Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pairs of values

Fig. 8.3 Two random distributions obtained by plotting pairs of values from a linear congruential random genera The distribution (a) was obtained using m—32 769, a = 10924, b = 11830. The distribution (bj was obtained usi, m = 6075, a = 106, b = 1283. Data from [Sharp and Bays 1992]. Fig. 8.3 Two random distributions obtained by plotting pairs of values from a linear congruential random genera The distribution (a) was obtained using m—32 769, a = 10924, b = 11830. The distribution (bj was obtained usi, m = 6075, a = 106, b = 1283. Data from [Sharp and Bays 1992].
In the first one, the desorption rates and the corresponding desorbed amounts at a set of particular temperatures are extracted from the output data. These pairs of values are then substituted into the Arrhenius equation, and from their temperature dependence its parameters are estimated. This is the most general treatment, for which a more empirical knowledge of the time-temperature dependence is sufficient, and which in principle does not presume a constancy of the parameters in the Arrhenius equation. It requires, however, a graphical or numerical integration of experimental data and in some cases their differentiation as well, which inherently brings about some loss of information and accuracy, The reliability of the temperature estimate throughout the whole experiment with this... [Pg.346]

It may happen that there are two (or more) values of the dependent variable for one pair of values of the independent variables. Thus, a liquid exhibiting a maximum density (e.g., water at 4° C.) will have at least two values of 6, on opposite sides of this state, for given values of v and p. A plane diagram, therefore, does not always adequately represent the states of such a fluid. [Pg.44]

Let us consider unit mass of a fluid in a given state. Since the equations which we shall deduce in this paragraph do not depend on any particular thermometric scale, we shall represent the temperature by 6, where 6 may be the Centigrade temperature, or may be measured on any other temperature scale. The state of the fluid is therefore represented by (v, p, 6). If one of these variables increases by an infinitesimal amount there will, in general, be a corresponding increment in the value of each of the others, and there could be an infinite number of corresponding pairs of values of the latter for one value of the former. But if two variables are fixed, the state of the fluid is completely defined, for it has only two degrees of freedom ( 26). [Pg.117]

The determination of biaxially oriented film is comparatively straightforward, as the radiation propagates in the direction normal to the plane of the film and the polarization direction is parallel or perpendicular to the draw direction. theoretical analysis are given in detail in a separate publication 6). [Pg.90]

There is hardly any experimental data needed to assess the effect of differences in the apparatus. There are only isolated values for flashpoint PMoc (Pensky-Martens open cup), only two pairs of values for Tcc and PMcc and only three pairs of values for Toe and Coc (Coc Cleveland open cup). [Pg.58]

Plot each pair of values that are shown in the data table. Show each set of data as a point with a small circle drawn around it. [Pg.14]

In Chapters 63 through 67 [1-5], we devised a test for the amount of nonlinearity present in a set of comparative data (e.g., as are created by any of the standard methods of calibration for spectroscopic analysis), and then discovered a flaw in the method. The concept of a measure of nonlinearity that is independent of the units that the X and Y data have is a good one. The flaw is that the nonlinearity measurement depends on the distribution of the data uniformly distributed data will provide one value, Normally distributed data will provide a different value, randomly distributed (i.e., what is commonly found in real data sets) will give still a different value, and so forth, even if the underlying relationship between the pairs of values is the same in all cases. [Pg.459]

Find the equation for the regression line ofy on x for the following pairs of values. Plot the graph and comment upon its characteristics. [Pg.25]

Using the connector notation discussed earlier, a typical design might look like the configuration of component instances shown in Figure 10.6. The connectors represent couplings between properties of two components (—> a pair of values is kept continually in sync) or events of two components (—> a published occurrence from one component triggers a method of another component). [Pg.428]

