Molecular systems, quantum interference

As discussed by M. Shapiro and R Brumer in the book Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, there are two general control strategies that can be applied to harness and direct molecular dynamics optimal control and coherent control. The optimal control schemes aim to find a sef of external field parameters that conspire - through quantum interferences or by incoherent addition - to yield the best possible outcome for a specific, desired evolution of a quantum system. Coherent control relies on interferences, constructive or destructive, that prohibit or enhance certain reaction pathways. Both of these control strategies meet with challenges when applied to molecular collisions. 

In this review, we have discussed the Feshbach-Lowdin PT as a tool for studying multidimensional quantum dynamics of (molecular) systems. The central element in this approach is the emergence of overlapping resonances through the application of the PT on the Hilbert space of the system under study, and the possibility that such resonances ultimately interfere. The TOR, which is the result of this approach, provides a fruitful method to understand and conceptually link diverse physical phenomena and processes. We have tried to demonstrate this by discussing various examples, as FIT and ORIT, the suppression of spontaneous decay in atoms and molecules, and the CC of IC in pyrazine and / -carotene, as well as of IVR in the OCS molecule. 

Recent years have also witnessed exciting developments in the active control of unimolecular reactions [30,31]. Reactants can be prepared and their evolution interfered with on very short time scales, and coherent hght sources can be used to imprint information on molecular systems so as to produce more or less of specified products. Because a well-controlled unimolecular reaction is highly nonstatistical and presents an excellent example in which any statistical theory of the reaction dynamics would terribly fail, it is instmctive to comment on how to view the vast control possibihties, on the one hand, and various statistical theories of reaction rate, on the other hand. Note first that a controlled unimolecular reaction, most often subject to one or more external fields and manipulated within a very short time scale, undergoes nonequilibrium processes and is therefore not expected to be describable by any unimolecular reaction rate theory that assumes the existence of an equilibrium distribution of the internal energy of the molecule. Second, strong deviations Ifom statistical behavior in an uncontrolled unimolecular reaction can imply the existence of order in chaos and thus more possibilities for inexpensive active control of product formation. Third, most control scenarios rely on quantum interference effects that are neglected in classical reaction rate theory. Clearly, then, studies of controlled reaction dynamics and studies of statistical reaction rate theory complement each other. 

The effect of quantum interference on spontaneous emission in atomic and molecular systems is the generation of superposition states that can be manipulated, to reduce the interaction with the environment, by adjusting the polarizations of the transition dipole moments, or the amplitudes and phases of the external driving fields. With a suitable choice of parameters, the superposition states can decay with controlled and significantly reduced rates. This modification can lead to subnatural linewidths in the fluorescence and absorption spectra [5,10]. Furthermore, as will be shown in this review, the superposition states can even be decoupled from the environment and the population can be trapped in these states without decaying to the lower levels. These states, known as dark or trapped states, were predicted in many configurations of multilevel systems [11], as well as in multiatom systems [12],... 

This represents a formidable practical problem, as one is very unlikely to find isolated atoms with two nonorthogonal dipole moments and quantum states close in energy. Consider, for example, a V-type atom with the upper states 11), 3) and the ground state 2). The evaluation of the dipole matrix elements produces the following selection rules in terms of the angular momentum quantum numbers J — J2 = 1,0, J3 — J2 = 1,0, and Mi — M2 = M3 — M2 = 1,0. Since Mi / M3, in many atomic systems, p12 is perpendicular to p32 and the atomic transitions are independent. Xia et al. [62] have found transitions with parallel and antiparallel dipole moments in sodium molecules (dimers) and have demonstrated experimentally the effect of quantum interference on the fluorescence intensity. We discuss the experiment in more details in the next section. Here, we point out that the transitions with parallel and antiparallel dipole moments in the sodium dimers result from a mixing of the molecular states due to the spin-orbit coupling. 

---