Molecular connectivity table

Due to their spatial localization, it follows that the interaction eneigy of an occupied LMO with any distant virtual LMO will be zero, and so the computational problem becomes reduced to annihilating matrix elements connecting LMOs that are close in space. These LMOs can be easily identified from the molecular connectivity table given the requirement that any allowed LMO spans one or two atoms. The Fock matrix element, Fif takes the form ... 

Leatherface is a 2-D molecular editor that modifies properties of atoms and bonds in molecular connection tables according to rules specified by the user. Unlike Permute, Leatherface encodes no chemical knowledge and neither processes nor generates 3-D structures. Its real strength is that it allows the user to impose a very detailed and precisely specified chemical view on large numbers of connection tables. 

Three sets of molecular descriptors that can be computed from a molecular connection table are defined. The descriptors are based on the subdivision and classification of the molecular surface area according to atomic properties (such as contribution to logP, molar refractivity, and partial charge). The resulting 32 descriptors are shown (a) to be weakly correlated with each other (b) to encode many traditional molecular descriptors and (c) to be useful for QSAR, QSPAR, and compound classification. 

The WLN was applied to indexing the Chemical Structure Index (CSI) at the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) [13] and the Ituiex Chemicus Registry System (ICRS) as well as the Crossbow System of Imperial Chemical Industries (ICl). With the introduction of connection tables in the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) in 1965 and the advent of molecular editors in the 1970s, which directly produced connection tables, the WLN lost its importance. 

A major disadvantage of a matrix representation for a molecular graph is that the number of entries increases with the square of the number of atoms in the molecule. What is needed is a representation of a molecular graph where the number of entries increases only as a linear function of the number of atoms in the molecule. Such a representation can be obtained by listing, in tabular form only the atoms and the bonds of a molecular structure. In this case, the indices of the row and column of a matrix entry can be used for identifying an entry. In essence, one has to distinguish each atom and each bond in a molecule. This is achieved by a list of the atoms and a list of the bonds giving the coimections between the atoms. Such a representation is called a connection table (CT). 

A connection table has been the predominant form of chemical structure representation in computer systems since the early 1980s and it is an alternative way of representing a molecular graph. Graph theory methods can equally well be applied to connection table representations of a molecule. 

Lines 4—18 form the connection table (Ctah), containing the description of the collection of atoms constituting the given compound, which can be wholly or partially connected by bonds. Such a collection can represent molecules, molecular fragments, substructures, substituent groups, and so on. In case of a Molfile, the Ctah block describes a single molecule. 

Deficiencies in Representing Molecular Structures by a Connection Table... 

The concept of connection tablc.s, a.s shown. so far, cannot represent adequately quite a number of molecular structures. Basically, a connection table represents only a single valence bond structure. Thus, any chemical species that cannot he described adequately by a single valence bond (VB) structure with single or multiple bonds between two atom.s is not handled accurately. 

Ferrocene (Figure 2-61a) has already been mentioned as a prime example of multi-haptic bonds, i.c, the electrons tlrat coordinate tire cyclopcntadicnyl rings with the iron atom are contained in a molecular orbital delocalized over all 11 atom centers [811, for w hich representation by a connection table having bonds between the iron atom and the five carbon atoms of cither cyclopcntadicnyl ring is totally inadequate. 

RAMSES is usually generated from molecular structures in a VB representation. The details of the connection table (localized charges, lone pairs, and bond orders) are kept within the model and are accessible for further processes. Bond orders are stored with the n-systems, while the number of free electrons is stored with the atoms. Upon modification oF a molecule (e.g., in systems dealing with reactions), the VB representation has to be generated in an adapted Form from the RAMSES notation. 

Z-matriccs arc commonly used as input to quantum mechanical ab initio and serai-empirical) calculations as they properly describe the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a molecule. Note that there is no explicit information on the connectivity present in the Z-matrix, as there is, c.g., in a connection table, but quantum mechanics derives the bonding and non-bonding intramolecular interactions from the molecular electronic wavefunction, starting from atomic wavefiinctions and a crude 3D structure. In contrast to that, most of the molecular mechanics packages require the initial molecular geometry as 3D Cartesian coordinates plus the connection table, as they have to assign appropriate force constants and potentials to each atom and each bond in order to relax and optimi-/e the molecular structure. Furthermore, Cartesian coordinates are preferable to internal coordinates if the spatial situations of ensembles of different molecules have to be compared. Of course, both representations are interconvertible. 

The method of building predictive models in QSPR/QSAR can also be applied to the modeling of materials without a unique, clearly defined structure. Instead of the connection table, physicochemical data as well as spectra reflecting the compound s structure can be used as molecular descriptors for model building,... 

A descriptor for the 3D arrangement of atoms in a molceulc can be derived in a similar manner. The Cartesian coordinates of the atoms in a molecule can be calculated by semi-empirical quantum mechanical or molecular mechanics (force field) methods, For larger data sets, fast 3D structure generators are available that combine data- and rule-driven methods to calculate Cartesian coordinates from the connection table of a molecule (e.g., CORINA [10]). 

