Non Random Two Liquids NRTL

Renon used the concept of local composition to develop a non-random, two-liquid (NRTL) three parameter (al2, tp, ti() equations given below (Prausnitz et al., 1986). 

About the same time Beutier and Renon (11) also proposed a similar model for the representation of the equilibria in aqueous solutions of weak electrolytes. The vapor was assumed to be an ideal gas and < >a was set equal to unity. Pitzer s method was used for the estimation of the activity coefficients, but, in contrast to Edwards et al. (j)), two ternary parameters in the activity coefficient expression were employed. These were obtained from data on the two-solute systems It was found that the equilibria in the systems NH3+ H2S+H20, NH3+C02+H20 and NH3+S02+H20 could be represented very well up to high concentrations of the ionic species. However, the model was unreliable at high concentrations of undissociated ammonia. Edwards et al. (1 2) have recently proposed a new expression for the representation of the activity coefficients in the NH3+H20 system, over the complete concentration range from pure water to pure NH3. it appears that this area will assume increasing importance and that one must be able to represent activity coefficients in the region of high concentrations of molecular species as well as in dilute solutions. Cruz and Renon (13) have proposed an expression which combines the equations for electrolytes with the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) model for non-electrolytes in order to represent the complete composition range. In a later publication, Cruz and Renon (J4J, this model was applied to the acetic acid-water system. 

The LCM is a semi-theoretical model with a minimum number of adjustable parameters and is based on the Non-Random Two Liquid (NRTL) model for nonelectrolytes (20). The LCM does not have the inherent drawbacks of virial-expansion type equations as the modified Pitzer, and it proved to be more accurate than the Bromley method. Some advantages of the LCM are that the binary parameters are well defined, have weak temperature dependence, and can be regressed from various thermodynamic data sources. Additionally, the LCM does not require ion-pair equilibria to correct for activity coefficient prediction at higher ionic strengths. Thus, the LCM avoids defining, and ultimately solving, ion-pair activity coefficients and equilibrium expressions necessary in the Davies technique. Overall, the LCM appears to be the most suitable activity coefficient technique for aqueous solutions used in FGD hence, a data base and methods to use the LCM were developed. 

The development of equations that successfully predict multicomponent phase equilibrium data from binary data with remarkable accuracy for engineering purposes not only improves the accuracy of tray-to-tray calculations but also lessens the amount of experimentation required to establish the phase equilibrium data. Such equations are the Wilson equation (13), the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) equation (14), and the local effective mole fractions (LEMF) equation (15, 16), a two-parameter version of the basically three-parameter NRTL equation. Larson and Tassios (17) showed that the Wilson and NRTL equations predict accurately ternary activity coefficients from binary data Hankin-son et al. (18) demonstrated that the Wilson equation predicts accurately... 

The Wilson Equation and the Non-Random Two-Liquid (NRTL) Equation... 

The non-random, two-liquid (NRTL) equation proposed by Renon and Prausnitz (8) seems to predict successfully multicomponent (ternary) mixtures of alcohols and water. The alcohols studied in this work ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-methyl-l-propanol, and 3-methyl-l-butanol, which occur from the fermentation of sugar solutions, show highly non-ideal behavior in aqueous solutions and present a severe test of the effectiveness of any prediction method. 

Another attempt to relate the results from the use of a solvatochromic probe (Phenol Blue (66)) to the inherent properties of solvent mixtures was made by Phillips and Brennecke122. They obtained the interaction energies (required for the application of the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) approach) of 66 with each of the solvent components from its solubility in the neat solvent. The mixtures studied contained cyclohexane as one component and acetone, triethylamine, ethyl butyrate, cyclohexanone, toluene and acetophenone as the other. Then the local compositions deduced from the solvatochromism of 66 were compared with those calculated by the NRTL equation and reasonable agreement was found. 

In the Non-Random-Two-Liquid (NRTL) model of Renon and Prausnitz (1968), the molar excess Gibbs free energy for a binary mixture is given as... 

Figure 6.10 shows activity coefficient derivatives over the whole composition range for experiment from three correlations and the Verlet method. A procedure for experimental data analysis was described by Wooley and O Connell (1991), in which one extracts the isothermal compressibility, partial molar volumes, and activity coefficient derivatives from experimental data. The activity coefficient derivatives are obtained by fitting mixture vapor-liquid equilibrium data to obtain parameters for at least two different models. Wooley and O Connell employed the Wilson, non-random, two liquid (NRTL) and modified Margules (mM) models. Partial molar volumes are obtained from correlations of mixture densities (Handa and Benson 1979). Isothermal compressibilities are either taken from measurements or estimated with... 

The vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLB) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) correlations in Aspen Plus are not always as accurate as possible. This can cause significant errors, particularly near pinch points in distillation columns. If data is available, Aspen Plus will find values of the parameters for any of the VLB or LLE correlations by doing a regression against the data you input. This is illustrated to obtain an improved fit for the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) VLB correlation for the binary system water and isopropanol (IPA). VLB data for water and isopropanol is listed in Table B-1. This system has a minimum boiling azeotrope at 80.46°C. The Aspen Plus fit to the data with NRTL is not terrible, but can be improved. 

Nonelectrolyte G mcxlels only account for the short-range interaction among non-charged molecules (—One widely used G model is the Non-Random-Two-Liquid (NRTL) theory developed in 1968. To extend this to electrolyte solutions, it was combined with either the DH or the MSA theory to explicitly account for the Coulomb forces among the ions. Examples for electrolyte models are the electrolyte NRTL (eNRTL) [4] or the Pitzer model [5] which both include the Debye-Hiickel theory. Nasirzadeh et al. [6] used a MSA-NRTL model [7] (combination of NRTL with MSA) as well as an extended Pitzer model of Archer [8] which are excellent models for the description of activity coefficients in electrolyte solutions. Examples for electrolyte G models which were applied to solutions with more than one solvent or more than one solute are a modified Pitzer approach by Ye et al. [9] or the MSA-NRTL by Papaiconomou et al. [7]. However, both groups applied ternary mixture parameters to correlate activity coefficients. Salimi et al. [10] defined concentration-dependent and salt-dependent ion parameters which allows for correlations only but not for predictions or extrapolations. 

J A Note on Application of Non-random Two-liquid (NRTL) Model... 

There are various liquid activity models available including Margules, van Laar, Wilson, non-random two-liquid (NRTL), and universal quasi-chemical (UNIQUAC) models. Mixing rules are used for mixtures to combine pure component parameters. 

Select a suitable fluid package by clicking on Fluid Pkgs tab in this case, the Non-Random Two-Liquid, NRTL is the most suitable fluid package. Close the fluid package window. 

For the ethanol production process (including the CHP), the non-random two liquid (NRTL) property method with Henry components was used, which was also recommended by the Aspen Plus guidelines, as it is suitable for, among others, liquid-phase reactions and azeotropic alcohol separation. Some compounds involved in the ethanol production do not exist in the conventional Aspen Plus database. Therefore, physical properties of these components were taken from a database developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) for biofuel components (Wooley et al., 1999 Aspentech, 2011). 

---