Molecular parameters, definitions

Most important, however, was the discovery by Simha et al. [152, 153], de Gennes [4] and des Cloizeaux [154] that the overlap concentration is a suitable parameter for the formulation of universal laws by which semi-dilute solutions can be described. Semi-dilute solutions have already many similarities to polymers in the melt. Their understanding has to be considered as the first essential step for an interpretation of materials properties in terms of molecular parameters. Here now the necessity of the dilute solution properties becomes evident. These molecular solution parameters are not universal, but they allow a definition of the overlap concentration, and with this a universal picture of behavior can be designed. This approach was very successful in the field of linear macromolecules. The following outline will demonstrate the utility of this approach also for branched polymers in the semi-dilute regime. 

Definitions and formulae of the molecular parameters (16.17. 18,19) obtained are as follows ... 

The choice of the effective Hamiltonian is often far from straightforward indeed we have devoted a whole chapter to this subject (chapter 7). In this section we give a gentle introduction to the problems involved, and show that the definition of a particular molecular parameter is not always simple. The problem we face is not difficult to understand. We are usually concerned with the sub-structure of one or two rotational levels at most, and we aim to determine the values of the important parameters relating to those levels. However, these parameters may involve the participation of other vibrational and electronic states. We do not want an effective Hamiltonian which refers to other electronic states explicitly, because it would be very large, cumbersome and essentially unusable. We want to analyse our spectrum with an effective Hamiltonian involving only the quantum numbers that arise directly in the spectrum. The effects of all other states, and their quantum numbers, are to be absorbed into the definition and values of the molecular parameters . The way in which we do this is outlined briefly here, and thoroughly in chapter 7. 

In many places elsewhere in this book we describe the analysis of spectra, the definition and determination of molecular parameters from the spectra, and the relationships between these parameters and the wave functions for the molecules in question. Later in this chapter we will outline the principles and practice of calculating accurate wave functions for diatomic molecules. Before we can do that, however, we must discuss the calculation of atomic wave functions the methods originally developed for atoms were subsequently extended to deal with molecules. This is not the book for an exhaustive discussion of these topics, and so many accounts exist elsewhere that such a discussion is not necessary. Nevertheless we must pay some attention to this topic because the interpretation of spectroscopic data in terms of molecular wave functions is one of the primary motivations for obtaining the data in the first place. 

We have already seen in chapter 5 the importance of angular momenta in diatomic molecules. We now consider the various ways in which these angular momenta can be coupled in diatomic molecules, giving rise to Hund s coupling cases [57], As we will see many times elsewhere in this book, Hund s coupling cases are idealised situations which help us to understand the pattern of rotational levels and the resulting spectra. They are also central to the theory underlying the quantitative analysis of spectra and the consequent definition and determination of molecular parameters. 

These results are the same as those obtained by Freund, Herbst, Mariella and Klemperer [112] except for the. /-dependent phase factors in our matrices. These arise because of our specific definitions of the parity-conserved basis function and are necessary if the energies of the A-doublet components are to alternate with J. If we know the values of the five molecular constants appearing in these matrices, we can calculate the energies of the levels, of both parity types, for each value of J. In practice, of course, it was the task of the experimental spectroscopists to solve the reverse problem of determining the molecular parameters from the observed transition frequencies. 

A more basic difficulty and one not yet adequately resolved is that encountered in the use of artificial models to represent molecules. From a rigorous point of view the entire behavior of a molecular encounter is determined by the force field surrounding each molecule. By representing molecular force fields by artificial models we avoid the impossible mathematical problem involved in the rigorous approach. The result, however, is to introduce an entirely new set of molecular parameters which remain as yet unpredictable from simpler molecular properties. In the case of the hard sphere model we have introduced the molecular diameter additional parameters which were somewhat concealed in the discussion, namely, the two accommodation coefficients, one for velocity transfers between molecules in collision and the other for collision between molecules and surfaces. 

To be able to utilize this formula a great deal of information concerning molecular parameters is required. To calculate N E) rotational constants and vibrational frequencies of internal motion are required and in many case these are available from spectroscopic studies of the stable molecule. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for the parameters required to calculate G E) because, by definition, the transition state is a very short lived species and is therefore not amenable to spectroscopic analysis. The situation is aggravated still further by the fact that many unimolecular dissociation processes do not have a well defined transition state on the reaction coordinate. It is precisely these difficulties that make ILT an attractive alternative as it does not require a detailed knowledge of transition state properties. 

In this contribution we discuss mm based on pp chromophores, a very interesting class of molecules for applications in molecular photonics and electronics. Push-pull chromophores are both polar and polarizable and this makes the role of intermolecular interactions particularly important. The toy model we propose for clusters of pp chromophores neglects intermolecular overlap, just accounting for classical electrostatic intermolecular interactions, and describes each pp chromophore based on a two state model. The two-state model for pp chromophores has been discussed and validated via an extensive comparison with the spectroscopic properties of several dyes in solution [74, 75, 90], The emerging picture is safe and led to the definition of a reliable set of molecular parameters for selected dyes. This analysis then offers valuable information to be inserted into models for clusters of interacting chromophores, in a the bottom-up modeling strategy that was nicely exemplified in Ref. [90]. 

Derivation of molecular parameters from rotational constants is not a new subject, and many discussions of the various methods have previously been presented. One of the more complete of the recent accounts is that by Gordy and Cook.1 Definitions of the different molecular parameters are given by Laurie elsewhere in this volume and have also been given recently by Kuchitsu and Cyvin.2 The fundamental papers on this subject include the series by Herschbach and Laurie3-5 and by Morino, Oka, and co-workers.6-9 The present discussion will concentrate on a description of the computational strategies that may be employed and the problems that occur in practical cases. For the usual reasons of familiarity the examples will be dominated by work done at Michigan State University. 

The principal application of the Kraitchman equations [Eq. (9)1 is for the determination of the atomic coordinates, at, bSi and cs. From a study of the rotational spectrum of the parent and of a species with single isotopic substitution the coordinates of the substituted atom may be determined. These coordinates are referred to as substitution coordinates or rs coordinates. Each new species yields new coordinates, and since all of the coordinates are in the same coordinate system, the calculation of substitution or rs bond distances and bond angles is a simple process. Costain,s demonstrated that there are definite advantages to the use of the Kraitchman equations to obtain molecular parameters. These advantages are sufficient to make the use of Kraitchman s equations the preferred method of structure determination from ground-state rotational constants. 

Classical thennodynamics deals with the interconversion of energy in all its forms including mechanical, thermal and electrical. Helmholtz [1], Gibbs [2,3] and others defined state functions such as enthalpy, heat content and entropy to handle these relationships. State functions describe closed energy states/systems in which the energy conversions occur in equilibrium, reversible paths so that energy is conserved. These notions are more fully described below. State functions were described in Appendix 2A however, statistical thermodynamics derived state functions from statistical arguments based on molecular parameters rather than from basic definitions as summarized below. 

---