Operator spin-annihilation

The operator annihilates a spin-up electron at p G A, and the operator b annihilates a spin-down electron The electrostatic operator... 

Another potential problem is that the wave function may be contaminated not only by state s -F 1, but also states. v - - 2, s -F 3, etc. The s -F 1 annihilation operator will reduce the weights of these states in the annihilated wave function, but it will not eliminate them. Inspection of Eq. (C.33) should make clear that the higher states will contribute to the PUHF energy if they appear on both the left and right sides of the Hamiltonian expectation values with non-zero coefficients. When such contamination is important, recourse to a more complete projection operator, that annihilates an arbitrary number of spin states is available, but the computational cost increases to essentially that of an MP4 calculation. Note that the problems of the orbitals being non-ideal for the pure lowest spin state persist in this instance. 

UHF Methods. A major drawback of closed-shell SCF orbitals is that whilst electrons of the same spin are kept apart by the Pauli principle, those of opposite spin are not accounted for properly. The repulsion between paired electrons in spin orbitals with the same spatial function is underestimated and this leads to the correlation error which multi-determinant methods seek to rectify. Some improvement could be obtained by using a wavefunction where electrons of different spins are placed in orbitals with different spatial parts. This is the basis of the UHF method,40 where two sets of singly occupied orbitals are constructed instead of the doubly occupied set. The drawback is of course that the UHF wavefunction is not a spin eigenfunction, and so does not represent a true spectroscopic state. There are two ways around the problem one can apply spin projection operators either before minimization or after. Both have their disadvantages, and the most common procedure is to apply a single spin annihilator after minimization,41 arguing that the most serious spin contaminant is the one of next higher multiplicity to the one of interest. 

Transform all the operators corresponding to the block such as the creation and annihilation operators, number operators, spin operators etc., to the basis of the m chosen eigenvectors. 

An approximate wavefunction may be a mixture of different spin states. Unwanted spin states can be removed with annihilation and projection operators. The annihilation operator that removes the state with spin k is... 

In the context of fra/u-polyacetylene cjia and c are, respectively, the creation and annihilation operators of an electron with spin projection a in the n-orbital of the nth carbon atom (n= l,...,N) that is perpendicular to the chain plane (see Fig. 3-3). Furthermore, u is the displacement along the chain of the nth CH unit from its position in the undimerized chain, P denotes the momentum of this unit, and M is its mass. 

The Brueckner-reference method discussed in Section 5.2 and the cc-pvqz basis set without g functions were applied to the vertical ionization energies of ozone [27]. Errors in the results of Table IV lie between 0.07 and 0.17 eV pole strengths (P) displayed beside the ionization energies are approximately equal to 0.9. Examination of cluster amplitudes amd elements of U vectors for each ionization energy reveals the reasons for the success of the present calculations. The cluster operator amplitude for the double excitation to 2bj from la is approximately 0.19. For each final state, the most important operator pertains to an occupied spin-orbital in the reference determinant, but there are significant coefficients for 2h-p operators. For the A2 case, a balanced description of ground state correlation requires inclusion of a 2p-h operator as well. The 2bi orbital s creation or annihilation operator is present in each of the 2h-p and 2p-h operators listed in Table IV. Pole strengths are approximately equal to the square of the principal h operator coefiScient and contributions by other h operators are relatively small. 

The existing SCF procedures are of two types in restricted methods, the MO s, except for the hipest (singly) occupied MO, are filled by two electrons with antiparallel spin, while in unrestricted methods, the variation procedure is performed with individual spin orbitals. In the latter, a total wave function is not an eigenvalue of the spin operator S, which is disadvantageous in many applications because of a necessary annihilation of higher multiplets by the projection operator. Since in practical applications the unrestricted methods have not proved to be remarkably superior, we shall call our attention in this review mainly to the restricted methods. 

Relations (44,45) describe the general form of the N-order condition However, some terms must be eliminated from relation (45) because they do not occur when the anticommutation/commutation operations are carried out explicitly. We call these terms spin — forbidden because in all of them the spin correspondence which should exist between the creator and the annihilators forming the p-RO (which generates the p-RDM) is not maintained. These spin-forbidden terms are those having a transposition of at least two indices in their p-RDM. For instance ... 

Table 3 Unrestricted Hartree-Fock energies (Hartrees) for Ceo and C70 and their muon adducts, muon in atomic units (and MHz) after quartet spin state annihilation. The value of the total spin operator, < >, is also given after quartet spin state...

Here, n denotes a number operator, a creation operator, c an annihilation operator, and 8 an energy. The first term with the label a describes the reactant, the second term describes the metal electrons, which are labeled by their quasi-momentum k, and the last term accounts for electron exchange between the reactant and the metal Vk is the corresponding matrix element. This part of the Hamiltonian is similar to that of the Anderson-Newns model [Anderson, 1961 Newns, 1969], but without spin. The neglect of spin is common in theories of outer sphere reactions, and is justified by the comparatively weak electronic interaction, which ensures that only one electron is transferred at a time. We shall consider spin when we treat catalytic reactions. 

