Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Canonical orthogonalization

A possibly more accurate value for the double bond character of the bonds in benzene (0.46) id obtained by considering all five canonical structures with weights equal to the squares of their coefficients in the wave function. There is some uncertainty aS to the significance of thfa, however, because of- the noii -orthogOnality of the wave functions for the canonical structures, and foF chemical purposes it fa sufficiently accurate to follow the simple procedure adopted above. [Pg.203]

The comparison of these results with the simple theory of conjugated systems [Pauling and Sherman, J. Chem. Phys., 1, 679 (1933)] not straightforward because of non-orthogonality of the canonical structures. If we assume that the double bond character... [Pg.204]

A possibly more reliable prediction can be made on the basis of Sherman s wave function for naphthalene,16 by considering all 42 canonical structures. The fractional double bond character of a bond can be considered to be given approximately (neglecting non-orthogonality of the canonical wave functions) by the expression... [Pg.206]

All three states were described by a single set of SCF molecular orbitals based on the occupied canonical orbitals of the X Z- state and a transformation of the canonical virtual space known as "K-orbitals" [10] which, among other properties, approximate the set of natural orbitals. Transition moments within orthogonal basis functions are easier to derive. For the X state the composition of the reference space was obtained by performing two Hartree-Fock single and double excitations (HFSD-CI) calculations at two typical intemuclear distances, i.e. R. (equilibrium geometry) and about 3Re,and adding to the HF... [Pg.320]

The next pair of canonical variates, t2 and U2 also has maximum correlation P2, subject, however, to the condition that this second pair should be uncorrelated to the first pair, i.e. t t2 = u U2 = 0. For the example at hand, this second canonical correlation is much lower p2 = 0.55 R = 0.31). For larger data sets, the analysis goes on with extracting additional pairs of canonical variables, orthogonal to the previous ones, until the data table with the smaller number of variables has been... [Pg.319]

Thus, we see that CCA forms a canonical analysis, namely a decomposition of each data set into a set of mutually orthogonal components. A similar type of decomposition is at the heart of many types of multivariate analysis, e.g. PCA and PLS. Under the assumption of multivariate normality for both populations the canonical correlations can be tested for significance [6]. Retaining only the significant canonical correlations may allow for a considerable dimension reduction. [Pg.320]

The purpose of Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression is to find a small number A of relevant factors that (i) are predictive for Y and (u) utilize X efficiently. The method effectively achieves a canonical decomposition of X in a set of orthogonal factors which are used for fitting Y. In this respect PLS is comparable with CCA, RRR and PCR, the difference being that the factors are chosen according to yet another criterion. [Pg.331]

At this point it should be noted that, in addition to the discussed previously, the canonical Hartree-Fock equations (26) have additional solutions with higher eigenvalues e . These are called virtual orbitals, because they are unoccupied in the 2iV-electron ground state SCF wavefunction 0. They are orthogonal to the iV-dimensional orbital space associated with this wavefunction. [Pg.40]

The Eqs. (33) and (34) could be used for a practical determination of the localized orbitals. So far, however, a different procedure has been used which is based on the premise that the canonical orbitals are determined first. From these, the localized orbitals are then obtained by a sequence of 2 X 2 orthogonal transformations which iteratively increase the localization sum until it reaches the maximum. 17>... [Pg.44]

FIGURE 4.27 Canonical correlation analysis (CCA), x-scores are uncorrelated v-scores are uncorrelated pairs of x- and y-sores (for instance t and Ui) have maximum correlation loading vectors are in general not orthogonal. Score plots are connected projections of x- and y-space. [Pg.178]

Sasaki and coworkers have examined reversible metal coordination as a mechanism for DCL generation in the presence of lectin biomolecules [49,50]. The use of metal ions in reversible processes is canonical to supramolecular chemistry, and has been explicitly demonstrated for doublelevel orthogonal DCLs by Lehn and Eliseev [51]. Sasaki s system is designed around octahedral Fe(II) bipyridine complexes. The bipyridine-modified A-acetylgalactosamine (bipy-GalNAc) (78) was found to trimer-ize in the presence of Fe(II) to afford a 3 1 mixture of the fac (79) and mer (80) diastereoisomers, each as a racemic mixture (A+A) (Scheme 2.12). [Pg.74]

