Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Muffin tin

Figure B3.2.3. The muffin-tin spheres in the (110) plane of a zineblende erystal. The niielei are surrounded by spheres of equal size, eovering about 34% of the erystal volume. Uuoeeupied tetrahedral positions are iudieated by erosses. The eouveutioual unit eell is shown at the bottom the erystal direetions are noted. Figure B3.2.3. The muffin-tin spheres in the (110) plane of a zineblende erystal. The niielei are surrounded by spheres of equal size, eovering about 34% of the erystal volume. Uuoeeupied tetrahedral positions are iudieated by erosses. The eouveutioual unit eell is shown at the bottom the erystal direetions are noted.
The LMTO method [58, 79] can be considered to be the linear version of the KKR teclmique. According to official LMTO historians, the method has now reached its third generation [79] the first starting with Andersen in 1975 [58], the second connnonly known as TB-LMTO. In the LMTO approach, the wavefimction is expanded in a basis of so-called muffin-tin orbitals. These orbitals are adapted to the potential by constmcting them from solutions of the radial Scln-ddinger equation so as to fomi a minimal basis set. Interstitial properties are represented by Hankel fiinctions, which means that, in contrast to the LAPW teclmique, the orbitals are localized in real space. The small basis set makes the method fast computationally, yet at the same time it restricts the accuracy. The localization of the basis fiinctions diminishes the quality of the description of the wavefimction in die interstitial region. [Pg.2213]

Methfessel M, Rodriguez C O and Andersen O K 1989 Fast full-potential calculations with a converged basis of atom-centered linear muffIn-tIn orbitals structural and dynamic properties of silicon Phys. Rev. B 40 2009-12... [Pg.2232]

We have used the basis set of the Linear-Muffin-Tin-Orbital (LMTO) method in the atomic sphere approximation (ASA). The LMTO-ASA is based on the work of Andersen and co-workers and the combined technique allows us to treat all phases on equal footing. To treat itinerant magnetism we have employed the Vosko-Wilk-Nusair parametrization for the exchange-correlation energy density and potential. In conjunction with this we have treated the alloying effects for random and partially ordered phases with a multisublattice generalization of the coherent potential approximation (CPA). [Pg.57]

O.K. Andersen, Z. Pawlowska, and O. Jepsen, Illustration of the linear-muffin-tin-orbital tight-binding representation Compact orbitals and charge density in Si, Phys. Rev. B 34 5253 (1986). [Pg.61]

Most of the present implementations of the CPA on the ab-initio level, both for bulk and surface cases, assume a lattice occupied by atoms with equal radii of Wigner-Seitz (or muffin-tin) spheres. The effect of charge transfer which can seriously influence the alloy energetics is often neglected. Several methods were proposed to account for charge transfer effects in bulk alloys, e.g., the so-called correlated CPA , or the screened-impurity model . The application of these methods to alloy surfaces seems to be rather complicated. [Pg.134]

Theoretical calculations were performed with the linear muffin tin orbital (LMTO) method and the local density approximation for exchange and correlation. This method was used in combination with supercell models containing up to 16 atoms to calculate the DOS. The LMTO calculations are run self consistently and the DOS obtained are combined with the matrix elements for the transitions from initial to final states as described in detail elsewhere (Botton et al., 1996a) according to the method described by Vvedensky (1992). A comparison is also made between spectra calculated for some of the B2 compounds using the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method. [Pg.176]

B. Wenzien J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal and M. Sob, On the calculation of the surface Green s function by the tight-binding linear-muffin tin orbital method, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 9893 (1989). [Pg.244]

I.A. Abrikosov and H.L.Skriver, Self-consistent linear-muffin-tin-orbitals coherent-potential technique for bulk and surfaces calculations Cu-Ni, Ag-Pd, and Au-Pt random alloys, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16 532 (1993). [Pg.244]

The muffin-tin potential around each atom in the unit cell has been calculated in the framework of the Local-Spin-Density-Approximation using the ASW method. The ASW method uses the atomic sphere approximation (ASA), i.e. for each atom a sphere radius is chosen such that the sum of the volumes of all the overlapping spheres equals the unit cell volume. The calculation yields the expected ferromagnetic coupling between Cr and Ni. From the self-consistent spin polarized DOS, partial and total magnetic moment per formula unit can be computed. The calculated total magnetic moment is 5.2 pg in agreement with the experimental value (5.3 0.1 e calculations presented here have been performed... [Pg.463]

Foulis, D.L., Pettifer, R.F., and Sherwood, P, 1995, The removal of the muffin-tin approximation and use of self-consistent-field electron densities for calculating the K-edge X-ray absorption nearedge structure of chlorine, Europhys. Lett. 29 647. [Pg.489]

