Particle dimensions, determination

A typical virus with helical symmetry is the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). This is an RNA virus in which the 2130 identical protein subunits (each 158 amino acids in length) are arranged in a helix. In TMV, the helix has 16 1/2 subunits per turn and the overall dimensions of the virus particle are 18 X 300 nm. The lengths of helical viruses are determined by the length of the nucleic acid, but the width of the helical virus particle is determined by the size and packing of the protein subunits. 

In practical application, it was reported that the platinum particles dispersed in highly porous carbonized polyacrylonitrile (PAN) microcellular foam used as fuel-cell electrocatalyst160 have the partially active property. The fractal dimension of the platinum particles was determined to be smaller than 2.0 by using the potentiostatic current transient technique in oxygen-saturated solutions, and it was considered to be a reaction dimension, indicating that not all of the platinum particle surface sites are accessible to the incoming oxygen molecules. 

The nature and relevance of colloids is one of the main current research topics (Birdi, 2002). They are an important class of materials, intermediate between bulk and molecularly dispersed systems. Colloid particles may be spherical but, in some cases, one dimension can be much larger than the other two (as in a needle-like shape). The size of particles also determines whether they can be seen by the naked eye. Colloids are not visible to the naked eye or under an ordinary optical microscope. The scattering of light can be suitably used to see such colloidal particles (such as dust particles, etc.). Their size then may range from 1() 4 to 1() 7 cm. The units used are as follows ... 

Thus the one-particle basis determines the MOs, which in turn determine the JV-particle basis. If the one-paxticle basis were complete, it would at least in principle be possible to form a complete jV-particle basis, and hence to obtain an exact wave function variationally. This wave function is sometimes referred to as the complete Cl wave function. However, a complete one-paxticle basis would be of infinite dimension, so the one-paxticle basis must be truncated in practical applications. In that case, the iV-particle basis will necessarily be incomplete, but if all possible iV-paxticle basis functions axe included we have a full Cl wave function. Unfortunately, the factorial dependence of the iV-paxticle basis size on the one-particle basis size makes most full Cl calculations impracticably large. We must therefore commonly use truncated jV-paxticle spaces that axe constructed from truncated one-paxticle spaces. These two truncations, JV-particle and one-particle, are the most important sources of uncertainty in quantum chemical calculations, and it is with these approximations that we shall be mostly concerned in this course. We conclude this section by pointing out that while the analysis so fax has involved a configuration-interaction approach to solving Eq. 1.2, the same iV-particle and one-particle space truncation problems arise in non-vaxiational methods, as will be discussed in detail in subsequent chapters. 

Electrophoresis of nonconducting colloidal particles has been reviewed in this chapter. One important parameter determining the electrophoretic velocity of a particle is the ratio of the double layer thickness to the particle dimension. This leads to Smoluchowski s equation and Huckel s prediction for the particle mobility at the two extrema of the ratio when deformation of the double layer is negligible. Distortion of the ion cloud arising from application of the external electric field becomes significant for high zeta potential. An opposite electric field is therefore induced in the deformed double layer so as to retard the particle s migration. 

The relationship between crystallites and particles with respect to XRD is shown in Figure 2. The morphological "crystal" "c" is composed of anisotropic crystallites with dimensions "a,b". The arrows show the difference in dimension detected by XRD (a,b in two dimensions) and by other methods not requiring coherent scattering methods such as electron microscopy or gas adsorption. It is obvious that there may be little relationship between the particle size determined by microscopy or surface area analysis and the... 

Microfiltration is a unit operation for the separation of small particles. The separation limits are between 0.02 and 10 (jum particle dimensions. Microfiltration can be carried out in a dead-end mode and a cross-flow mode. In downstream processing, the cross-flow filtration is carried out continuously or discontinuously. The most important parameters that determine the productivity of cross-flow microfiltration are transmembrane pressure, velocity, particle size and surface, viscosity of the liquid and additives such as surfactants, and changing the surface and surface tension. 

Sedimentation-FFF. Retention measurements give the effective particle mass m (buoyant mass). If the particle density is known, the particle mass m, particle volume Vp, and hydrodynamic diameter dH can be calculated [80,81]. Apart from the particle dimensions, the density can be determined as well [82] as the difference in the densities of the solute and the solvent, Ap, is linearly correlated to X. Fractionation can be used in regions where the solvent density is lower than the solute density (pps. The determination of particle density in a single experiment is possible by sedimentation-flotation focusing-FFF [72,73,83] analogous to density gradient ultracentrifugation. 

The present results differ significantly from those of Clark and Wilson ( [3 ], pp. 9—128) who discussed some fluid mechanical aspects of flotation processes. The reason for this disagreement is the different dimensions of both particles and hubbies taken in their theoretical treatment and those determined here experimentally. The particle diameters determined under the non-stationary conditions as the most probable values are in the range 100—150 pm. As it has been already mentioned, the air bubble diameters are comparable to these values and are equal to 40 and 65 pm in the DAF and DIS system, respectively. In contrast to this tha above authors assumed the air bubble diameters (about 200 pm) to be much larger from the particle diameter (about 0.2 pm). 

---