Investigation shows that N is far from unique. Indeed, if N satisfies Eq. (1.47), NU will also work, where U is any unitary matrix. A possible candidate for N is shown in Eq. (1.18). If we put restrictions on N, the result can be made unique. If N is forced to be upper triangular, one obtains the classical Schmidt orthogonalization of the basis. The transformation of Eq. (1.18), as it stands, is frequently called the canonical orthogonalization of the basis. Once the basis is orthogonalized the weights are easily determined in the normal sense as... [Pg.19]

What can we see from these results The point x° is not a maximum, since the first eigenvalue is positive. Selecting the canonical variables w 0, w2 = w3 = № can increase the value of . By orthogonality of the... [Pg.60]

The simplest way to illustrate physical meaning of these quantities is to consider the perturbations of orthogonally twisted ethylene for which SAB = yAB = <5ab = yab = 0 holds via (1) return to planarity or (2) substitution at one end of the C=C bond. For (1), localized orbitals interact, yAB 0, but their energies are the same, 5AB = 0. Since delocalized orbitals become eventually HOMO and LUMO of planar ethylene, they do not have the same energy, Sab 0, but they do not interact, yab = 0. For (2), orthogonal-substituted ethylene, the situation is different. In the localized basis SAB 0, but the interaction is not present due to the symmetry yAn = 0. (A and 2 S belong to different irreducible representations.) For the delocalized description the energies of these orbitals are the same 5ab = 0 since the orbitals are equally distributed over both carbon atoms. But yab 0, since a and b are not canonical orbitals. [Pg.56]

Most organic chemists are familiar with two very different and conflicting descriptions of the 7r-electron system in benzene molecular orbital (MO) theory with delocalized orthogonal orbitals and valence bond (VB) theory with resonance between various canonical structures. An attitude fostered by many text books, especially at the undergraduate level, is that the VB description is much easier to understand and simpler to use, but that MO theory is in some sense more fundamental . [Pg.42]

To illustrate the modifications of UHF formalism, it is convenient to consider pure spin symmetry for a single Slater determinant with Nc doubly occupied spatial orbitals Xi and N0 singly occupied orbitals y". The corresponding UHF state has Na mj = occupied spin orbitals and Np rns = — J, occupied spin orbitals f. The number of open-shell and closed-shell orbitals are, respectively Na = Na — Np > 0 and Nc = Np. Occupation numbers for the spatial orbitals are nc = 2, n ° = 1. If all orbital functions are normalized, a canonical form of the RHF reference state is defined by orthogonalizing the closed- and open-shell sets separately. [Pg.62]

Although such nanotubes form an interesting structure with potential for exterior functionalization, they are currently limited to passive transport/ release of molecules in the interior. Future work may focus on using non-canonical amino acids to impart functionalizable interior surfaces to allow orthogonal functionalization of the interior and exterior surfaces (ten Cate et al., 2006). [Pg.216]

The most convenient way to plot a projection of an w-dimensional system in an m-dimensional linear projective subspace is to use multiple orthogonal projection, in which the directions of projection rays are parallel to the normal vectors (qi, q>,. .., qn-m) defining the projective subspace. Under this projection, a point is first projected in the direction of qi, then of q/, and so on. A convenient set of canonical coordinates describing the projective subspace is given by... [Pg.344]

Equation (9) describes a linear stoichiometric variety of dimension R. A reactive projection is defined as a multiple orthogonal projection from a C-dimensional space to a (C - R - 1)-dimensional subspace, where the directions of the R projection rays follow the directions of (qi, q>,. .., q ) defined in Eq. (10). Such projection causes the stoichiometric variety to disappear, leaving a reaction-invariant projection. The set of canonical coordinates defining the projective subspace can be found by substituting Eq. (10) into Eqs. (2)—(4) [7]. [Pg.346]


See other pages where Canonical orthogonalization is mentioned: [Pg.320]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.203]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 , Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Canonical orthogonalization application

© 2024 chempedia.info