Numerical profile

The bacterial strains constituting BC1 were isolated by spreading the culture onto LB agar plates (8). A photosynthetic bacterial strain was identified by sequence analysis of its 16S rRNA gene. The numerical profiles of the other isolated bacteria were tested using API 20E strips (Bio Merieux S. A, France). 

It is known that the regular boundary layer over a smooth surface turns out to be selfsimilar [380, 566], The velocity distributions stretching from the EPR interface z - 1 till the boundary layer border z = d2(x) were also inspected for such a property. It turns out that the numerical profiles of the longitudinal velocity can be brought together if... 

We present now numerical profiles obtained for surfaces with a constant potential... 

The numerical profiles of the previous section indicate that it may be possible to obtain simple analytical results for the PE adsorption by assuming that the adsorption is characterized by one dominant length scale D. Hence, we write the polymer order parameter profile in the form... 

We first discuss the case of constant surface potential, which can be directly compared to the numerical profiles. Then we note the differences with the constant surface charge boundary condition in which the interesting phenomenon of charge overcompensation is discussed in detail. 

One week after an intratracheal instillation of 0.5 ml suspension of 10 mg ZnO/ml saUne the size of rat pulmonary alveolar macrophages was considerably reduced (Migally et al. 1982). The cells contained a prominent nucleolus within an invaginated nucleus. Several types of lysosomes were considered to be primary, secondary, and residual bodies. Short profiles of rough endoplasmic reticulum, small dense mitochondria and numerous profiles of Golgi membranes were also noted. 

Keywords— Numerical profile, graph, prosthetic foot. 

Fig. 5 The laboratory prototype prosthetic foot design that is daived from the proposed numerical profile...

Fig. 9.11 Experimental and numerical profiles of two-dimensional PVP-water sprays in air at the cross-section of 0.12 m distance from the nozzle exit, fhj j = 120 kg/h (Reprinted with permission fi-om [42] 2014, Begellhouse)... 

In order to provide further evidence on the results discussed above, the gas flow now is fully coupled to the spray equations. Figure 9.14 shows a comparison of the experimental and numerical profiles of the axial droplet velocity for the PVP-water spray with 10 % PVP mass fraction and an injection pressure of 25 bar at the cross-section of 120 mm after the nozzle exit. The figure shows both the numerical simulations without and with coupling of the DQMOM to the gas phase Eqs. (9.27)-(9.30). It can be observed that the results are greatly improved by resolving the gas phase. However, at the periphery of the spray the computed axial droplet velocity differs stiU about 3 m/s from the experimental results. This is explained by inconsistent boundary conditions the simulations correspond to a confined jet while the experiments represent a free jet. Moreover, at the spray periphery, the experimental error is larger than in the spray center. 

The measured pressure profiles are compared quantitatively with numerical solutions of the isodiermal EHL point contact problem. The good agreement obtained allows a validation of both the measurement method and the experimental set-up. Discrepancies between the experimental and the numerical profiles observed at high rolling speeds are attributed to inlet shear heating of the lubricant. The corresponding temperature rise is estimated. The evolution of the film thickness with speed is studied and the transition from isothermal to thermal regime is pointed out. 

On the basis of longitudinal profiles, quantitative comparisons between experimental and numerical results are proposed. In Figure 4 and Figure 5 the experimental pressure profiles measured for various loads and speeds at temperature of 50°C and 25 C are compared to the numerical profiles calculated for the corresponding M and L parameter. The dimensionless pressure P is shown as a function of the dimensionless position X along the centre line of the contact (Y=0) in the longitudinal direction. To make comparison easier, all the profiles are at the same scale. 

The experimental and the numerical profiles show the same evolution with load and speed as die load is increased or as the speed is decreased, the... 

For high speeds (u =2 m/s at 50 C, Figures 4g to 4i and Ue=0.2 m/s at 25°C, Figure Sc), significant discrepancies are observed between the experimental and the numerical profiles. The measured pressures are lower than Ae calculated ones and the pressure spike position is shifted toward the exit of the contact. 

In order to verify if the discrepancies between experimental and numerical pressure profiles are really due to inlet shear heating, new isothermal solutions have been computed for the same loads and speeds but for higher inlet temperatures of the lubricant. The numerical profiles calculated for a load of 17 N, a speed of 2 m/s and for four different temperatures of 5P4E (50°C, 55°C, 60 C and 65 C) are compared in Figure 6 to the corresponding experimental profile measured for a temperature in the reservoir of 50°C. The profile calculated for a temperature of 55°C is above the experimental... 

Figure 6. Comparison of the experimental central line pressures measured for w=17N and Ue=2m/s widi the numerical profiles calculated for various inlet temperatures (T=50 C in the resCTvoir).

---