Multiblock polymers, properties

The sequence of curves in Figures 5-11 shows the stages of partial phase separation that occur in an amorphous multiblock polymer with polydisperse hard blocks. By systematically varying the block molecular weights and copolymer composition, the breadth and shape of the damping peaks changed in a systematic and predictable way. Controlled partial phase separation would appear to be a powerful way to tailoring polymer properties for a particular application. 

Diblock, triblock, and multiblock copolymers are typically prepared by sequential monomer addition to polymerization systems in which the chain-breaking reactions are sufficiently suppressed. Polymer properties can thereby be varied by manipulating the constituent blocks compatibilities, hydrophilicities/hydrophobicities, and hardness/softness. New and/ or novel topologies can also be prepared by controlled processes, including cyclic polymers and/or copolymers, comb-like macromolecules, and star polymers. The synthetic range of cationic vinyl polymerizations will be discussed in detail in Chapter 5. 

As one of the blocks becomes polar relative to the other, the Krause theory (Section 4.7.1) predicts that phase separation will occur with shorter block lengths. Given the shorter block lengths, we are required to consider multiblock polymers of the form ABABAB in order to maintain high molecular weight and concomitant polymer properties. This chapter will consider two important classes of multiblock copolymers, the polyurethanes and the ionomers. 

These multiblock terpolymers are laboratory products. They were prepared in order to evaluate the influence of the incorporation of a third block into the macromolecule on the copolymer phase structure. An attempt was made to change the morphology (from microphase to nanophase) in the Hytrel -type elastomers thereby, the interphase could be expanded. The elastomers having a nanophase structure are polymers with a better shape memory than those with coarse morphology. By the incorporation of a third block, the properties of multiblock polymers can be modified so that different shape memory effects can be achieved (for shape memory effects, see also Chapter 18). 

The thermal transitions and the relaxation processes observed in multiblock terpolymers allow to evaluate their phase morphology. At room temperature, these polymers are composed of three phases hard, soft, and strongly expanded interphase. The two latter phases are amorphous and form a matrix (continuous phase), whereas the hard (crystalline) phase is the dispersed phase. The thermal transition and relaxation processes occurring in the interphase of the multiblock copolymers are not detected by the DSC and DMTA methods. The incorporation of the third short block into the copolymer chain causes an increase in the volume of the interphase. This facilitates the establishment of the processes occurring in this phase at various temperatures. Moreover, it enables the evaluation of the influence of the dimension and composition of this phase on the polymer properties. (About the number of phases in poly(ether ester) thermoplastic elastomers, see also Chapter 6.)... 

The importance of oxygen and moisture permeability of siloxanes has been discussed in Section 3.12.4.9. Among many new siloxane polymers and co-polymers, novel polyamide PDMS multiblock co-polymers were evaluated for gas permeability and thermomechanical properties.600... 

Spontak RJ, Smith SD (2001) Perfectly-alternating linear (AB)n multiblock copolymers effect of molecular design on morphology and properties. J Polym Sci B 39 947-955... 

A block copolymer is expected to be superior to a graft copolymer in stabilizing dispersions of one polymer in another because there will be fewer conformational restraints to the penetration of each segment type into the homopolymer with which it is compatible. Similarly, diblock copolymers might be more effective than triblock copolymers, for the same reason, although tri- and multiblock copolymers may confer other advantages on the blend because of the different mechanical properties of these copolymers. 

After following the microhardness behaviour during the stress-induced polymorphic transition of homo-PBT and its multiblock copolymers attention is now focused on the deformation behaviour of a blend of PBT and a PEE thermoplastic elastomer, the latter being a copolymer of PBT and PEO. This system is attractive not only because the two polymers have the same crystallizable component but also because the copolymer, being an elastomer, strongly affects the mechanical properties of the blend. It should be mentioned that these blends have been well characterized by differential scanning calorimetry, SAXS, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis and static mechanical measurements (Apostolov et al, 1994). 

For both designs a microphase separated morphology was found with 20-50 nm peptide domains dispersed in a continuous poly(ethylene glycol) phase. Furthermore, a 100-150 nm superstructure was observed in cast films, which was explained to result from the polydispersity and multiblock character of the polymers. The mechanical properties of fibers and films made from these block copolymers could be modulated by manipulating the length and nature of the constituent blocks. Similar work was reported by Shao et al. [47]. 

The adsorption of proteins at interfaces is a key step in the stabilization of numerous food and non-food foams and emulsions. Our goal is to improve our understanding of the relationships between the sequence of proteins and their surface properties. A theoretical approach has been developed to model the structure and properties of protein adsorption layers using the analogy between proteins and multiblock copolymers. This model seems to be particularly well suited to /5-casein. However, the exponent relating surface pressure to surface concentration is indicative of a polymer structure intermediate between that of a two-dimensional excluded volume chain and a partially collapsed chain. For the protein structure, this would correspond to attractive interactions between some amino acids (hydrogen bonds, for instance). To test this possibility, guanidine hydrochloride was added to the buffer. A transition in the structure and properties of the layer is noticed for a 1.5 molar concentration of the denaturant. Beyond the transition, the properties of the layer are those of a two-dimensional excluded volume chain, a situation expected when there are no attractive interac-... 

---