Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Modified pressure

If time permits and a more accurate estimate is desired, particularly if the compressor is intercooled or has sidestreams, the velocity head losses through the nozzles can be estimated using the values from Table 2-2. This is possible where the nozzle sizes are available or can readily be estimated. When coolers are involved, the drop through the cooler should be included. Subtract the pressure drop from the inlet pressure (of the stage following the element) and recalculate a modified pressure ratio for the section. The cooler pressure drop can be approximated by using 2 - i... [Pg.164]

SFC-NMR is available from 200 to 800 MHz, and is suitable for all common NMR-detected nuclei. SFC/SFE-NMR requires dedicated probe-heads for high pressure (up to 350 bar) and elevated temperature (up to 100 °C). SFC-NMR is carried out with conventional packed columns, using modifier, pressure and temperature gradients. The resolution of 1H NMR spectra obtained in SFE-NMR and SFC-NMR coupling under continuous-flow conditions approaches that of conventionally recorded NMR spectra. However, due to the supercritical measuring conditions, the 111 spin-lattice relaxation times 7) are doubled. [Pg.486]

The source terms on the right-hand sides of Eqs. (25)-(29) are defined as follows. In the momentum balance, g represents gravity and p is the modified pressure. The latter is found by forcing the mean velocity field to be solenoidal (V (U) = 0). In the turbulent-kinetic-energy equation (Eq. 26), Pk is the source term due to mean shear and the final term is dissipation. In the dissipation equation (Eq. 27), the source terms are closures developed on the basis of the form of the turbulent energy spectrum (Pope, 2000). Finally, the source terms... [Pg.247]

Since the pressure field depends only on the magnitude of the velocity (see Eq. (1-22)) and since the flow field has fore-and-aft symmetry, the modified pressure field forward from the equator of the sphere is the mirror image of that to the rear. This leads to d Alembert s paradox that the net force acting on the sphere is predicted to be zero. This paradox can only be resolved, and nonzero drag obtained, by accounting for the viscosity of the fluid. For in viscid flow, the surface velocity and pressure follow as... [Pg.8]

The solution given by Eqs. (3-7) and (3-8) is derived using only the first four boundary conditions (L3) i.e. without considering the normal stress condition, Eq. (3-6). The modified pressures can be obtained from Eq. (1-33) and are given by... [Pg.31]

Fig. 5.4 Dimensionless excess modified pressure at surface of sphere. Numerical results of Woo (W9). (Note different scale for Re = 1.0 curve.)... Fig. 5.4 Dimensionless excess modified pressure at surface of sphere. Numerical results of Woo (W9). (Note different scale for Re = 1.0 curve.)...
Fig. 5.28 Distribution of dimensionless modified pressure at surface of spheres at Re = 100, compared with potential flow distribution. (A) Potential flow (p, — Px)/ipU = 1 — 2.25sin fl (B) Rigid sphere (L5) (C) Water drop in air k = 55, y = 790 (L9) (D) Gas bubble k — y 0 (H6). Fig. 5.28 Distribution of dimensionless modified pressure at surface of spheres at Re = 100, compared with potential flow distribution. (A) Potential flow (p, — Px)/ipU = 1 — 2.25sin fl (B) Rigid sphere (L5) (C) Water drop in air k = 55, y = 790 (L9) (D) Gas bubble k — y 0 (H6).
Fig. 8.3 Surface modified pressure distribution for spherical-caps at high Re, derived using the method of McDonald (M2). Experimental profiles obtained from photographs of bubbles in water. Fig. 8.3 Surface modified pressure distribution for spherical-caps at high Re, derived using the method of McDonald (M2). Experimental profiles obtained from photographs of bubbles in water.
The method developed by McDonald (M2) to calculate surface dynamic pressure distributions for falling drops (see Chapter 7) may also be applied to large fluid particles. Equation (7-19) may therefore be applied. For a perfect spherical-cap whose terminal velocity Uj is given by Eq. (8-5), the modified pressure over the leading surface is given by... [Pg.207]

Supercritical fluid extraction conditions were investigated in terms of mobile phase modifier, pressure, temperature and flow rate to improve extraction efficiency (104). High extraction efficiencies, up to 100%, in short times were reported. Relationships between extraction efficiency in supercritical fluid extraction and chromatographic retention in SFC were proposed. The effects of pressure and temperature as well as the advantages of static versus dynamic extraction were explored for PCB extraction in environmental analysis (105). High resolution GC was coupled with SFE in these experiments. [Pg.16]

We have proved in Section 2.1.2. feat fugacity, as a sort of modified pressure, plays a valuable role in dealing with non-ideal, real gases. We extend fee concept of fugacity to... [Pg.67]

To improve the convergation ratio of the calculations a modified pressure correction algorithm and changed calculation of velocities on the boundaries were implemented. [Pg.561]

