Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Non-compact groups

Dothan, Y., Gell-Mann, M., and Ne eman, Y. (1965), Series of Hadron Energy Levels as Representations of Non-Compact Groups, Phys. Lett. 17, 148. [Pg.225]

Finite-additive invariant measures on non-compact groups were studied by Birkhoff (1936) (see also the book of Hewitt and Ross, 1963, Chapter 4). The frequency-based Mises approach to probability theory foundations (von Mises, 1964), as well as logical foundations of probability by Carnap (1950) do not need cr-additivity. Non-Kolmogorov probability theories are discussed now in the context of quantum physics (Khrennikov, 2002), nonstandard analysis (Loeb, 1975) and many other problems (and we do not pretend provide here is a full review of related works). [Pg.109]

This construction works even in the case X = C. Although is non-compact, we also have an appropriate analytical package, i.e. the weighted Sobolev space (see e.g., [61] for detail). In this case, we must consider the framed moduli space, which means that we take a quotient by a group of gauge transformations converging to the identity at the end of X. In other words, if we consider the one point compactification U oo, then... [Pg.38]

Substantial mathematical difficulties arise because the group action p is only strongly continuous. Moreover the group SE 2) is non-compact due to its translational component. We suppress these technicalities in the following. [Pg.77]

More explicit representations for M are described below. Here we note that the matrices M are, in general, not unitary. The Lorentz group is non-compact and hence has no finite-dimensional unitary representations. An exception is the subgroup of rotations, which is compact, and matrices M representing rotations are indeed unitary. [Pg.55]

As the boosts constitute the non-compact part of the Lorentz group, the corresponding matrices M = " which act on the spinor-components are... [Pg.58]

Proteins can be classified into two main groups on the basis of their water solubility. These are the insoluble fibrous proteins above, and the soluble globular proteins. The latter contain polypeptide chains which are folded into a compact structure of globular shape. This class of proteins is considerably more complex than the fibrous variety. They tend to expose a maximum number of their polar (amino acid) groups to the external aqueous environment, and at the same time orient a maximum number of their non-polar groups internally. Fibrous proteins are rich in the latter and these are oriented externally. [Pg.860]

Proteins derive their powerful and diverse capacity for molecular recognition and catalysis from their ability to fold into defined secondary and tertiary structures and display specific functional groups at precise locations in space. Functional protein domains are typically 50-200 residues in length and utilize a specific sequence of side chains to encode folded structures that have a compact hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic surface. Mimicry of protein structure and function by non-natural ohgomers such as peptoids wiU not only require the synthesis of >50mers with a variety of side chains, but wiU also require these non-natural sequences to adopt, in water, tertiary structures that are rich in secondary structure. [Pg.18]

The same effect is seen when a non—aromatic cationic surfactant/nonionic surfactant system is used. Since the nonideality of mixed micelle formation in this case is due almost entirely to the electrostatic effects and not to any specific interactions between the dissimilar hydrophilic groups, the geometrical effect just discussed will cause the EO groups to be less compactly structured... [Pg.17]

The projective plane arises as a quotient space of the sphere, the required group being C,-. It is obtained by identifying antipodal points of the spherical surface in other words, it is the antipodal quotient of the sphere (see Section 1.2.2). P2 is the simplest compact non-orientable surface in the sense that it can be obtained from the sphere by adding just one cross-cap. [Pg.41]

Three different ways have been developed to produce nanoparticle of PE-surfs. The most simple one is the mixing of polyelectrolytes and surfactants in non-stoichiometric quantities. An example for this is the complexation of poly(ethylene imine) with dodecanoic acid (PEI-C12). It forms a solid-state complex that is water-insoluble when the number of complexable amino functions is equal to the number of carboxylic acid groups [128]. Its structure is smectic A-like. The same complex forms nanoparticles when the polymer is used in an excess of 50% [129]. The particles exhibit hydrodynamic diameters in the range of 80-150 nm, which depend on the preparation conditions, i.e., the particle formation is kinetically controlled. Each particle consists of a relatively compact core surrounded by a diffuse corona. PEI-C12 forms the core, while non-complexed PEI acts as a cationic-active dispersing agent. It was found that the nanoparticles show high zeta potentials (approximate to +40 mV) and are stable in NaCl solutions at concentrations of up to 0.3 mol l-1. The stabilization of the nanoparticles results from a combination of ionic and steric contributions. A variation of the pH value was used to activate the dissolution of the particles. [Pg.136]


See other pages where Non-compact groups is mentioned: [Pg.168]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.830]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.100 ]




SEARCH



Group compact

© 2024 chempedia.info