Modified lateral forces

Mate [6] first obtained the friction force signal as well as the normal load signal by modifying an AFM in 1987. The modified AFM was called FFM or LFM (lateral force microscopy). The friction force signal was obtained by detecting the tor-... 

First we analyzed the states of a tip scanning along an ascent and descent surface on nanometer scale, and then we calibrated the lateral force obtained by the FFM we modified. It may be helpful to understand how to measure the true lateral force by an FFM. 

For example, chemical contrast images were obtained by lateral force microscopy (LFM) from a topologically flat surface of a self assembled monolayer consisting of chemically different domains. In order to make the chemical adhesion the dominant contribution to the friction signal, the tip was modified by a monolayer with appropriate terminal groups [149-155]. However, since LFM operates in contact mode, the surface deformation is inevitable. 

After these initial and promising lateral-force results, the friction force microscopy (FFM) was introduced. The FFM is a modified SFM with a four-quadrant photodiode, based on the laser beam deflection technique (Meyer Amer 1988) (Fig. 2.17). The beam is emitted by a low-voltage laser diode and reflected from the rear side of the cantilever to the four-quadrant photodiode. With this detection scheme, normal and torsional forces can be measured simultaneously. The torsional forces correspond to the lateral forces measured with the instrument of Mate et al. (1987). In 1993, Ovemey introduced the threefold measurement of topography, friction and elasticity on a polymer sample using an ITM. With this latest achievement, a wide spectram of tribological information was opened up, limited only by the lattice parameters of the sample. 

Later, Tomiyama [156, 154] observed a defect in the original model by Antal et al, namely, that a bubble located far from the wall is attracted to the wall. Based on a best fit of model simulations to experimental data from a square duct with wall-distance H, a modified wall force was given as ... 

Lateral force AFM is a powerful tool that is utilized to investigate the frictional properties of monolayers formed by different double-chain quaternary ammonium surfactants self-assembled onto mica. A relationship between frictional properties at the nano and microscale is possible by comparison between lateral force measurements using a standard AFM tip and measurements modified by replacing the tip with a sphere. 

Scanning Force Microscopy / Lateral Force Microscopy. The SFM experiments were performed on a NanoScope III (Digital Instruments, (DI) Santa Barbara, CA) using triangular shaped cantilevers (Dl) with a nominal spring constant of 0.12 N/m and 0.38 N/m, respectively. The torsional spring constant was calibrated as described in reference 20). In addition to unmodified tips, chemically modified tips were also used. The procedure for self-assembled monolayer deposition for the chemical modification of the tips is described in reference 20). 

The SFA, originally developed by Tabor and Winterton [56], and later modified by Israelachvili and coworkers [57,58], is ideally suited for measuring molecular level adhesion and deformations. The SFA, shown schematically in Fig. 8i,ii, has been used extensively to measure forces between a variety of surfaces. The SFA combines a Hookian mechanism for measuring force with an interferometer to measure the distance between surfaces. The experimental surfaces are in the form of thin transparent films, and are mounted on cylindrical glass lenses in the SFA using an appropriate adhesive. SFA has been traditionally employed to measure forces between modified mica surfaces. (For a summary of these measurements, see refs. [59,60].) In recent years, several researchers have developed techniques to measure forces between glassy and semicrystalline polymer films, [61-63] silica [64], and silver surfaees [65,66]. The details on the SFA experimental procedure, and the summary of the SFA measurements may be obtained elsewhere (see refs. [57,58], for example.). 

SFA has been traditionally used to measure the forces between modified mica surfaces. Before the JKR theory was developed, Israelachvili and Tabor [57] measured the force versus distance (F vs. d) profile and pull-off force (Pf) between steric acid monolayers assembled on mica surfaces. The authors calculated the surface energy of these monolayers from the Hamaker constant determined from the F versus d data. In a later paper on the measurement of forces between surfaces immersed in a variety of electrolytic solutions, Israelachvili [93] reported that the interfacial energies in aqueous electrolytes varies over a wide range (0.01-10 mJ/m-). In this work Israelachvili found that the adhesion energies depended on pH, type of cation, and the crystallographic orientation of mica. 

A frame is a structure with at least one member that supports more than two forces. Members of a frame may support lateral as well as axial forces. Connections in frame need not be located at the ends of the members. Frames, like trusses, are designed to support loads, and are usually motionless. A machine also has multiforce members. It is designed to modify and transmit forces and, though it may sometimes be stationary, it always includes parts that move during some phase of operation. 

It is necessary to be able to calculate the energy and momentum of a fluid at various positions in a flow system. It will be seen that energy occurs in a number of forms and that some of these are influenced by the motion of the fluid. In the first part of this chapter the thermodynamic properties of fluids will be discussed. It will then be seen how the thermodynamic relations are modified if the fluid is in motion. In later chapters, the effects of frictional forces will be considered, and the principal methods of measuring flow will be described. 

The analysis was later modified to include some of the factors neglected by Nusselt1213. One of these is the effect of buoyancy forces acting on the liquid film. This results in the pl term in Equation 15.80 being replaced by Pl(pl — Pv ) Such buoyancy forces are usually only important close to the critical point. In most cases, the two most important factors that cause a significant deviation from Equation 15.80 are the presence of vapor shear forces and noncondensable gases in the vapor. Vapor shear forces act to increase the heat transfer coefficient, whereas noncondensable gases act to decrease it. 

Parameters for bond angles were derived in a similar manner, first by considering the methylamines only, and later by modifying the resulting parameters to reproduce the observed structures of the bulkier amines, diisopropylamine and di-t-butylamine. The N—C—C angle was chosen to fit ethylamine. However, since in its current form the force field cannot reproduce the experimentally observed dependence of this angle on the... 

---