Molecular incidence matrix

Derived from the -> H-depleted molecular graph, the incidence matrix [Bonchev and Trinajstic, 1977] is a rectangular matrix representation of a graph whose rows are the vertices (atoms, A) and columns are the edges (bonds, B), i.e. having a dimension AxB. Their elements are i,y = 1 if the edge ey is incident to the vertex V , otherwise... 

The simplest form to represent the chemical information contained in a molecular graph is by a -> matrix representation of a molecular structure. Examples are -+ adjacency matrix A, - edge adjacency matrix E, vertex - distance matrix D, -> edge distance matrix D, - incidence matrix I, - Wiener matrix W, -> Hosoya Z-matrix Z, - Cluj matrices CJ, - detour matrix A, - Szeged matrix SZ, -> distance/distance matrix DD, and - detour/distance matrix A/D. 

Derived from the H-depleted molecular graph, the vertex-edge incidence matrix, denoted by is a rectangular, usually unsymmetrical, matrix Ax B whose rows are the vertices (A) and columns the edges (B) of a graph [Bonchev and Trinajstic, 1977]. Its elements equal one if the vertex v is incident to the edge Cj, and zero otherwise... 

The simplest form to represent the chemical information contained in a molecular graph is by graph-theoretical matrices. Examples are adjacency matrix A, —> edge a acency matrix E, vertex distance matrix D, edge distance matrix D, incidence matrix I, —> Wienermatrix... 

The concepts of molecular and fragment structure were defined in the previous chapter, Section 1.1, in terms of incidence matrices. In structure correlation we compare molecules with the same incidence matrix coming from different crystal structures, or fragments with the same incidence matrix coming from different molecules. More often than not, the molecules or fragments in which we are interested show little or no symmetry. Why then should a book on structure correlation contain a chapter dealing with symmetry aspects What symmetry aspects ... 

Molecular architectures can be structurally classified as being more comb-like or Cayley tree-like. Structure has impact on the radius of gyration, which is larger for linear molecules than for branched molecules of the same weight (number of monomer units), since the latter are more compact. The ratio between branched and linear radius is usually described by a contraction factor . Furthermore, Cayley tree-like structures are more compact than comb-like structures [33, 56]. We will show here how to obtain the contraction factor from the architectural information. The squared radius of gyration is expressed in monomer sizes. According to a statistical-mechanical model [55] it follows from the architecture as represented in graph theoretical terms, the KirchhofF matrix, K, which is derived from the incidence matrix, C [33] ... 

A big step forward came with the discovery that bombardment of a liquid target surface by abeam of fast atoms caused continuous desorption of ions that were characteristic of the liquid. Where this liquid consisted of a sample substance dissolved in a solvent of low volatility (a matrix), both positive and negative molecular or quasi-molecular ions characteristic of the sample were produced. The process quickly became known by the acronym FAB (fast-atom bombardment) and for its then-fabulous results on substances that had hitherto proved intractable. Later, it was found that a primary incident beam of fast ions could be used instead, and a more generally descriptive term, LSIMS (liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry) has come into use. However, note that purists still regard and refer to both FAB and LSIMS as simply facets of the original SIMS. In practice, any of the acronyms can be used, but FAB and LSIMS are more descriptive when referring to the primary atom or ion beam. 

The FAB matrix is essentially a nonvolatile liquid material, such as those illustrated in Scheme 1, that serves to constantly replenish the surface with new sample as the incident ion beam bombards the surface. The matrix also serves to minimize sample damage from the high-energy particle beam by absorbing most of the incident energy and is believed to facilitate the ionization process. The spectrum produced often includes matrix peaks along with some fragments and a peak for the protonated or cationized (i.e., M + Na+) molecular ion. 

It should be noted that the presence of cross-links results in the partial or complete loss of control over the size of the polymer molecules, even if the living character of the polymerization can sometimes be preserved. Incidently, one of the characteristics of MIPs is that they are cross-linked polymers. This cross-linking is necessary in order to maintain the conformation of the three-dimensional binding sites obtained through the molecular imprinting process, and thus the ability of the polymer to recognize specifically and selectively its target molecule. Nevertheless, even with cross-linked polymers, the use of CRP methods may be beneficial, as it can, up to a certain point, improve the structure of the polymer matrix. Indeed, all of the above CRP methods have been applied to MIPs. 

To determine the scattered radiation spectrum of an oscillating molecule under conditions of resonance excitation, we must consider how the polarizability a varies not only with normal modes of vibration but also with frequency of the incident radiation that excites them. For a molecule in a molecular state ) (initial) perturbed by the electromagnetic wave of frequency vq so that it passes into a molecular state I /) (final) while scattering light of frequency vo r (v = V/ - Vg), the matrix elements of a for the vibrational transition k, [oipa]k, are given by the Kramers-Heisenberg-Dirac (KHD) dispersion equation ... 

It should be noted that instead of dressing the molecular states g and s by 1 and 0 photons, respectively, we could use any photon numbers p and p — 1. The corresponding matrix elements are than proportional to p. In processes pertaining to linear spectroscopy it is convenient to stick with photon populations 1 and 0, keeping in mind that all observed fluxes should be proportional to the incident photon numberp or, more physically, to the incident field intensity fo P- With this in mind we will henceforth use the notation g, k) (or g, m if the incident direction is not important for the discussion) as a substitute for g, Ik)-... 

Now consider the A molecules case. For simplicity we assume that the spatial extent of this N molecule system is much smaller than the radiation wavelength. In this case all molecules are subject to the same incident beam and respond coherently. Following the short pulse of duration r = jiti/(2 o/ ) the density matrix of each molecule j evolves as before. The density matrix of the whole system is a direct product of these molecular contributions. The expectation value of the total system dipole operator Ajv = Az is... 

---