Our approach to the first strategy requires that we construct a table with the pairs of values of x, and yt fisted in order of increasing values of T, (percentage response). Beside each of these columns a set of blank columns should be left so that the transformed values may be fisted. We then simply add the columns described in the linear regression procedure. Log and probit values may be taken from any of a number of sets of tables and the rest of the table is then developed from these transformed x and j/- values (denoted as x and y ). A standard linear regression is then performed. [Pg.933]

Assigning uncertainties to experimental (or even theoretical [33]) results is a very important issue and deserves careful consideration. As already pointed out, this is not observed in many recent publications, hindering (to some extent) a reliable assessment of the data given there. If the accepted rules are followed, we may draw useful conclusions from the error bars. For instance, when the difference between two literature values for the enthalpy of the same reaction is larger than the sum of the respective uncertainties, it is likely that at least one of the results is affected by systematic errors. This is the case, for example, of two literature values for Ac//0[Fc(q5-C51 (5)2, cr], —5891.5 4.2 kj mol-1 and —5877.7 5.0 kJ mol-1 [31 ]. On the other hand, if the difference between a pair of values is smaller than the sum of the uncertainties, as in Af77°(LiOC2H5, cr), —477.1 4.0 kJ mol-1 and —473.1 2.5 kj mol-1 [25], we may conclude that systematic errors are probably absent in both results. [Pg.20]

In the calibration problem two related quantities, X and Y, are investigated where Y, the response variable, is relatively easy to measure while X, the amount or concentration variable, is relatively difficult to measure in terms of cost or effort Furthermore, the measurement error for X is small compared with that of Y The experimenter observes a calibration set of N pairs of values (x, y ), i l,...,N, of the quantities X and Y, x being the known standard amount or concentration values and y the chromatographic response from the known standard The calibration graph is determined from this set of calibration samples using regression techniques Additional values of the dependent variable Y, say y., j l,, M, where M is arbitrary, are also observed whose corresponding X values, x. are the unknown quantities of interest The statistical literature on the calibration problem considers the estimation of these unknown values, x, from the observed and the... [Pg.138]

Differences in measurement methods include analyzer systems based both on the same and on different measurement principles. The average standard deviation in the performance of different chemiluminescent ozone instruments that are sampling the same ambient air both with and without an added ozone concentration of 0.(X)2-0.5 ppm is 6-10%. Field studies comparing an ultraviolet monitor with several chemiluminescent monitors showed correlation coefficients for hourly averages of 0.80-0.95 between various pairs of instruments. Hourly averages for about 500 pairs of values at ambient ozone concentrations of 0.005-0.100 ppm showed deviations of 3-23% between the average values for paired instruments. [Pg.275]

Given 2 and ij, this determines J and hence the energy and the wave function coefficients. The corresponding value of 2 is calculated from Equation (13). Pairs of values of 2 and 2 for which homopolar (P states exist when = 1 lie on the curves in Fig. 6. There are two branches, both having 2 = 2 and 2 = — 2 as asymptotes. Starting high up on the upper branch, we are in the (P9l region of Fig. 2. One homopolar

[Pg.19]

Apply linear least square regression to the pairs of values... [Pg.199]

Table l4-3 gives a few values that will be used in subsequent examples and problems. The symbol for standard enthalpies of formation is AH°f, where the superscript denotes standard and the subscript denotes formation. Look up both elemental sulfur and nitrogen to see that the standard enthalpies for elements are 0. Then find the pairs of values for IT2O and CCI4 (carbon tetrachloride) to learn that the enthalpy depends on the state of matter. [Pg.142]

The point that solids have low entropies and gases have high entropies has already been made. An examination of the values in the table should convince you that this is indeed a valid generalization. Compare the pairs of values for the two states of H2O and also the two states of lithium. [Pg.146]

The regeneration problem when to stop a run and either discard or regenerate the catalyst. This problem is easy to treat once the first problem has been solved for a range of run times and final catalyst activities. Note each pair of values for time and final activity yields the corresponding mean conversion.)... [Pg.489]


See other pages where Pairs of values is mentioned: [Pg.166]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.389 , Pg.455 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.393 , Pg.459 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info