Integrating the component of o- arising from the modified pressure, p, gives a force, additional to skin friction, arising from the fluid motion. The component of this force parallel to u is called the form drag. [Pg.121]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), usually with carbon dioxide and, often, with a modifier, has become of increasing interest in the last few years because of its selectivity, preconcentration effect, efficiency, simplicity, rapidity, cleanness, and safety, mainly concerning the extraction of organic compounds prior to separation and detection by chromatographic techniques. It has several advantages over classical solvent extractions, in comparison with recent extraction techniques. Approaches to obtain quantitative extractions, including fluid choice, extraction flow rate, modifiers, pressure, and temperature, are presented, as well as the potential for SFE to extract polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soils, sediments, and biota. Improvements and new environmental applications are also reported. [Pg.1239]

A modified pressure test has been proposed by Nesbitt and Bell in which the specimens are heated to 1,350 0. and immediately subjected to pressure transmitted through a 2-in. steel ball. The depth to which theballhas been pressed into the specimen is considered to be the criterion of the load resistance of the material. [Pg.487]

All of the sanples were treated by one of three different standard procedures for vacuum/pressure inpregnation Full Cell Method, Enpty Cell Method (Lowry) or modified Full Cell Method (15). The treatments were applied in a modified pressurized paint tank set up to simulate the procedures used commercially in typical pressure treating cylinders. It was connected to a letboratory vacuum pump in order to pull a vacuum of up to 29 in. Hg (98 kPa), and a conpressed air cylinder in order to provide up to 120 psi (827 kPa) air pressure. After treatment, the surface of specimens was wiped free of excess solutions, the sanples were air dried overnight, then placed in the circulating air oven and dried to constant weight to remove solvent and moisture before calculating retentions. [Pg.28]

Figure 2. The pressure evolution of the glass temperature and the melting temperature in selenium. Solid curves show parameterizations via the modified, pressure invariant Simon Glatzel type... Figure 2. The pressure evolution of the glass temperature and the melting temperature in selenium. Solid curves show parameterizations via the modified, pressure invariant Simon Glatzel type...
Based on the polarity difference between CO2 and the interior of the micelles, w/c microemulsions have found many applications as extraction media. Furthermore, by modifying pressure and temperature, solvent quality may be changed and it becomes, therefore, possible to exert a real control over the extraction process uptake of solutes inside micelles may be varied. This may be of use for separations/extractions involving bio-chemicals and proteins. In conventional solvents their separation from the reaction medium can be quite complicated, involving tedious processes such as fluid-fluid extraction, decantation, chromatography column, filtration, precipitation. Use of supercritical fluid technology with extraction in reverse micelles seems advantageous for proteins (e.g. 19, 76). This process was also used for the extraction of metals (77-79) and more recently of copper from a filter paper surface (1). [Pg.291]

Modified Pressure Filtration Procedure. A modified procedure to determine cyclohexane solubility of reaction slurries having high to moderate solids content required the use of some THF. A 5-7 g reaction slurry sample was diluted with approximately 25 mL of THF the mixture was stirred and transferred to the filtration holder containing 30 mL of THF, and the normal filtration procedure was carried out. The residue was removed, dried, and weighed. [Pg.230]

The THF filtrate, which also contains cyclohexane soluble vehicle, was concentrated by roto-evaporation to remove the THF, 5 mL of THF was added back to the slurry, and this THF slurry was dripped into 150 mL of stirred cyclohexane. The flask that contained the concentrated THF solution was sonicated with 10-30 mL of cyclohexane in order to clean it thoroughly. Since the filter/holder has a capacity of 100 mL, only two-thirds of the 150-mL cyclohexane suspension was added. Approximately half of the cyclohexane suspension in the filter/holder was pressure-filtered to allow addition of the remaining suspension. Five hundred mL of cyclohexane was then added to reservoir R, and the sample was pressure-filtered. The residue was then removed, vacuum-dried, and weighed. Since the THF-insoluble material was also cyclohexane-insoluble, combining the weight of the THF-insoluble residue and the insoluble residue obtained from the cyclohexane filtration allows the calculation of a cyclohexane solubility value. The results from the modified procedure on one sample will thus give both THF and cyclohexane solubility values. The modified pressure-filtration procedure takes 2 to 2 1/2 hours. [Pg.230]

When internals or packings are present in a pipeline, the pressure drop can be estimated vith a modified pressure-drop equation (Equation 2.4-21) ... [Pg.178]

Polydipentene Sucrose acetate isobutyrate coatings modifier, pressure-sensitive Hydrogenated rosin coatings, /polymeric food-contact Aluminum stearates coatings, ablative Phenolic resin... [Pg.4971]


See other pages where Modified pressure is mentioned: [Pg.282]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.879]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.5615]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.205]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.9 , Pg.31 , Pg.42 , Pg.102 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info