Molar volume vapor pressure and

Table 2, WATER, Comparison of Predicted and Experimental Liquid Molar Volume, Vapor Pressure, and Saturated Vapor Compressibility Factor...

Why might stable isotope ratios differ in different materials Some of the effects derive from thermodynamics and are associated with differences in IR absorption, molar volume, vapor pressure, and boiling and melting points. Others derive from primary kinetic isotope effects (KIEs). We will discuss these further in Chapter 8, but bonds to heavier and lighter isotopes may be broken at different rates in chemical and biological processes, because the bonds have different strengths. 

An overview of some basic mathematical techniques for data correlation is to be found herein together with background on several types of physical property correlating techniques and a road map for the use of selected methods. Methods are presented for the correlation of observed experimental data to physical properties such as critical properties, normal boiling point, molar volume, vapor pressure, heats of vaporization and fusion, heat capacity, surface tension, viscosity, thermal conductivity, acentric factor, flammability limits, enthalpy of formation, Gibbs energy, entropy, activity coefficients, Henry s constant, octanol—water partition coefficients, diffusion coefficients, virial coefficients, chemical reactivity, and toxicological parameters. 

The agreement between calculated and observed values are excellent in molar volume, vapor pressure, entropy, heat of vaporization and heat capacity at constant pressure. 

In the multimedia models used in this series of volumes, an air-water partition coefficient KAW or Henry s law constant (H) is required and is calculated from the ratio of the pure substance vapor pressure and aqueous solubility. This method is widely used for hydrophobic chemicals but is inappropriate for water-miscible chemicals for which no solubility can be measured. Examples are the lower alcohols, acids, amines and ketones. There are reported calculated or pseudo-solubilities that have been derived from QSPR correlations with molecular descriptors for alcohols, aldehydes and amines (by Leahy 1986 Kamlet et al. 1987, 1988 and Nirmalakhandan and Speece 1988a,b). The obvious option is to input the H or KAW directly. If the chemical s activity coefficient y in water is known, then H can be estimated as vwyP[>where vw is the molar volume of water and Pf is the liquid vapor pressure. Since H can be regarded as P[IC[, where Cjs is the solubility, it is apparent that (l/vwy) is a pseudo-solubility. Correlations and measurements of y are available in the physical-chemical literature. For example, if y is 5.0, the pseudo-solubility is 11100 mol/m3 since the molar volume of water vw is 18 x 10-6 m3/mol or 18 cm3/mol. Chemicals with y less than about 20 are usually miscible in water. If the liquid vapor pressure in this case is 1000 Pa, H will be 1000/11100 or 0.090 Pa m3/mol and KAW will be H/RT or 3.6 x 10 5 at 25°C. Alternatively, if H or KAW is known, C[ can be calculated. It is possible to apply existing models to hydrophilic chemicals if this pseudo-solubility is calculated from the activity coefficient or from a known H (i.e., Cjs, P[/H or P[ or KAW RT). This approach is used here. In the fugacity model illustrations all pseudo-solubilities are so designated and should not be regarded as real, experimentally accessible quantities. 

As described earlier, Henry s law constants can be calculated from the ratio of vapor pressure and aqueous solubility. Henry s law constants do not show a simple linear pattern as solubility, Kqw or vapor pressure when plotted against simple molecular descriptors, such as numbers of chlorine or Le Bas molar volume, e.g., PCBs (Burkhard et al. 1985b), pesticides (Suntio et al. 1988), and chlorinated dioxins (Shiu et al. 1988). Henry s law constants can be estimated from ... 

FIGURE 1.7.11 Vapor pressure (liquid or supercooled liquid) versus Le Bas molar volume for alkylphenols and chlorophenols. 

Table 13.1). In the solid P(CH4) > P(CD4) but the curves cross below the melting point and the vapor pressure IE for the liquids is inverse (Pd > Ph). For water and methane Tc > Tc, but for water Pc > Pc and for methane Pc < Pc- As always, the primes designate the lighter isotopomer. At LV coexistence pliq(D20) < Pliq(H20) at all temperatures (remember the p s are molar, not mass, densities). For methane pliq(CD4) < pLiq(CH4) only at high temperature. At lower temperatures Pliq(CH4) < pliq(CD4). The critical density of H20 is greater than D20, but for methane pc(CH4) < pc(CD4). Isotope effects are large in the hydrogen and helium systems and pLIQ/ < pLiQ and P > P across the liquid range. Pc < Pc and pc < pc for both pairs. Vapor pressure and molar volume IE s are discussed in the context of the statistical theory of isotope effects in condensed phases in Chapters 5 and 12, respectively. The CS treatment in this chapter offers an alternative description.

