particle, in order to describe cases in which the disperse-phase volume fraction is not constant. [Pg.141]

The mesoscale models for momentum transfer between phases differ quite substantially depending on the multiphase system under investigation, and different semi-empirical relationships have been developed for different systems. Since the nature of the disperse phase is particularly important, the available mesoscale models are generally divided into those valid for fluid-fluid and those valid for fluid-solid systems. The main difference is that in fluid-fluid systems the elements of the disperse phase are deformable particles (i.e. bubbles or droplets), whereas in fluid-solid systems the disperse phase is constituted by particles of constant shape. Typical fluid-fluid systems for which the mesoscale models reported below apply are gas-liquid, liquid-liquid, and liquid-gas systems. The mesoscale models reported for fluid-solid systems are valid both for gas-solid and for liquid-solid systems. As a general rule, the mesoscale model for Afp should be derived starting from a single-particle momentum balance ... [Pg.161]

This is a very important point because the added-mass term will modify the model for when other forces are included. In fact, for the general formulation, one should start with the single-particle momentum balance in Eq. (5.82) and add the other forces on the right-hand side. The final mesoscale model for Afp will have all of the terms on the right-hand side multiplied by the added-mass factor CvmPf/(pp + C vmPf)- In other words, due to the added mass, Afp cannot be found by simply adding together the models for the individual forces. See Section 5.3.4 for more details. [Pg.172]

Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) is a technique for simulating the motion of mesoscale beads. The technique is superficially similar to a Brownian dynamics simulation in that it incorporates equations of motion, a dissipative (random) force, and a viscous drag between moving beads. However, the simulation uses a modified velocity Verlet algorithm to ensure that total momentum and force symmetries are conserved. This results in a simulation that obeys the Navier-Stokes equations and can thus predict flow. In order to set up these equations, there must be parameters to describe the interaction between beads, dissipative force, and drag. [Pg.274]

In the formulation of a mesoscale model, the number-density function (NDF) plays a key role. For this reason, we discuss the properties of the NDF in some detail in Chapter 2. In words, the NDF is the number of particles per unit volume with a given set of values for the mesoscale variables. Since at any time instant a microscale particle will have a unique set of microscale variables, the NDF is also referred to as the one-particle NDF. In general, the one-particle NDF is nonzero only for realizable values of the mesoscale variables. In other words, the realizable mesoscale values are the ones observed in the ensemble of all particles appearing in the microscale simulation. In contrast, sets of mesoscale values that are never observed in the microscale simulations are non-realizable. Realizability constraints may occur for a variety of reasons, e.g. due to conservation of mass, momentum, energy, etc., and are intrinsic properties of the microscale model. It is also important to note that the mesoscale values are usually strongly correlated. By this we mean that the NDF for any two mesoscale variables cannot be reconstructed from knowledge of the separate NDFs for each variable. Thus, by construction, the one-particle NDF contains all of the underlying correlations between the mesoscale variables for only one particle. [Pg.18]

Figure 1.4. An example of the volume-fraction field for a highly non-equilibrium flow with Knp = oo. Left the hydrodynamic model predicts that particle clouds cannot cross and all particles end up with zero y momentum. Right the mesoscale model predicts that particle clouds will cross in the absence of collisions. Adapted from Freret et al. (2008). Figure 1.4. An example of the volume-fraction field for a highly non-equilibrium flow with Knp = oo. Left the hydrodynamic model predicts that particle clouds cannot cross and all particles end up with zero y momentum. Right the mesoscale model predicts that particle clouds will cross in the absence of collisions. Adapted from Freret et al. (2008).
When the velocity of the particle phase is different than that of the fluid phase, the transfer of mass between phases will also result in the transfer of momentum. For example, if we let be the mass of a particle and be the fluid mass seen by the particle, then conservation of mass at the mesoscale leads to... [Pg.160]

These relationships are valid for isolated bubbles moving under laminar flow conditions. In the case of turbulent flow, the effect of turbulent eddies impinging on the bubble surface is to increase the drag forces. This is typically accounted for by introducing an effective fluid viscosity (rather than the molecular viscosity of the continuous phase, yUf) defined as pi.eff = Pi + C pts, where ef is the turbulence-dissipation rate in the fluid phase and Cl is a constant that is usually taken equal to 0.02. This effective viscosity, which is used for the calculation of the bubble/particle Reynolds number (Bakker van den Akker, 1994), accounts for the turbulent reduction of slip due to the increased momentum transport around the bubble, which is in turn related to the ratio of bubble size and turbulence length scale. However, the reader is reminded that the mesoscale model does not include macroscale turbulence and, hence, using an effective viscosity that is based on the macroscale turbulence is not appropriate. [Pg.167]

Invoking conservation of momentum at the mesoscale then leads to the following expression for the fluid velocity seen by the particle ... [Pg.171]

In order to complete our discussion on momentum transfer, we must consider the final forms of the mesoscale acceleration models in the presence of all the fluid-particle forces. When the virtual-mass force is included, the mesoscale acceleration models must be derived starting from the force balance on a single particle ... [Pg.175]

As can be seen from Eq. (5.100), the virtual-mass force reduces the drag and lift forces by a factor of 1 /y. The buoyancy force is not modified because we have chosen to define it in terms of the effective volume Vpy. We remind the reader that the mesoscale acceleration model for the fluid seen by the particle A j must be consistent with the mesoscale model for the particle phase A p in order to ensure that the overall system conserves momentum at the mesoscale. (See Section 4.3.8 for more details.) As discussed near Eq. (5.14) on page 144, this is accomplished in the single-particle model by constraining the model for Apf given the model for Afp (which is derived from the force terms introduced in this section). Thus, as in Eqs. (5.98) and (5.99), it is not necessary to derive separate models for the momentum-transfer terms appearing in Apf. [Pg.177]

The first technique is known as the stochastic rotational dynamics (SRD) method or multiparticle collision dynamics, which is a particle-based algorithm suited to account for hydrodynamic interactions on the mesoscale. The coarse-grained solvent is described as ideal-gas particles that propagate via streaming and collision steps, which are constructed such that the dynamics conserves mass, momentum, and energy. [Pg.27]


See other pages where Particle momentum mesoscale is mentioned: [Pg.162]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.269]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 , Pg.103 , Pg.139 , Pg.141 , Pg.202 ]




SEARCH



Mesoscale

© 2024 chempedia.info