Nozzle-based function

We may generate a comparison between the modified liquid-flow model and the nozzle-based model by taking out the factor, C VPiAi from both equation (9.59) and equation (9.34). The modified liquid-flow function, fun, emerges as ... 

A4.3) reducing to the choked gas equation (9.2). But while the FUGSE will be valid at either end of the range of pressure ratios, the fact that the sine function joins the extremes in a conveniently smooth manner does not guarantee that the formula will be accurate at intermediate values. This appendix examines how closely the FUGSE matches direct data and the nozzle-based method for calculating control valve gas flow. 

Ejector Performance The performance of any ejec tor is a function of the area of the motive-gas nozzle and venturi throat, pressure of the motive gas, suction and discharge pressures, and ratios of specific heats, molecular weights, and temperatures. Figure 10-102, based on the assumption of constant-area mixing, is useful in evaluating single-stage-ejector performance for compression ratios up to 10 and area ratios up to 100 (see Fig. 10-103 for notation). 

The flow of fluids is most commonly measured using head flowmeters. The operation of these flowmeters is based on the Bernoulli equation. A constriction in the flow path is used to increase the flow velocity. This is accompanied by a decrease in pressure head and since the resultant pressure drop is a function of the flow rate of fluid, the latter can be evaluated. The flowmeters for closed conduits can be used for both gases and liquids. The flowmeters for open conduits can only be used for liquids. Head flowmeters include orifice and venturi meters, flow nozzles, Pitot tubes and weirs. They consist of a primary element which causes the pressure or head loss and a secondary element which measures it. The primary element does not contain any moving parts. The most common secondary elements for closed conduit flowmeters are U-tube manometers and differential pressure transducers. 

The first task was to produce carriers from different recipes and in different shapes as shown schematically in Fig. 8. The raw materials diatomaceous earth, water and various binders are mixed to a paste, which is subsequently extruded through a shaped nozzle and cut off to wet pellets. The wet pellets are finally dried and heated in a furnace in an oxidising atmosphere (calcination). The nozzle geometry determines the cross section of the pellet (cf. Fig. 3) and the pellet length is controlled by adjusting the cut-off device. Important parameters in the extrusion process are the dry matter content and the viscosity of the paste. The pore volume distribution of the carriers is measured by Hg porosimetry, in which the penetration of Hg into the pores of the carrier is measured as a function of applied pressure, and the surface area is measured by the BET method, which is based on adsorption of nitrogen on the carrier surface [1]. 

L = actual depth of methanator bed in ft plus 3 ft more added on to account for AP due to nozzles, distributor, and supports e = voidage (fractional free volume of packing) = 0.40 for this case h = exponent = a function of the Reynolds number = 2.0 for this case D = average catalyst particle diameter, ft = 0.0238 ft for this case gc = dimensional constant = 32.17 (lb mass) (ft)/(lb forceXs2) p = fluid density, lb/ft3, based on average temperature and entering pressure = 0.464 lb/ft3 for this case (j)s = shape factor for the solid catalyst particles = 1.0 for this case... 

In HTS, the dispensing function stands for a repetitive unidirectional transport of equal volume aliquots from one (or a few) reservoirs to a series of wells in a plate. Dispensers enable the contact-free transfer of assay reagents and biological materials without immersion of the dispensing nozzle into the liquid in the target well. Contact-free dispensing is based on a fast ejection of a liquid jet through a nozzle... 

Park et al. [68] derived 24.7.ix for duplex swirl nozzles. It is very similar to 24.5.i-24.5.iii however it does not contain any effect of liquid mass flow rate. The formula was derived based on variations in temperature only, which caused the liquid properties to change independent changes were not applied. The correlation indicates that surface tension has a much smaller impact on SMD in duplex nozzles than simplex nozzle. It also shows that the viscosity plays a much larger role in the atomization process, while the effect of the injection pressure is the same as in simplex nozzles. Figure 24.45 plots this equation as a function of viscosity and injection pressure at various surface tensions, using AP = 300 kPa and mass flow rate = 50 g/s. As expected, an increase in injection pressure leads to a decrease in SMD, and an increase in viscosity leads to an increase in SMD. 

---