Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Numerical methods issues

Problem Selection. To select the problem correcdy, the criteria discussed earHer should be carefully appHed before launching a project the existence of a knowledge bottleneck, the inappHcabiHty of exact numerical methods, the existence of either an expert or a theory for the task, the narrowness of the domain, and the business issues of payout and cost. If needed, the various criteria can be quantified and weighted based on their... [Pg.537]

Some preliminary information on economical schemes. One of the most important issues in numerical methods is the well-founded choice of economical computational algorithms, the realization of which requires a min-... [Pg.543]

The chemical bonding and the possible existence of non-nuclear maxima (NNM) in the EDDs of simple metals has recently been much debated [13,27-31]. The question of NNM in simple metals is a diverse topic, and the research on the topic has basically addressed three issues. First, what are the topological features of simple metals This question is interesting from a purely mathematical point of view because the number and types of critical points in the EDD have to satisfy the constraints of the crystal symmetry [32], In the case of the hexagonal-close-packed (hep) structure, a critical point network has not yet been theoretically established [28]. The second topic of interest is that if NNM exist in metals what do they mean, and are they important for the physical properties of the material The third and most heavily debated issue is about numerical methods used in the experimental determination of EDDs from Bragg X-ray diffraction data. It is in this respect that the presence of NNM in metals has been intimately tied to the reliability of MEM densities. [Pg.40]

The numerical methods for partial differential equations can be classified according to the type of equation (see Partial Differential Equations ) parabolic, elliptic, and hyperbolic. This section uses the finite difference method to illustrate the ideas, and these results can be programmed for simple problems. For more complicated problems, though, it is common to rely on computer packages. Thus, some discussion is given to the issues that arise when using computer packages. [Pg.54]

The successful numerical solution of differential equations requires attention to two issues associated with error control through time step selection. One is accuracy and the other is stability. Accuracy requires a time step that is sufficiently small so that the numerical solution is close to the true solution. Numerical methods usually measure the accuracy in terms of the local truncation error, which depends on the details of the method and the time step. Stability requires a time step that is sufficiently small that numerical errors are damped, and not amplified. A problem is called stiff when the time step required to maintain stability is much smaller than that that would be required to deliver accuracy, if stability were not an issue. Generally speaking, implicit methods have very much better stability properties than explicit methods, and thus are much better suited to solving stiff problems. Since most chemical kinetic problems are stiff, implicit methods are usually the method of choice. [Pg.619]

Owen S.J., Shephard M.S., 2003. Trends in unstructured mesh generation. Special Issue, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 58(2). [Pg.92]

The chapter is organized as follows The quantum-classical Liouville dynamics scheme is first outlined and a rigorous surface hopping trajectory algorithm for its implementation is presented. The iterative linearized density matrix propagation approach is then described and an approach for its implementation is presented. In the Model Simulations section the comparable performance of the two methods is documented for the generalized spin-boson model and numerical convergence issues are mentioned. In the Conclusions we review the perspectives of this study. [Pg.417]

In the last 25 years, with continuous development of faster computers and sophisticated numerical methods, there have been many published work that have used detailed mathematical models with rigorous physical property calculations and advanced optimisation techniques to address all the issues mentioned above. These have been the motivating factors to write this book in which excellent and important contributions of many researchers around the globe and those by the author and coworkers are accommodated. [Pg.404]

For linear systems, the differential equation for the jth cumulant function is linear and it involves terms up to the jth cumulant. The same procedure will be followed subsequently with other models to obtain analogous differential equations, which will be solved numerically if analytical solutions are not tractable. Historically, numerical methods were used to construct solutions to the master equations, but these solutions have pitfalls that include the need to approximate higher-order moments as a product of lower moments, and convergence issues [383]. What was needed was a general method that would solve this sort of problem, and that came with the stochastic simulation algorithm. [Pg.267]

There is also the issue of which numerical method should be used for drug comparison investigations. This has been well studied for heroin, but the arena is wide open for analysis and numerical comparison of Cannabis and its products, cocaine, amphetamines, tryptamines and other synthetic or semi-synthetic drugs. How these methods should be reported has still not been fully explored. [Pg.154]

The issue of goodness-of-fif with nonlinear regression is not straightforward. Numerous methods can be used to explore the goodness-of-fif of the model to the data (e.g., residual analysis, variance analysis, and Chi-squared analysis). It is always a good idea to inspect the plot of the predicted [y(x,)] versus observed y, values to watch for systematic deviations. Additionally, some analytical measure for goodness-of-fit should also be employed. [Pg.348]

QMC methods (type III) involve a direct numerical solution of the Schrodinger equation, subject to restrictions associated with the placement of nodes in nontrivial multielectron systems. Hence, they potentially provide an exact treatment of PJT effects, just as they provide a potentially exact treatment of all other molecular properties. However, there seems to have been very little work done in using QMC to study problems involving potential energy surfaces of radicals, possibly because of the numerical uncertainty issues associated with these calculations. Nevertheless, the potential for such applications is vast, and we encourage the QMC community to explore this challenging and important area of application. [Pg.133]

Numerous methods have been developed for assessing the concentrations of FT4 and FT3 in serum. These methods include direct assays that currently serve as reference methods and indirect assays that are more widely available for general laboratory use. The following section describes the principles of these methods and offers some guidelines for their use. The theoretical basis, analytical validity, and clinical utility of these methods have been discussed. Special reports from the Nomenclature Committee of the American Thyroid Association, the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry, and the NCCLS also review some of the issues and concerns regarding free thyroid hormone measurements. [Pg.2074]

The standard Euler methods and Runge-Kutta methods do not converge for stiff ODE S. A still system can be defined as one in which the stability of the numerical methods used becomes an issue. Maple has an inbuilt stiff solver. [Pg.107]

In one point of view, as expressed by Reynolds [128], the two issues are considered separately. The filtering and modeling are independent of the numerical method, and the closures are independent of the numerical grid used. Hence, the terms filtered and residual are more appropriate than the usual resolved and sub-grid phrases. In this case it is also expected that the numerical method provides accurate solutions to the filtered equations. In practice, however, the modeling and numerical issues are always connected. [Pg.166]


See other pages where Numerical methods issues is mentioned: [Pg.785]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.990]    [Pg.991]    [Pg.1095]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.401]   


SEARCH



Method numerical

Numerical Issues

© 2024 chempedia.info