The molecular editor consists of a java applet that is embedded in the HTML document. It encodes the drawing into a connection table in inol-format, which is sent to the web server. 

There are a number of different ways that the molecular graph can be conununicated between the computer and the end-user. One common representation is the connection table, of which there are various flavours, but most provide information about the atoms present in the molecule and their connectivity. The most basic connection tables simply indicate the atomic number of each atom and which atoms form each bond others may include information about the atom hybridisation state and the bond order. Hydrogens may be included or they may be imphed. In addition, information about the atomic coordinates (for the standard two-dimensional chemical drawing or for the three-dimensional conformation) can be included. The connection table for acetic acid in one of the most popular formats, the Molecular Design mol format [Dalby et al. 1992], is shown in Figure 12.3. 

An alternative way to represent molecules is to use a linear notation. A linear notation uses alphanumeric characters to code the molecular structure. These have the advantage of being much more compact than the connection table and so can be particularly useful for transmif-ting information about large numbers of molecules. The most famous of the early line notations is the Wiswesser line notation [Wiswesser 1954] the-SMILES notation is a more recent example that is increasingly popular [Weininger 1988]. To construct the Wiswesser... 

An important approach to the graphic representation of molecules is the use of a connection table. A connection table is a data base that stores the available bond types and hybridizations for individual atoms. Using the chemical formula and the connection table, molecular stmctures may be generated through interactive graphics in a menu-driven environment (31—33) or by using a linear input of code words (34,35). The connection table approach may be carried to the next step, computer-aided molecular design (CAMD) (36). 

The pore size of Cs2.2 and Cs2.1 cannot be determined by the N2 adsorption, so that their pore sizes were estimated from the adsorption of molecules having different molecular size. Table 3 compares the adsorption capacities of Csx for various molecules measured by a microbalance connected directly to an ultrahigh vacuum system [18]. As for the adsorption of benzene (kinetic diameter = 5.9 A [25]) and neopentane (kinetic diameter = 6.2 A [25]), the ratios of the adsorption capacity between Cs2.2 and Cs2.5 were similar to the ratio for N2 adsorption. Of interest are the results of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (kinetic diameter = 7.5 A [25]) and triisopropylbenzene (kinetic diameter = 8.5 A [25]). Both adsorbed significantly on Cs2.5, but httle on Cs2.2, indicating that the pore size of Cs2.2 is in the range of 6.2 -7.5 A and that of Cs2.5 is larger than 8.5 A in diameter. In the case of Cs2.1, both benzene and neopentane adsorbed only a little. Hence the pore size of Cs2.1 is less than 5.9 A. These results demonstrate that the pore structure can be controlled by the substitution for H+ by Cs+. 

Many biological, physical and chemical properties are clearly functions of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of a molecule. Thus, the understanding of receptor-ligand interactions, molecular properties or chemical reactivity requires not only information on how atoms are connected in a molecule (connection table), but also on their 3D structure. 

Table 8. Toxicity values (EC50) and molecular connectivity indices for various PAH compounds...

For the training data set (Table 11), few parameters of the 22 physical-chemical properties of the PAHs showed high significance vs log Koc. These are the log Kow, molecular weight, and molecular connectivity indices (3 Xp, 6X , 2XV). Table 14... 

An heuristic program written by Shelley (10) has been adapted for our computer system to display molecular structures and substructures from connectivity tables. Since the molecular structure and substructure representations are stored in a unique, irredundant form, the structure drawings facilitate visual comparison for commonalities. 

Table II. Interpretations of 8 principal components calculated from 90 variables based on molecular connectivity indices for 19,972 industrial chemicals. 

Prediction of BOD value. In the ten clusters Identified by the K-means clustering procedure, two clusters were represented by chemicals with only low BOD values and one cluster with nearly all (18 of 19 or 95 %) high BOD values (Table III). Therefore, no discrimination was attempted within these clusters. In the remaining clusters there were 202 high BOD chemicals and 97 low BOD chemicals. Of these, approximately 75 % (152 of 202) were correctly classified Into the high BOD class, while 73 Z (71 of 97) were correctly classified Into the low BOD class. Using both the clustering and discrimination analyses, 77 % (170 of 220) and 78 % (93 of 120) of the chemicals In the data base were correctly classified. Within each of the clusters, between 2 and 4 molecular connectivity Indices were used In the final discriminant functions to separate the two classes of BOD. Within each cluster a different combination of variables were used as discriminators. Because of Che exploratory nature of this analysis, we lowered the F-ratlo Inclusion level Co 1.0. In several of the clusters, the F-ratlos for variables Included In Che discriminant functions were subsequently small(e.g., < 4.0). 

Table IV. Summary of multiple regression analyses for the prediction of log P from molecular connectivity Indices (sample...

---