Figure 13.3. A P- V-T surface for a one-component system in which the substance contracts on freezing, such as water. Here Tj represents an isotherm below the triple-point temperature, 72 represents an isotherm between the triple-point temperature and the critical temperature, is the critical temperature, and represents an isotherm above the triple-point temperature. Points g, h, and i represent the molar volumes of sohd, hquid, and vapor, respectively, in equilibrium at the triple-point temperature. Points e and d represent the molar volumes of solid and liquid, respectively, in equihbrium at temperature T2 and the corresponding equilibrium pressure. Points c and b represent the molar volumes of hquid and vapor, respectively, in equilibrium at temperature and the corresponding equihbrium pressure. From F. W. Sears and G. L. Sahnger, Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory, and Statistical Thermodynamics. 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975, p. 31.

The above procedure is now applied to two ethanol-water (8, 9) and five 1-propanol-water systems (9) which have been saturated with an inorganic salt and which show partial miscibility. The vapor pressures and molar volumes (10), and second virial coefficients of water (11), ethanol (12), and 1-propanol (IS) were obtained by interpolation of literature data. The vapor pressures of water saturated with salts over a temperature range are available for all salts (14) except lead nitrate. Such data are unavailable for both alcohols saturated with salt. Hence a correction to the saturation vapor pressure is made by multiplying by the ratio of the vapor pressure of alcohol saturated with salts to the vapor pressure... 

Since the value of AHu remains constant over a large range of pressures, the maximum in T is determined by the point at which the molar volume change is zero. The volume comparison must be made between the pure liquid hydrocarbon, liquid water, and hydrate, since the hydrocarbon must exist as liquid at pressures between the vapor pressure and the critical pressure. Maxima in hydrate formation temperatures above Q2 have been calculated, but they have yet to be measured. 

Air-water partition coefficients and Flenry s law constants are strongly temperature dependent because of the temperature dependencies of vapor pressure and of solubility. FI is also slightly dependent on the temperature dependence of water density and, hence, molar volume. The constants may be concentration dependent because of variations in yw, although the effect is believed to be negligible at low concentrations of non-associating solutes. Noted that these simple relationships break down at high concentrations, i.e., at mole fractions in excess of approximately 0.01. For most environmental situations, the concentrations are (fortunately) usually much lower. For thermodynamic purposes, H is usually preferred, whereas for environmental purposes, H is more convenient. 

When Eq. (4.11) is applied to the vaporization of a pure liquid, dPM/ dT is the slope of the vapor pressure-vs.-temperature curve at the temperature of interest, AV is the diffeVence between molar volumes of saturated vapor and saturated liquid, and AH is the latent heat of vaporization. Thus values of AH may be calculated from vapor-pressure and volumetric data. 

Hydrogen bonds were first detected through solubility studies (1497), and were quickly found by the many other classical methods available in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Vapor pressure and vapor density, molecular weight, dielectric constant, partition or distribution, molar volume, parachor, refractive index, electrical and thermal conductivity, and acoustic behavior are a few of the physical properties that reflect the presence of the H bond. 

For each complete adsorption isotherm obtained, we applied the BJH method [ 10] to obtain an isotheim-based pore size distribution. The supplemental data (reference isotherm, surface tension, vapor pressure, and molar volume) were obtained for the same model fluid in separate... 

For biomaterials that are thermally unstable and decompose before reaching the critical temperature, several estimation techniques are available. We have used the Lydersen group contributions method ( ). Other techniques available for predicting critical properties have been reviewed and evaluated by Spencer and Daubert ( ) and Brunner and Hederer Qfi). It is also possible to determine the EOS parameters from readily measurable data such as vapor pressure, and liquid molar volume instead of critical properties (11). We used the Lydersen method to get pure component parameters because the vapor compositions we obtained were in closer agreement with experiment than those we got from pure component parameters derived by Brunner s method. The critical properties we used for the systems we studied are summarized in Table II. 

In Equation 2, Vi and v2 are the probe molar volume and polymer specific volume, respectively M2 is the polymer molecular weight and R is the gas constant. Pi is the probe vapor pressure and Bn is its second virial coefficient in the gas phase. For work with high polymers, the third term of Equation 2 becomes negligible and may be omitted. 

---