Molecular affinity potentials

In the present work, we shall investigate the problem of the amount of correlation accounted for in the DF formalism by comparing the molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) and dipole moments of CO and N2O calculated by DF and ab initio methods. It is indeed well known that the calculated dipole moment rf these compounds is critically dependent on the level of theory implemented and, in particular, that introduction of correlation is essential for an accurate prediction [13,14]. As the MEP property reflects reliably the partial charges distribution on the atoms of the molecule, it is expected that the MEP will exhibit a similar dependence and that its gross features correlate with the changes in the value of dipole moment when switching from one level of theory to the other. Such a behavior has indeed been reported recently by Luque et al. [15], but their study is limited to the ab initio method and we found it worthwhile to extend it to the DF formalism. Finally, the proton affinity and the site of protonation of N2O, as calculated by both DF and ab initio methods, will be reported. 

Binding affinity data of thiazoles and thiadiazoles at the hA3 AR have been subjected to QSAR analysis (Bhattacharya et al. 2005). This study disclosed the importance of molecular electrostatic potential surface (Wang-Ford charges) in correspondence of atoms C2, C5, C7, X8 and S9 (Fig. 7.6), the last two playing the most important roles. Furthermore, the A3 binding affinity increases with decrease of lipophilicity of the compounds and in the presence of short alkyl chains (Me or Et) at the R position. 

A relative scale of PA(B) has been established by examining the reaction shown in equation 23 for a large number of organic and inorganic bases. These data can be calibrated by reference to a variety of species for which absolute values of PA(B) may be derived from appearance potential measurements. The molecular ionization potentials IP(B) and the homo lytic bond dissociation energies D(B+—H) are linear functions of the proton affinity PA(B) for a homologous series of amines117-121. 

M.F. Herman, K.F. Freed, D.L. Yeager, in I. Prigogine, S.A. Rice (Eds.), Theoretical Studies of the Equations of Motion - Green s Function Methods for the Evaluation of Atomic and Molecular Ionization Potentials, Electron Affinities, and Excitation Energies, Advances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 48, Wiley, New York, 1981, p. 1. 

The ionization potential and electron affinity of naphthalene were determined experimentally as IP = 8.2 eV and EA 0.0 eV. According to Koopmans theorem it is possible to equate minus the orbital energies of the occupied or unoccupied MOs with molecular ionization potentials and electron affinities, respectively (IP, = - s, and EA = - ). Thus, in the simple one-electron model, the excitation energy of the HOMO->LUMO transition in naphthalene may be written according to Equation (1.22) as... 

As stated above, IGC is possibly the most rapid method for the evaluation of 7 and of a specific interaction parameter, Isp, that qualitatively describes the affinity of the solid surface for non specific interactions. London interactions between two partners are proportional to their polarisabilities, to their molecular ionisation potentials, and to the number of elemental volumes of the two phases in interaction. Hence, taking one partner as a molecular probe allows to detect changes that may occur when, for instance, submitting the other partner to heat treatments or chemical transformations. 

Audry E., Dallet, Ph., Langlois, M.H., Colleter, J.C. and Dubost, J.P. (1989) Quantitative structure-affinity relationships in a series of ttz adrenergic amines using the molecular lipophilicity potential. Proc. Clin. Biol. Res., 291, 63. 

Such second-order EPs have been used (Doll and Reinhardt, 1972 Purvis and Ohrn, 1974) to compute atomic and molecular ionization potentials, electron affinities, and even electron-atom shape resonance positions and lifetimes with some success. Based upon the experience gained to date, however, we cannot expect the accuracy of this approach to be better than 0.5 eV, even for systems that are described reasonably well by a singleconfiguration reference function. Often, this numerical accuracy is not satisfactory and hence the above formalism must be advanced to higher order (or replaced by another development that does not depend upon the Rayleigh-Schrodinger order concept). An example of such a second-order EP calculation is given in Problem 6.1. 

In actual practice, the change in the standard chemical potential (Ap°) is evaluated as the measure of the tendency of the solute to move from the solution to the fiber (i.e., the relative affinity of the substance for the fiber relative to the solution phase). This parameter is generally called the affinity and is usually expressed as ion affinities instead of as molecular affinities (see Table 5-18). One expression that describes the standard chemical potential, if the ion forms ideal solutions, is... 

Table 4 summarizes studies in which the molecular ionization potential, which is related to the HOMO level, and the molecular electron affinity, related to the molecular LUMO level, are correlated to the changes in V. This correlation fits the orbital interaction mechanism. 

E. Audry, P. Dallet, M. H. Langlois, J. C. Colleter, and J. P. Dubost, Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 291, 63 (1989). Quantitative Structure Affinity Rlelationships in a Series of a. Adrenergic Amines Using the Molecular Lipophilicity Potential. 

PES representation, students are asked to predict the reaction path. Locations, geometries, and energies of the two minima and of the transition state are also extracted from the PES graph (Figure 4). The AMI and PM3 results are compared with experimental and ab initio data. The last assignment is devoted to the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and HOMO of five organic molecules, which are calculated using AMI and displayed as 2D contours plots in HYPERCHEM. For each molecule, the more favorable sites for electrophilic attack are deduced from the position of the MEP minima and from the HOMO localization. Differences are discussed and results are con elated with gas phase proton affinity. 

The problems that occur when one tries to estimate affinity in terms of component terms do not arise when perturbation methods are used with simulations in order to compute potentials of mean force or free energies for molecular transformations simulations use a simple physical force field and thereby implicitly include all component terms discussed earlier. We have used the molecular transformation approach to compute binding affinities from these first principles [14]. The basic approach had been introduced in early work, in which we studied the affinity of xenon for myoglobin [11]. The procedure was to gradually decrease the interactions between xenon atom and protein, and compute the free energy change by standard perturbation methods, cf. (10). An (issential component is to impose a restraint on the... 

Quantum chemical descriptors such as atomic charges, HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO and LUMO orbital energy differences, atom-atom polarizabilities, super-delocalizabilities, molecular polarizabilities, dipole moments, and energies sucb as the beat of formation, ionization potential, electron affinity, and energy of protonation are applicable in QSAR/QSPR studies. A review is given by Karelson et al. [45]. 

---