Numerical methods interpolation

Finlayson and Olson (1987) used the Galerkin finite element numerical method to explore heat transfer to spheres at low to intermediate Reynolds numbers (1 < Re < 100) and for Prandtl numbers in the range 0.001-1,000. They found that the best correlation of their data was an interpolation formula of the form proposed by Zhang and Davis their correlation is... 

As it will be discussed, while three maxima of the first derivative are observed, the second one is a consequence of the applied numerical method. Using the second derivative values in the last column, local inverse linear interpolation gives V = 3.74 ml and V = 7.13 ml for the two equivalence points. We will see later on how the false end point can be eliminated. 

Numerical analysis is important in digital-computer work from another viewpoint. Sometimes it is necessary to express complex functional relationships in a simpler form. Occasionally relationships may be given in a graphical or tabular form not directly suitable for processing on digital equipment. In these situations numerical methods for curve fitting and interpolation are techniques which will necessarily be employed. 

O.A. Estrada, I.D. Lopez-Gomez, C. Roldan, M. del P. Noriega, W.F. Florez, and T.A. Osswald. Numerical simulation of non-isothermal flow of non-newtonian incompressible fluids, considering viscous dissipation and inertia effects, using radial basis function interpolation. Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow, 2005. 

The numerical Method of Lines as implemented in the routine NDSolve of the Mathematica system deals with system (32) by employing the default fourth order finite difference discretization in the spatial variable Z, and creating a much larger coupled system of ordinnary equations for the transformed dimensionless temperature evaluated on the knots of the created mesh. This resulting system is internally solved (still inside NDSolve routine) with Gear s method for stiff ODE systems. Once numerical results have been obtained and automatically interpolated by NDSolve, one can apply the inverse expression (31.b) to obtain the full dimensionless temperature field. 

Velocity and other variables at cell faces can be obtained by employing suitable interpolation practices. Numerous alternative interpolation methods have been developed. Generically, a value of general variable 0 at the cell face can be expressed in terms of two neighboring nodes and one additional upstream node (the need to include an additional upstream node is discussed later in this chapter). For example, the value of 0 at cell face e can be written ... 

When deriving these expressions, it was assumed that velocity at all the cell faces is positive. In other cases, suitable modifications to include appropriate upstream nodes (in place of 0ww and 0ss) should be made. It can be seen that the continuity equation indicates that the last term inside the bracket of Eq. (6.19) will always be zero for constant density flows. The behavior of numerical methods depends on the source term linearization employed and interpolation practices. Before these practices are discussed, a brief discussion of the desired characteristics of discretization methods will be useful. The most important properties of the discretization method are ... 

Numerical methods include those based on finite difference calculus. They are ideally suited for tabulated experimental data such as one finds in thermodynamic tables. They also include methods of solving simultaneous linear equations, curve fitting, numerical solution of ordinary and partial differential equations and matrix operations. In this appendix, numerical interpolation, integration, and differentiation are considered. Information about the other topics is available in monographs by Hornbeck [2] and Lanczos [3]. 

There are many ways one can try to reduce the computational burden. Ideally, one would find numerical methods which are guaranteed to retain accuracy while speeding the calculations, and it would be best if the procedure were completely automatic i.e. it did not rely on the user to provide any special information to the numerical routine. Unfortunately, often one is driven to make physical approximations in order to make it feasible to reach a solution. Common approximations of this type are the quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA), the use of reduced chemical kinetic models, and interpolation between tabulated solutions of the differential equations (Chen, 1988 Peters and Rogg, 1993 Pope, 1997 Tonse et al., 1999). All of these methods were used effectively in the 20th century for particular cases, but all of these approximated-chemistry methods share a serious problem it is hard to know how much error is... 

In this chapter we will encounter a number of standard mathematical operations that are conveniently performed and/or illustrated on a spreadsheet. We start with a brief description of the logic underlying the Goal Seek and Solver methods of Excel. Then we consider two methods often encountered in spectroscopy, viz. signal averaging and lock-in amplification. Subsequently the focus shifts toward numerical methods, such as peak fitting, integration, differentiation, and interpolation, some of which we have already encountered in one form or another in the context of least squares analysis and/or Fourier transformation. Finally we describe some matrix operations that are easy to perform with Excel. 

One numerical method for solving such a problem is called interpolation regula falsi (see Probs. 1-7 and 1-8). This method consists of the linear interpolation between the most recent pair of points (7> , Sn) and (TF n+l, <5n+1) by use of the following formula... 

Based on the finite volume method, the control equation can be converted to a numerical method for solving algebraic equations. Convection of equation use second-order upwind difference during the discrete process, the solver is based on the pressure, the pressure-velocity coupling adopt the SIMPLE algorithm, pressure interpolation scheme use PRESTO Format. 

Numerical methods for interpolating between data points or over data point intervals are often better, since no a priori assumptions are made. There is a very wide variety of interpolation methods available, such as cubic splines, which guarantee continuity and differentiability of the interpolated data. Some programs, such as Mathematica , have a wide variety of such menus built into their powerful data handling and representation algorithms. 

Alves, M. A., Oliveira, P. J., Pinho, F. T. (2003). A convergent and universally bounded interpolation scheme for the treatment of advection. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 41( ), 47-75. 

As expected, both methods here give identical results. In both cases the matrix elements Hij were interpolated by cubic splines in the first step and we determined the C matrix by diagonalization at all distances required by the three-point numerical differentiation. Interpolation of the rotation matrix C leads to numerical instability due to the loss of unitarity and should be avoided. It was demonstrated that the evaluation of the radial coupling is more stable and preferred by the Hellman-Feynman method. 

Notice that the lack of specificity of the periodic law as then conceived does not entail that Mendeleev failed to operate in a precise way locally. For example, he himself gave a clear account of his approach to working out some of the main relationships between the properties of the elements in his textbook The Principles of Chemistry. The method consists of simultaneous interpolation within groups or columns as well as within periods or rows of the periodic table. The average of the values of the numerical properties of the four elements flanking the element in question are taken to determine the latter s properties. So Mendeleev wrote ... 

One may adopt higher order polynomials, such as biquadratic polynomial [30], but the methods are conceptually the same. Theoretically, the numerical accuracy corresponding to higher order interpolations is expected to be improved, but computation practices show this is not always true. As a matter of fact, when the grid becomes very fine, there is little difference between the results from different orders of interpolation. 

Concerning the numerical accuracy, the closed form solutions of normal surface deformation have been compared to the numerical results calculated through the three methods of DS, DC-FFT, and MLMI. The influence coefficients used in the numerical analyses were obtained from three different schemes Green function, piecewise constant function, and bilinear interpolation. The relative errors, as defined in Eq (39), are given in Table 2 while Fig. 4 provides an illustration of the data. 

Figure 2.16. Depiction of the standard addition method extrapolation (left), interpolation (right). The data and the numerical results are given in the following example.

---