Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optical evaluation functions

Because the dispersed acoustic function 3.69, the optic continuum function 3.71, and the Einstein function 3.73 may be tabulated for the limiting values of undi-mensionalized frequencies (see tables 1, 2, 3 in Kieffer, 1979c), the evaluation of Cy reduces to the appropriate choice of lower and upper cutoff frequencies for the optic continuum (i.e., X/ and limits of integration in eq. 3.71), of the three... [Pg.140]

Integral cross sections for selected electron-impact excitation and ionisation processes have been largely obtained by measuring optical excitation functions. These need to be corrected to a varying degree of accuracy for effects such as cascade contributions and photon polarisation. The details of the experimental procedures, sources of errors and data evaluation have been discussed by Heddle and Keesing (1968). [Pg.11]

D. B. Ramachary, Y. V. Reddy, A. Baneijee, S. Baneqee, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7282-7286. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of optically pure functionalized spiro[5,5]undecane-l,5,9-triones as HIV-1 inhibitors. [Pg.70]

Perhaps the most significant complication in the interpretation of nanoscale adhesion and mechanical properties measurements is the fact that the contact sizes are below the optical limit ( 1 t,im). Macroscopic adhesion studies and mechanical property measurements often rely on optical observations of the contact, and many of the contact mechanics models are formulated around direct measurement of the contact area or radius as a function of experimentally controlled parameters, such as load or displacement. In studies of colloids, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to view particle/surface contact sizes from the side to measure contact radius [3]. However, such a configuration is not easily employed in AFM and nanoindentation studies, and undesirable surface interactions from charging or contamination may arise. For adhesion studies (e.g. Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) [4] and probe-tack tests [5,6]), the probe/sample contact area is monitored as a function of load or displacement. This allows evaluation of load/area or even stress/strain response [7] as well as comparison to and development of contact mechanics theories. Area measurements are also important in traditional indentation experiments, where hardness is determined by measuring the residual contact area of the deformation optically [8J. For micro- and nanoscale studies, the dimensions of both the contact and residual deformation (if any) are below the optical limit. [Pg.194]

Abstract Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics is addressed. The most popular wavefront sensors are described. Restoring the wavefront is an inverse problem, of which the bases are explained. An estimator of the slope of the wavefront is the image centroid. The Cramer-Rao lower bound is evaluated for several probability distribution function... [Pg.375]

However, considering practical limitations, that is, the availability of optically pure enantiomers, E values are more commonly determined on racemates by evaluating the enantiomeric excess values as a function of the extent of conversion in batch reactions. For irreversible reactions, the E value can be calculated from Equation 1 (when the enantiomeric excess ofthe product is known) or from Equation 2 (when the enantiomeric excess ofthe substrate is knovm) [la]. For reversible reactions, which may be the case in enzymatic resolution carried out in organic solvents (especially at extents of conversion higher than 40%), Equations 3 or 4, in which the reaction equilibrium constant has been introduced, should be used [lb]. [Pg.3]

Stopping the reaction before completion. This method is very similar to the asymmetric syntheses discussed on page 132. A method has been developed to evaluate the enantiomeric ratio of kinetic resolution using only the extent of substrate conversion. An important application of this method is the resolution of racemic alkenes by treatment with optically active diisopinocampheylborane, since alkenes do not easily lend themselves to conversion to diastereomers if no other functional groups are present. Another example is the resolution of allylic alcohols such as (56 with one... [Pg.154]

My interest at that time revolved around evaluating optical rotary dispersion data [12]. The paired values of optical rotation vs. wavelength were used to fit a function called the Drude equation (later modified to the Moffitt equation for William Moffitt [Harvard University] who developed the theory) [13]. The coefficients of the evaluated equation were shown to be related to a significant ultraviolet absorption band of a protein and to the amount of alpha-helix conformation existing in the solution of it. [Pg.6]

The introduction of 2-[4-(dimethylamino)phenylazo]benzoic acid into a silica sol allows the preparation of pH-sensitive doped coatings upon glass substrates. The behavior of this system was evaluated as the function of pH changes in liquid and gas media68. Optical absorption and sensitivity against pH were monitored by Vis spectroscopy. Chemical and mechanical stability tests carried out with coatings demonstrated that they were resistant enough to be use in sensor devices for pH measurements in laboratories. [Pg.368]

The initial stages, notably the formation of a monolayer on a foreign substrate at underpotentials, were mainly studied by classical electrochemical techniques, such as cyclic voltammetry [8, 9], potential-step experiments or impedance spectroscopy [10], and by optical spectroscopies, e.g., by differential reflectance [11-13] or electroreflectance [14] spectroscopy, in an attempt to evaluate the optical and electronic properties of thin metal overlayers as function of their thickness. Competently written reviews on the classic approach to metal deposition, which laid the basis of our present understanding and which still is indispensable for a thorough investigation of plating processes, are found in the literature [15-17]. [Pg.108]

These derivations have been described in detail (15). However, the relationship in Equation 5 was found to be very unsuitable for the determination of yij, since the curvatures are not easily evaluated from the photographic images. Especially, the older studies were unsatisfactory, arising from the inadequate optical and photographic techniques. In a later analysis an empirical procedure was described (21) which defined a function, S, which determines the drop shape as ... [Pg.331]

Two component, positive photoresists (see Section 3.5.b) represent systems with unusual exposure characteristics caused by the standing wave effect (see Section 2.1.f) and "bleaching" or change in optical density during exposure (see Sections 3.5 and 3.9). Both of these phenomena result in nonlinear exposure throughout the thickness of the resist film, and result in uneven developing rates as a function of film thickness, making evaluation of these systems difficult. [Pg.201]

Eqs. (4.140) and (4.150)-(4.152) are used to evaluate the response of the model composites in cyclic loading and the displacements 6 and 8, can be expressed as a function of the alternating stress, Aff, and the number of cycles, N. In experiments, degradation of the interface properties, e.g., the coefficient of friction, p or A(= 2pjfc/a), can also be expressed in terms of the cyclic loading parameters, Aoptical methods (with a microscope) or by means of more complicated instruments (see for example Naaman et al. (1992)) in fiber pull-out. Alternatively, they can be directly determined from the load and load-point displacement records in the case of fiber push-out. [Pg.160]


See other pages where Optical evaluation functions is mentioned: [Pg.371]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.1083]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.49]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.589 ]




SEARCH



Evaluation function

Function, optical

Optical evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info