Nuclear fuel , spent beginnings

Deficiencies in the Radioactive Waste Classification System. The classification system for radioactive waste in the United States summarized in Table 1.1 is based primarily on the earliest descriptions of different classes of waste that arises from chemical reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel and subsequent processing of nuclear materials that were developed beginning in the late 1950s. These wastes were considered to be the most important in regard to potential radiological impacts on workers. 

Upon contact between the spent nuclear fuel and the groundwater, radiolysis of water will begin. From the point of view of a safety assessment it is relevant to define the worst-case, but still realistic, scenario. Hence, the maximum possible dissolution rate for the UOj fuel matrix (assuming congruent dissolution) must be defined. As shown above, oxidation of U(IV) to U(VI) is required for dissolution to occur. Consequently, the rate of dissolution can never exceed the rate of oxidation and the rate of oxidation can be used to estimate the maximum dissolution rate. It has also been shown that, for longer irradiation times, the only oxidant that must be taken into account is H2O2 and that the surface concentration of H2O2 approaches the steady-state concentration fairly rapidly. The concentration will never exceed the steady-state concentration and therefore we can use the steady-state approach to make a realistic estimate of the maximum dissolution rate. 

The nuclear fuel cycle describes the sequence of activities beginning with the mining of uranium ore, to the fabrication of nuclear fuel and its use in power plants, to reprocessing of the spent fuel for reuse, or its disposal in a geologic repository (cf. Berlin and Stanton 1989). 

Second bottleneck lies in the transportation capacity fuel elements that have been unloaded stay for many years in pools or in containers stored in the open air by want of transportation capacity. Those de facto intermediate storage lack the safety environment that would have been asked for if they had been conceived from the beginning as storage facilities they also lack correct physical protection and -though spent fuel from submarine is not the easiest way to a nuclear weapon - could thus attract the attention of terrorist organizations. 

This technology must not only solve problems related to waste produced but from the beginning of development, deal with the potential for accumulated radioactive waste and spent fuel. For a structure meeting these requirements, the concept of a three-component nuclear power system with closed U-Pu (Th-U) fuel cycle is currently being developed [XXI-5, XXI-6, and XXI-7], Fig. XXI-3. 

At present, only the most probable options of BMN-170 operation were considered in detail, at the beginning of its implementation in the structure of the nuclear power system when there are considerable reserves of spent fuel from light water reactors after decay in storage. 

In addition, the federal government is committed to begin accepting spent fuel in the late 1990s and is planning to provide away-from-reactor storage that may also include a fuel rod consolidation facility. As is usual for all new nuclear operations, the site and the schedule for this facility will depend on public acceptance. 

---