Here the indices a and b stand for the valence orbitals on the two atoms as before, n is a number operator, c+ and c are creation and annihilation operators, and cr is the spin index. The third and fourth terms in the parentheses effect electron exchange and are responsible for the bonding between the two atoms, while the last two terms stand for the Coulomb repulsion between electrons of opposite spin on the same orbital. As is common in tight binding theory, we assume that the two orbitals a and b are orthogonal we shall correct for this neglect of overlap later. The coupling Vab can be taken as real we set Vab = P < 0. 

In this expression, cfaa is an operator representing the creation of an electron with spin ct(ct =t or J,) and orbital state a at site i, cirm is the corresponding annihilation operator, and the operator htrln = cltncirm appearing in... 

In Chapter 1 we have discussed the familiar realization of quantum mechanics in terms of differential operators acting on the space of functions (the Schrodinger wave function formulation, also called wave mechanics ). A different realization can be obtained by means of creation and annihilation operators, leading to an algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics, sometimes called matrix mechanics. For problems with no spin, the formulation is done in terms of boson creation, b (, and annihilation, ba, operators, satisfying the commutation relations... 

The first simplification in the TDAN model is to consider only a few electronic orbitals on the scattered atom. For many applications, it is sufficient to consider one only, that from which, or into which, an electron is transferred. Let the ket 10 > denote the spatial part of the orbital. When far from the surface, suppose its energy is So> let Uq be the Coulomb repulsion integral associated with the energy change when it is occupied by two electrons of opposite spin. In terms of creation and annihilation operators and Co for 0>, with ff( = aorfi)a spin index, that part ofJt which refers to the free atom is... 

Consider, furthermore, a (2i- - 1)-dimensional subspace of the Hilbert space with fixed 5. Then, according to Schwinger s theory of angular momentum [98], this discrete spin DoF can be represented by two bosonic oscillators described by creation and annihilation operators with commutation relations... 

To generate the spin-adapted matrix, we spin-adapt the products of one creation operator and one annihilation operator ... 

We discuss a lattice model where spin-up, spin-down electrons move on a one-dimensional lattice A of size A = r, so that dim = 2 . An annihilator for a spin-up electron on lattice site e A is denoted by a, and that for a spin-down electron by b. An arbitrary operator on can be written as a polynomial in the 2r annihilation and 2r creation operators. 

The structure of the parametric UA for the 4-RDM satisfies the fourth-order fermion relation (the expectation value of the commutator of four annihilator and four creator operators [26]) for any value of the parameter which is a basic and necessary A-representability condition. Also, the 4-RDM constructed in this way is symmetric for any value of On the other hand, the other A-representability conditions will be affected by this value. Hence it seems reasonable to optimize this parameter in such a way that at least one of these conditions is satisfied. Alcoba s working hypothesis [48] was the determination of the parameter value by imposing the trace condition to the 4-RDM. In order to test this working hypothesis, he constructed the 4-RDM for two states of the BeHa molecule in its linear form Dqo/,. The calculations were carried out with a minimal basis set formed by 14 Hartree-Fock spin orbitals belonging to three different symmetries. Thus orbitals 1, 2, and 3 are cr orbitals 4 and 5 are cr and orbitals 6 and 7 are degenerate % orbitals. The two states considered are the ground state, where... 

In our formalism [5-9] excitation operators play a central role. Let an orthonormal basis p of spin orbitals be given. This basis has usually a finite dimension d, but it should be chosen such that in the limit —> cxd it becomes complete (in the so-called first Sobolev space [10]). We start from creation and annihilation operators for the ij/p in the usual way, but we use a tensor notation, in which subscripts refer to annihilation and superscripts to creation ... 

Then one redehnes the annUiilahon operator u, for an occupied spin orbital as the hole creation operator b, and the creation operator a for an occupied spin orbital as the hole annihilation operator bi. The fermion operators for the virtual spin orbitals remain unchanged. 

For a two-electron system in 2m-dimensional spin-space orbital, with and denoting the fermionic annihilation and creation operators of single-particle states and 0) representing the vacuum state, a pure two-electron state ) can be written [57]... 

Thus, the annihilation operator completely removes the next higher spm state and delivers a wave function that is a pure 5 spin state. Note, however, that it is not a normalized wave function, since Cs < 1 (otherwise the original wave function would not have been spin contaminated). Normalization is simple in this case, since we have... 

In the usual formalism of quantum mechanics, the first quantization formalism, observables are represented by operators and the wave functions are normal functions. In the method of second quantization, the wave functions are also expressed in terms of operators. The formalism starts with the introduction of an abstract vector space, the Fock space. The basis vectors of the Fock space are occupation number vectors, with each vector defined by a set of occupation numbers (0 or 1 for fermions). An occupation number vector represents a Slater determinant with each occupation number giving the occupation of given spin orbital. Creation and annihilation operators that respectively adds and removes electrons are then introduced. Representations of usual operators are expressed in terms of the very same operators. 

The action of operator a reduces nj from 1 to 0 if spin orbital i is occupied and gives zero if spin orbital i is unoccupied. The operators aj are for that reason called electron annihilation operators. A special case of Eq. (1.15) is... 

---