Nitrosamine analysis, chemiluminescent

Chemiluminescent Detectors (Thermal Energy Analyzers) in Nitrosamine Analysis... 

The classical nitrosamine analysis was performed for many years by gas chromatography using a thermal energy analyzer (TEA) as detector. This special TEA detector was used due to its selectivity for nitrosamines based on the specific chemiluminescent reaction of ozone with the detector generated NO from nitrosamines. Today, with increased sensitivity requirements, the detection limits of the TEA, and also its complex operation, do not comply any more with the required needs for low detection limits and sample throughput. Mass spectrometric methods have increasingly replaced the TEA. 

The efficient recovery of volatile nitrosamines from frankfurters, followed by gc with chemiluminescence detection, has been described (133). Recoveries ranged from 84.3 to 104.8% for samples spiked at the 20 ppb level. Methods for herbicide residues and other contaminants that may also relate to food have been discussed. Inorganic elements in food can be deterrnined by atomic absorption (AA) methods. These methods have been extensively reviewed. Table 8 Hsts methods for the analysis of elements in foods (134). 

Rouse, C. A., J.C. Cunningham, and C.R. Taylor Jr Analysis of tobacco-specific A-nitrosamines in mainstream smoke by supercritical fluid extraction/gas chroma-tography/chemiluminescence detection 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 50, 1999, pp. 47-A8. 3359. 

A sensitive and selective chemiluminescent detector that has made an appreciable impact on the analysis of nitrosamines in environmental samples in the last several years is the thermal energy analyzer or (TEA) (15-19). This detector utilizes an initial pyrolysis reaction that cleaves nitrosamines at the N-NO bond to produce nitric oxide. Although earlier instrumentation involved the use of a catalytic pyrolysis chamber (15,17,19), in current instruments, pyrolysis takes place in a heated quartz tube without a catalyst (20). The nitric oxide is then detected by its chemiluminescent ion react with ozone. The sequence of reactions can be depicted in Figure 1. A schematic of the TEA is shown in Figure 2 (17). Samples are introduced into the pyrolysis chamber by direct injection or by interfacing the detector with a gas chromatograph (15,17,21,22) or a liquid chromatograph (22-25). 

While the chemiluminescence detectors have considerable selectivity for nitrosamines it must also be recognized that the possibility exists that any compound that can produce NO during pyrolysis will produce a signal (20). For example, TEA responses have been observed from organic nitrites, C-nitro and C-nitroso compounds (17,28) and nitramines (29). In the routine analysis of N-nitroso compounds, possible TEA analyzer responses to compounds other than N-nitroso derivatives normally do not represent a problem since the the identity of a compound can be readily established by co-elution with known standards on GC-TEA and/or HPLC-TEA systems (30-34). Additional confirmation could be provided when the sample can be chromatographed on both GC-TEA and HPLC-TEA (30,33). The technique accepted as the most reliable for the confirmation of N-nitrosamines is based on mass spectrometry (22, 35,36). Low-resolution mass spectrometry is satisfactory for the analysis of relatively simple mixtures and in those instances in which extensive clean-up of samples has been performed. However, complex samples require more sophisticated GC and MS procedures (e.g., high resolution-MS). 

---