Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Muffin-tin orbitals

The LMTO method [58, 79] can be considered to be the linear version of the KKR teclmique. According to official LMTO historians, the method has now reached its third generation [79] the first starting with Andersen in 1975 [58], the second connnonly known as TB-LMTO. In the LMTO approach, the wavefimction is expanded in a basis of so-called muffin-tin orbitals. These orbitals are adapted to the potential by constmcting them from solutions of the radial Scln-ddinger equation so as to fomi a minimal basis set. Interstitial properties are represented by Hankel fiinctions, which means that, in contrast to the LAPW teclmique, the orbitals are localized in real space. The small basis set makes the method fast computationally, yet at the same time it restricts the accuracy. The localization of the basis fiinctions diminishes the quality of the description of the wavefimction in die interstitial region. [Pg.2213]

Methfessel M, Rodriguez C O and Andersen O K 1989 Fast full-potential calculations with a converged basis of atom-centered linear muffIn-tIn orbitals structural and dynamic properties of silicon Phys. Rev. B 40 2009-12... [Pg.2232]

We have used the basis set of the Linear-Muffin-Tin-Orbital (LMTO) method in the atomic sphere approximation (ASA). The LMTO-ASA is based on the work of Andersen and co-workers and the combined technique allows us to treat all phases on equal footing. To treat itinerant magnetism we have employed the Vosko-Wilk-Nusair parametrization for the exchange-correlation energy density and potential. In conjunction with this we have treated the alloying effects for random and partially ordered phases with a multisublattice generalization of the coherent potential approximation (CPA). [Pg.57]

O.K. Andersen, Z. Pawlowska, and O. Jepsen, Illustration of the linear-muffin-tin-orbital tight-binding representation Compact orbitals and charge density in Si, Phys. Rev. B 34 5253 (1986). [Pg.61]

Theoretical calculations were performed with the linear muffin tin orbital (LMTO) method and the local density approximation for exchange and correlation. This method was used in combination with supercell models containing up to 16 atoms to calculate the DOS. The LMTO calculations are run self consistently and the DOS obtained are combined with the matrix elements for the transitions from initial to final states as described in detail elsewhere (Botton et al., 1996a) according to the method described by Vvedensky (1992). A comparison is also made between spectra calculated for some of the B2 compounds using the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method. [Pg.176]

B. Wenzien J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal and M. Sob, On the calculation of the surface Green s function by the tight-binding linear-muffin tin orbital method, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 9893 (1989). [Pg.244]

I.A. Abrikosov and H.L.Skriver, Self-consistent linear-muffin-tin-orbitals coherent-potential technique for bulk and surfaces calculations Cu-Ni, Ag-Pd, and Au-Pt random alloys, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16 532 (1993). [Pg.244]

Weyrich, K.H. (1988) Full-potential linear muffin-tin-orbital method, Phys. Rev., B37, 10269-10282. [Pg.101]

The adequacy of the spin-averaged approach has been confirmed in self-consistent spin-density-functional calculations for H in Si by Van de Walle et al. (1989). The deviation from the spin-averaged results is expected to be largest for H at the tetrahedral interstitial (T) site, where the crystal charge density reaches its lowest value. For neutral H at the T site, it was found that inclusion of spin polarization lowered the total energy of the defect only by 0.1 eV. The defect level was split into a spin-up and a spin-down level, which were separated by 0.4 eV. These results are consistent with spin-polarized linearized-muffin-tin-orbital (LMTO) Green s-function calculations (Beeler, 1986). [Pg.606]

A different approach was taken by Hao and Cooper (1994), who used a combination of the him linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) method and an ab initio molecular quantum cluster method, to investigate S02 adsorption on a Cu monolayer supported by 7—AI2O3. Emphasis here was on the geometry of adsorption sites, with the conclusion that the preferred adsorption site is the Al—Al bridging one. [Pg.83]

The CPA has proved to be an enormously successful tool in the study of alloys, and has been implemented within various frameworks, such as the TB, linear muffin-tin orbital and Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (Kumar et al 1992, Turek et al 1996), and is still considered to be the most satisfactory single-site approximation. Efforts to do better than the single-site CPA have focused on multi-site (or cluster) CPA s (see, e.g., Gonis et al 1984, Turek et al 1996), in which a central site and its set of nearest neighbours are embedded in an effective medium. Still, for present purposes, the single-site version of the CPA suffices, and we derive the necessary equations here, within the framework of the TB model. [Pg.93]

ANG AO ATA BF CB CF CNDO CPA DBA DOS FL GF HFA LDOS LMTO MO NN TBA VB VCA WSL Anderson-Newns-Grimley atomic orbital average t-matrix approximation Bessel function conduction band continued fraction complete neglect of differential overlap coherent-potential approximation disordered binary alloy density of states Fermi level Green function Flartree-Fock approximation local density of states linear muffin-tin orbital molecular orbital nearest neighbour tight-binding approximation valence band virtual crystal approximation Wannier-Stark ladder... [Pg.225]

The results are conveniently and clearly expressed in a thermodynamic formalism this is why they find their place in this chapter. They depend however on parameters which are drawn from band-theory, especially from the LMTO-ASA (Linear Muffin-Tin Orbitals-Atomic Sphere Approximation) method. [Pg.96]

In this paper we present preliminary results of an ab-initio study of quantum diffusion in the crystalline a-AlMnSi phase. The number of atoms in the unit cell (138) is sufficiently small to permit computation with the ab-initio Linearized Muffin Tin Orbitals (LMTO) method and provides us a good starting model. Within the Density Functional Theory (DFT) [15,16], this approach has still limitations due to the Local Density Approximation (LDA) for the exchange-correlation potential treatment of electron correlations and due to the approximation in the solution of the Schrodinger equation as explained in next section. However, we believe that this starting point is much better than simplified parametrized tight-binding like s-band models. [Pg.536]

To probe the electronic structures of the materials in the solid state, band structure calculations on the crystal structure of compound 22 were carried out. The results obtained by using the linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) self-consistent field (SCF) method support the interpretation that compounds 22 (R1 = Me, Et R2 = H) are small-band-gap semiconductors. [Pg.523]

FP-LMTO full potential-linear muffin tin orbitals ... [Pg.179]

Deriving an energy-linearized version of MST, Andersen [12,9] introduced muffin-tin orbital (MTO) basis functions. These functions have the form

[Pg.101]

The surface matching theorem makes it possible to generalize the idea of muffin-tin orbitals to a nonspherical Wigner-Seitz cell r. Each local basis orbital is represented as (p =a x + V on the cell surface a, where y and p are the auxiliary functions defined by the surface matching theorem. An atomic-cell orbital (ACO) is defined as the function — y, regular inside r. By construction, the smooth continuation of this ACO outside r is the function p. The specific functional forms are... [Pg.102]


See other pages where Muffin-tin orbitals is mentioned: [Pg.2213]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.102]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.17 , Pg.69 , Pg.116 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.423 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.329 ]




SEARCH



Full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital

Linear Muffin-Tin Orbital Programme LMTO

Linear combination of muffin-tin orbitals

Linear muffin-tin orbital

Linear muffin-tin orbital method

Linear muffin-tin orbital method LMTO)

Linearized muffin tin orbital method

Linearized muffin-tin orbitals

Muffin Tin Orbital

Muffin-Tin Orbitals and One-Centre Expansion

Muffin-Tin Orbitals in the ASA

Muffin-tin

Muffin-tin orbital method

Muffins

Other Muffin-Tin Orbital methods

The Exact Muffin-Tin Orbital Method

Tight-binding linear muffin-tin orbital

© 2024 chempedia.info