Sun, C., and Su, C., 1978, Overlapping muffin tin multiple scattering wave Xo method, Scienta Sinica 21 327. [Pg.490]

You are probably most familiar with Teflon as a nonstick coating for kitchen utensils (Figure 23.2). The slippery surface of Teflon-coated fry pans and muffin tins results from Teflon s extremely low coefficient of friction. [Pg.614]

If financially feasible, suggest the use of commerdally available drug organizers. If the patient cannot afford drug organizers, egg cartons or a muffin tin can be labeled and used as drug organize s. [Pg.57]

Sift together the flour, baking powder and salt. Stir in the elder flowers or berries. Add the remaining ingredients. Fill lightly greased muffin tins 2/3 full and bake in an oven preheated to 400 degrees F. for 25 minutes. [Pg.54]

Weyrich, K.H. (1988) Full-potential linear muffin-tin-orbital method, Phys. Rev., B37, 10269-10282. [Pg.101]

The adequacy of the spin-averaged approach has been confirmed in self-consistent spin-density-functional calculations for H in Si by Van de Walle et al. (1989). The deviation from the spin-averaged results is expected to be largest for H at the tetrahedral interstitial (T) site, where the crystal charge density reaches its lowest value. For neutral H at the T site, it was found that inclusion of spin polarization lowered the total energy of the defect only by 0.1 eV. The defect level was split into a spin-up and a spin-down level, which were separated by 0.4 eV. These results are consistent with spin-polarized linearized-muffin-tin-orbital (LMTO) Green s-function calculations (Beeler, 1986). [Pg.606]

A different approach was taken by Hao and Cooper (1994), who used a combination of the him linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) method and an ab initio molecular quantum cluster method, to investigate S02 adsorption on a Cu monolayer supported by 7—AI2O3. Emphasis here was on the geometry of adsorption sites, with the conclusion that the preferred adsorption site is the Al—Al bridging one. [Pg.83]

The CPA has proved to be an enormously successful tool in the study of alloys, and has been implemented within various frameworks, such as the TB, linear muffin-tin orbital and Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (Kumar et al 1992, Turek et al 1996), and is still considered to be the most satisfactory single-site approximation. Efforts to do better than the single-site CPA have focused on multi-site (or cluster) CPA s (see, e.g., Gonis et al 1984, Turek et al 1996), in which a central site and its set of nearest neighbours are embedded in an effective medium. Still, for present purposes, the single-site version of the CPA suffices, and we derive the necessary equations here, within the framework of the TB model. [Pg.93]

ANG AO ATA BF CB CF CNDO CPA DBA DOS FL GF HFA LDOS LMTO MO NN TBA VB VCA WSL Anderson-Newns-Grimley atomic orbital average t-matrix approximation Bessel function conduction band continued fraction complete neglect of differential overlap coherent-potential approximation disordered binary alloy density of states Fermi level Green function Flartree-Fock approximation local density of states linear muffin-tin orbital molecular orbital nearest neighbour tight-binding approximation valence band virtual crystal approximation Wannier-Stark ladder... [Pg.225]

Muffin-tin scatterers, 34 212 periodic muffin-tin, 34 218 Muller and Schaich formalism, 34 217 Muller-Gault mechanism, 30 17 Multicomponent catalysts, early studies of, 2 81... [Pg.150]

These approximations, and additional ones involving the muffin tin potential, have been described in recent reviews. (3 - ) In particular, the work reported here is entirely analogous to our earlier calculations on porphyrins,(5-10) where we discuss the method of calculation in some detail. [Pg.60]


See other pages where Muffin tin is mentioned: [Pg.2210]    [Pg.2211]    [Pg.2211]    [Pg.2213]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.385]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.132 ]




SEARCH



Full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital

Linear Combination of Muffin-Tin

Linear Muffin-Tin Orbital Programme LMTO

Linear combination of muffin-tin orbitals

Linear muffin-tin orbital

Linear muffin-tin orbital method

Linear muffin-tin orbital method LMTO)

Linearized muffin tin orbital method

Linearized muffin-tin orbitals

Muffin Tin Orbital

Muffin tin approximation

Muffin-Tin Orbitals and One-Centre Expansion

Muffin-Tin Orbitals in the ASA

Muffin-tin constant

Muffin-tin method

Muffin-tin model

Muffin-tin orbital method

Muffin-tin orbitals

Muffin-tin potential

Muffins

Other Muffin-Tin Orbital methods

Partial Waves for a Single Muffin-Tin

The Exact Muffin-Tin Orbital Method

Tight-binding linear muffin-tin orbital

© 2024 chempedia.info